Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MCE Portfolio Fabricating Documents - Help Needed***Claim withdrawn by Consent***


kenzo5
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4022 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Looking for advice.

 

Brief history:

 

1. 6/2003 Took out Marbles credit card from HFC

 

2. 9/2012 Received Claim for £6700 and Statuary Interest (SI) £3450 from Mortimer Clarke Sols acting for MCE Portfolio Ltd

 

3. 10/2012 Combined CPR31 asking for agreement plus T&C, deed of assignment, default notice

 

4. 10/2012 Filed statute barred and embarassed defence due to lack of detail.in POC

 

5. 11/2012 Claimant sends

a. reconstituted statements 6/2005 - 8/2007

b. application form with separate T&Cs

c. Deed and Notice of Assignment

d. Default Notice

 

6. 11/2012 Case stayed as claimant didn't reply within time period to defence

 

7. 3/2013 Application to lift stay granted

 

8. 3/2013 Allocation Questionnaire returned

 

9. 4/2013 Stayed until 21 May 2013, by 7 May must file a completed directions questionnaire

 

10. Claimant sends letter asking for complete income expenditure and request for payment proposals and indication of defense.

 

 

From the statements received it appears I made reduced payments until May 2007 so the debt is not statute barred. I plan to defend claim on unenforceable agreement and also dispute the amounts claimed if that fails. To enable to finalise my postion I would

appreciate help on the following:

 

 

 

Total amount of claim is over £10k so not eligible for small claims track. However the balance claimed contains charges and SI appears too high. If these figures can be recalculated to below £10k is there any way I can get this allocated to SCT.I assume they want Fast Track so they can pile on the legal expenses if they win, therefore, if I win can I claim my research expenses for which time reading through the forum is racking up. Are there any other advantages/disadvantages between the tracks.

 

 

The balance claimed contains contain late payment review charges can you please point me to the relevant legislation I can research. Do I dispute amounts claimed or counter sue for the charges and compound interest on them?

 

 

They're asking for over £3000 for 8% statuary interest(SI). On their claimed outstanding balance this is over 6yrs of interest. SI can be claimed from cause of action, for credit card debt is cause of action date the date of first missed payment? Because I made last reduced payment 3 May 2007

the claim is not statute barred as the is the cause of action date is reset. Now is the cause of action date for SI different if so how can this be? If not they have over charged SI. Further they have claimed SI for over 6 years yet they didn't take over the debt until 2012 so how are they entitled to interest previous to then?

 

 

The main thrust of my defence is unenforceable agreement. In response to CPR31 they have provided a copy of my applcation form from 2003 with a stapled separate T&Cs. Now the T&Cs contain as far I can tell all the prescribed terms I can make out the headings but the actual text is too small to read.

However I am certain that these are not the original T&Cs. Also they have also forwarded reconstituted statements and a perfectly formed default notice. However these are word processed files not on headed paper so can have been created at anytime, there is nothing to indicate these were actually sent to me.

In fact the statements refer to $ amounts and the DN is dated 25th Oct 2007 but states remedy by 12th Nov 2008 (not my date typo). From a copy of my credit file the actual DN was in 2006. Also the deed of assignment and notice of assignment are for Pheonix Recoveries to MCE Portfolio how do I know the debt was assigned from HFC to Phoenix. Any suggestions to best proceed in proving that these are made up documents with the prime reason to unlawfully obtain money. Anyone else any experience of this? Also is reporting MCE portfolio to FSA/OFT appropriate at this time if I had my way I would report to police for falsifying documents to extort money, a substantial amount as well.

 

 

In response to the stay the claimant has requested I complete an income & expenditure form, give proposals for payment and details of my defence. Does completion of said form and reply constitute as admitting the debt in writing to the creditor so starting the 6 years

statute of limitations once again? I am wary as the six years from my last payment ends in a couple of weeks and I have already had default on credit record for over 7 years and don't want to add a further 6 years. Further to this the claim is stayed so we can mediate to try to achieve

settlement so if I write alleged and without prejudice does this mean I accept the debt? As I am on benefits and have no savings I do not believe they will accept any offer I can afford so likely to end up in court anyway.

 

 

I know I have asked a lot of questions but I believe that they know I cannot afford to pay and want a charging order, therefore, I intend to fight to the best of my ability and any advice gratefully received.

 

 

 

-K

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ken and welcome to CAG legal forum.

 

Just one point you state that the total claimed includes Sec 69 Interest ? The claim should have it in the particulars but not included in the total claimed ...its at the discretion of the Court to allow the interest.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

Thanks for the welcome. POC

 

The Claimant therefore claims 1. 6732.65 2. Interest pursuant to section 69 of the CCA 1984, namely 3444.05 & continuing until Judgement or sooner payment at the rate of 1.48

 

Amount Claimed 10176.70

Court fee 190

Solicitor's costs 100

Total amount 10466.70

 

so have they added it to Amount claimed to push over £10k

 

regards

 

-K

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Ganymede

 

Thanks for the information. I am concerned that if for whatever reason the current case was withdrawn I don't want to inadvertently do something stupid to restart the clock for another 6 years. However in the spirit of mediation I assume putting forward an outline of my defence, namely, disputing charges under S??? and S69 interest amount and for pre 2007 agreement I will require true and signed copies of the relevant documents not obvious fakes. I also let them know after the court hearing I will be reporting them to the relevant bodies (that OFT/FSA?) as they are not fit and proper to conduct their business. I assume that I am not the only person they have used faked documents to obtain money they are not entitled to, so would it be appropriate to refer this version of the 'Nigerian' [problem] to the police or I am completely wide of the mark here?

 

further advice gratefully received

 

 

-K

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

Thanks for the welcome. POC

 

The Claimant therefore claims 1. 6732.65 2. Interest pursuant to section 69 of the CCA 1984, namely 3444.05 & continuing until Judgement or sooner payment at the rate of 1.48

 

Amount Claimed 10176.70

Court fee 190

Solicitor's costs 100

Total amount 10466.70

 

so have they added it to Amount claimed to push over £10k

 

regards

 

-K

 

Not sure from your post ken you need to type out the PoC verbatim less any identifiable data...is the debt stated as £6732.65?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi Andy

 

yes, debt is stated as £6732.65 and S69 Interest claimed £3444.05 giving Amount claimed £10176.70. Verbatim as follows:

 

By an agreement in writing between HFC Bank PLC ("HFC") & the Defendant dated 03/06/2003("the Agreement") HFC agreed to issue Defendant with credit card upon terms & conditions set out therein. In breach of the Agreement the Defendant failed to make payments of not less than the minimum payment shown on the monthly statement. HFC served a Default Notice on the Defendant stating the amount due & requiring the Defendant to pay same. The Defendant failed to pay & the Agreement was terminated. The Agreement was assigned to the Claimant on 12/04/2011. The Complainant has complied with Sections III and IV of Practice Direction - Pre-Action Conduct.

THE CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS.

1. 6732.65

2. interest pursuant to section 69 of the CCA 1984, namely 3444.05 & continuing until Judgement or sooner payment at the rate of 1.48

 

Then in the box bottom right of N1

Amount Claimed 10176.70

Court fee 190

Solicitor's costs 100

Total amount 10466.70

 

 

Hope this is of assistance

 

-K

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Been reading a few threads and it seems that 'falsifying' of documents is standard practice by some claimants and I should accept that's how things are.

 

As the claim has been stayed for mediation I need to contact the Claimant with my proposals. I believe that the claim is for an unenforceable agreement, furthermore I am on benefits and can't pay nor do I have any savings, advice appreciated on what I propose.

 

- K

Link to post
Share on other sites

8. 3/2013 allocation questionnaire returned

 

9. 4/2013 Stayed until 21 May 2013, by 7 May must file a completed directions questionnaire

 

10. Claimant sends letter asking for complete income expenditure and request for payment proposals and indication of defence.

 

You have already submitted your defence...so its now time to see if they wish to submit a further DQ and proceed...then you will be able to attack them on the inclusion of the sec69 interest.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

This whole experience is like Alice in Wonderland. Can I just clarify

 

1. Standard Order for stay for settlement with consent of all the parties. On or before 7 May 2013 one of the following steps must be taken:

 

either the claimant must notify the court that the whole of the claim has been settled

 

or claimant or defendant must write to the court requesting an extension of the stay period......................................

 

or all parties must file a completed directions questionnaire at court.........................

 

So I also have to file DQ? Would this be the placed to attack re S69 interest? What would I be attempting to achieve? Would a strike out of claim due to inclusion of SI incorrectly putting claim in fast track so putting me in a financial perilous position re legal expenses be a realistic outcome?

 

In the meantime it's Ok to negotiate? and since my original statute barred and embarrassed defense I have had no further opportunity to refine my defense when does that take place?

 

Sorry for all the questions but this process is utter bewilding and there doesn't seem to be an easy handbook to follow.

 

regards

 

-K

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes both parties must file a further DQ in the event that directions 1 & 2 do not apply.In your opening post you state that the claim is not SB are you 100% sure of this? Judging from the title of your thread its not uncommon for phatom payments to appear when SB is approaching the debt.

 

When you filled your last DQ did you propose any Directions? Did the Claimant?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

Thanks for your reply. Made reduced payments, last payment was 3rd May 2007 not phantoms, was getting over illness and pressurised into agreeing to make said payments then savings ran out. I'd forgot I'd made them hence SB defence but the amounts on supplied statements verified against current account. So SB 3rd of next month - is that correct? Before that date is it true that I cannot even negotiate or send income expenditure form as this will start clock running again. I know that this claim stops clock but if for whatever reason they don't proceed at DQ then sell debt I don't want to mistakenly incur another 6 years.

 

I didn't propose any Directions, only just found out what they are CPR28 correct? I have never had a copy of Claimants AQ should I have?

 

-K

Link to post
Share on other sites

So SB 3rd of next month - is that correct?

 

Only if the claim is struck out or discontinued...litigation halts the clock.Of course you can negotiate... don't disclose your I&E...its not necessary.If they fail to submit their DQ the claim will be stayed until either party make application to proceed.

 

You need to submit Directions with your next DQ to request disclosure of the documents they will be relying on.You can make reference to the included sec69 within the DQ. Request a copy of their previous and current DQ once submitted.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say from your file that the DN was originally issued in 2006 and did not allow sufficient time for the remedy. However, you are also saying that you made reduced payments to the account until 2007 - in which case they will be allowed to issue another DN. If they had terminated the account in between the first DN and the 2nd, that might have been a different ball game. I am sure others will point out anything wrong in my thoughts above.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy

 

I will only be financially able to offer a nominal F&F settlement figure so I was going to send IE just to indicate this was a realistic offer and I am not taking the mickey. Sorry to repeat myself but this negotiation wills not count as acknowledgement of debt for SB purposes?

 

regards

 

-K

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi CitizernB

 

DN was issued 2006 per credit file but AFAIK I never received it, therefore, I cannot ascertain that it complied with the prescribed format. The 2007 DN was also never sent but MCE's reconstruction obviously has all the terms but this is a clear word processed fake as the default date and remedy date are dated for different years.

 

regards

 

-K

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi CitizernB

 

DN was issued 2006 per credit file but AFAIK I never received it, therefore, I cannot ascertain that it complied with the prescribed format. The 2007 DN was also never sent but MCE's reconstruction obviously has all the terms but this is a clear word processed fake as the default date and remedy date are dated for different years.

 

regards

 

-K

 

I would think this could be useful if they haven't even bothered to reconstruct correctly - it could throw doubt on other paperwork they are producing. However, andy would need to comment on that.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

 

Brief Update. We have entered period of negotiation which goes as follows:

 

1. Claimant ("C") writes you owe us £11k whqat are your proposals

2. Write back with no savings and on benefits and so offer nominal amount F&F

3. Unsurprisingly F&F refused and they will kindly accept a voluntary charge

4. I decline CO, tell them that F&F was all I can afford and was a nuisance payment. Told them I was making a Part 20 counterclaim for unfair charges, compound interest thereon and SI. Also requested under CPUTR 2008 whether they the solicitors and/or C currently hold or have ever held a properly executed Consumer Credit Agreement in your/their possession pertaining to myself and if not, to kindly confirm so in writing.

5 C will reduce charges from £25 each to £13 no mention of interest. Also they will accept the claim amount less the SI included within total amount. In response to CPUTR request instead of a simple yes/no answer sent another barely readable copy of application form which they state together with illegible T&Cs already sent constitutes the agreement

6 Me yet to counter

 

 

Fed up with reconstituted illegible agreement if I make a CPR31.15 request do I have to travel to their premises to view?

 

Also want to DSAR the original lender but the notice of assignment states the C is data controller. However all relevant details are prior to alleged purchase date and I wouldn't trust what they sent anyway so am I OK to DSAR original lender?

 

thanks

 

K

Link to post
Share on other sites

" Fed up with reconstituted illegible agreement if I make a CPR31.15 request do I have to travel to their premises to view? Yes

 

Also want to DSAR the original lender but the notice of assignment states the C is data controller. However all relevant details are prior to alleged purchase date and I wouldn't trust what they sent anyway so am I OK to DSAR original lender?" Yes you can

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

Consent order received

 

1 The Claimant's claim against the Defendant to be withdrawn

2 There be no order as to costs

 

 

On reading other threads I should add

 

3. The claimant will not litigate further regarding this account

4. The claimant will not at any time assign this account to a third party

 

but as alleged debt now statute barred since 3rd May I will sign the above unless

anyone sees a problem.

 

Although I think I have a good defence as documents supplied are forgeries (for

everbody else other than DCAs who call them reconstituted) the risk of a few

hundred pounds costs against a claim plus costs of £20k plus time and stress

makes signing a no brainer for me.

 

 

Thanks to Andy and all others for their advice and taking the time to help.

 

regards

 

K

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kenzo

 

Excellent result I will amend your thread title to reflect the result.

 

I would add that it is pointless adding 3/4 above...that would be unacceptable by the claimant which could jeopardise the consent.

With regards to the debt being SB ..the clock stopped when the claim was issued.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent news - I am pleased to hear this is now approaching a conclusion for you.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

Final question :) (at least on this thread) - re SB the clocked stopped on issue of claim but if the claim is now discontinued if there is a new claim in future SB date will run from last payment made not issue of last claim?

 

regards

K

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...