Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


nuclearshark last won the day on June 26 2018

nuclearshark had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

51 Excellent

About nuclearshark

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Had the following email from FlixBus. Who now have offered to up the compensation to £900 I suspect they plan to file an appeal for relief from sanctions? Should I let them try it?
  2. Another update. This was the order from the Court during the hearing on 20th September is as follows: Then received a phone call today from FlixBus informing me they'd settle out of Court for around 750.00 Needless to say I asked them if they'd received the latest documents from the Court. No was the answer. So I read out the order and politely declined the offer as the Court had already decided the case. The Representative requested a copy of the Order which I sent to them while I was on the phone. They advised me they'd get back to me on what
  3. Just a very brief but positive update on this one. The Police took no further action as the driver recalled the incident, accepted that he could've handled things differently but denied any wrongdoing. The Police also advised me that no CCTV footage could be retrieved as they DO NOT have CCTV onboard the bus. Whilst they had a manifest they choose not to contact any passengers or advertise for witnesses to come forward and the matter was disposed of with No Further Action. I also have a partial identity of the driver as the Police Officer when discussing what the driver responded i
  4. Just wanted to leave this local news story here. Again Smart Parking in the same town, but the car park just a little further up the road from where your PCN was issued... https://www.wiltshiretimes.co.uk/news/15710685.driver-hit-by-4000-in-fines/ Shows you how incompetent SP are...!
  5. No they don't have a UK Office unfortunately. However I believe I have found why my Affidavit was defective. It seems the legislation.gov.uk website referenced Article 26 of the Lugano Convention when it should actually say Article 28. So I think I now have a suitable Affidavit to request Judgment outside of Jurisdiction. It probably needs some tweaking. But considering how little information exists on constructing the Affidavit I'm reasonably happy to reattempt a submission.
  6. Ok so some updates on this. I started the process of a Claim a while ago and served the papers on the company by registered courier. They did not file a Defence or Acknowledgement of Service so I requested judgment by way of N244, N225, N215 and Affidavit. Unfortunately the Judge rejected my Affidavit as it was not CPR PD 12.4.3 Compliant and has offered me 28 days to correct the mistake. However I am unsure how I need to amend my Affidavit to begin with, very little is covered on this online. What wording do I need for my Affidavit to make
  7. After the company received the Judgment they contacted me for Bank Details and made a prompt payment. So the matter is resolved and the case is WON!! I also discovered the Judgment is listed over on the Trust Online website. I think that's slightly better than if I simply discontinued as it may help others facing any future similar issues with such booking websites they can refer to my case. Thanks again all for your help!
  8. Wow... made a complete hash of trying to reformat this after accidentally hitting post before I'd finished. Post above can be deleted if needed. Then things started to become difficult Obviously I'm not going to withdraw until I receive payment, so I completed N205A requesting Judgment on Admission and including their admission forms they sent to me. I was also mailed a copy of the companies accounts. I'm happy to upload these but I believe they are what is freely available over at Companies House. Sent off the doc
  9. So an update on this, seems the CCMCC did issue the claim form but didn't serve it because the address was missing on the form. After reviewing my N1 I didn't understand and it seems that the copy / paste from Companies House made the address a c/o address and CCMCC don't like serving to those. So I wrote an email to them which stated the following: This was presented to a Judge who granted the request and the forms were served. I then had correspondence from Loco2 Ltd I did not initially respond to this as I was away with my partner at the time and as
  10. No not too tough at all, I think I just used a bad way of writing this out. Indeed I'm well versed in CRA 2015 and thought my post would allude to that. But maybe I didn't write it very clearly so my apologies for that there. This was more a documentary style posting than a request for help so I'm sorry for any confusion on that point. I was also more documenting this issue mainly for my own recollection at a later point but also for those who may be told the same in another Three store. I'm sorry if I didn't make any of this clear. The store is Hutchinson 3G Limited or Three as th
  11. I recently upgraded my 3 Contract to a new phone which developed a problem. I contacted 3 and was initially told to speak to the manufacturer. They advised that as I was in the 30 day period of Consumer Rights Act 2015 to request a replacement that I go to the store to arrange this as it would offer a faster resolution. I agreed with this course of action and went to the store on day 29. Leaving it late admittedly due to health issues. When I arrived at the store the Assistant Manager then gave just about every excuse under the sun about being able
  12. Hi all, Having a bit of a headache with TV Licensing which I've been trying to sort out for my friend. My friend suffers from various mental health issues, is in receipt of benefits and has trouble managing their finances. They recently had a letter from TV Licensing with a payment plan over 4 months for £35 per month. This is completely unsustainable for them, instead they wrote a letter requesting a payment plan over 9 months but still within the same year. They'd pay around £8.00 per fortnight this way on the day they receive their benefits
  13. Loco2 was who I attempted to book the ticket with for travel on . They were also who I booked my actual ticket with for travel on the following day. Their terms and conditions say this - https://loco2.com/en/booking-terms-and-conditions#contract : So I'm inclined to reject that response as they should have sorted themselves out as you rightly say.
  14. Had this response just now: So time to file the claim form? Or should I approach Deutsche Bahn?
  15. Ok sent the LBC. It seems I'm the proverbial guinea pig on this one in this case. Fortunately I am entitled to HWF so my expended costs on this are nil minus time (which I probably have too much of right now) and any potential counter claim. I'll take that chance too. It also saves them being exposed to the same fees I guess too. The bit that annoys me most on this one, is the price for the same train went UP after it was reported. So it seems to me there was a factor here that allowed it to continue. From the other thread, we also know it happened more than once so it plausible i
  • Create New...