Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I posted a couple of years ago about our debt situation and have been trying to pay off our debt as best we can. It is a possibility I maybe made redundant in a few months time, so I am trying to find out everything I can about what happens in today’s world when you can’t pay. I keep finding conflicting advice on various sites so I wanted to post this quote to get thoughts. It claims basically that the dca will likely get enforceable documents these days and therefore it’s likely you will have to pay dca at some point during the 6 year process.    on here I read a lot of comments assuming the exact opposite of this. A lot of the threads on here state the beginning of the process but I never see conclusive stuff about what happened from start to finish to get insight into whether debts post 2015 have been enforced etc. I hear a lot here not to pay dca companies but most my debts are post 2015 debts I am all up to date on our debts but if I lose my job it is likely I’ll end up where I tried to avoid in the first place. Which is destroying our files and dealing with DCA. I’ll post it below so you can see what I mean.   It is likely that any debts incurred after 2007 will end up with all the documentation being provided and being enforceable. Therefore you should use the time while awaiting responses going through your Income & Expenditure and considering any possiblity of making a full and final settlement. It can take a number of months to reach the stage of a hearing date and exchange of witness statements and normally you would be able to settle or come to an arrangement to pay before the court hearing, once documents have been provided, although this isn’t guaranteed.
    • depends who said sols state their client is. IDRWW vis~IDR(worldWide) are a debt collector regulated & registered in the UK & USA    they are not solicitors. they use various 'for hire' - here use our letterhead paper tiger solicitors. its just a case of who's stupid enough to join their folly. IDR law used to be their fav but they lost do much money, they broke ties after almost being struck off and now do Will/Probate disputes only. IDR Legal are their sols wing. moriarty law Judge and priestly Taheel - a foreign DCA that use absolutely any trick in the book to extort money even pretending to be any of the above inc being the bank themselves in phone calls.           
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DLC/Aplins court paperwork orange mobile debt


pike
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4045 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had a orange phone last year they cut me off as was late paying the bill and customer service was not contactable on the 150 as calls were barred.they cut me off so thought nothing more of it

 

DLC wrote to me asking for payment contacted orange as was going to pay them not DLC but they refused to accept payment and i refused to deal with the debt collector.

 

I have now received a claim form from Northampton bulk center

 

The claim is double to what shows on my credit file!

 

Particulars of claim

 

The claim is for call and service charges due and unpaid as at todays date under a network services contract made between the claimant and the defendant .

 

 

How is the best way forwards on this i have acknowledged the claim just need a deference if there is one?

 

Orange were the one that barred my phone at the time for around a £50 bill surely they broke the contract and now trying to charge for something they not providing

 

Thanks for your time

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think it was a 24 month contract if you can call it one as i doubt there is any paperwork to back them

 

they have broken the contract by barring phone wile charging for something they not providing

 

firstly orange would not accept payment as have to pay the debt collector but i refused that as ant contract is with orange

 

now they claim more money or get a ccj blackmail in a way ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you have a bill of £300 to the end of the contract, plus VAT. The remaining £200 must be charges

 

the problem is that you signed a commercial contract with orange for 24 months. You are obligated to the terms of that contract to pay £50 a month

 

you broke that agreement by not making a contractual monthly payment

 

i would be sending the claimant a request under CPR 31.14 for a copy of the airtime service agreement with terms and conditions, a fully particularized schedule of costs as to how the £500 quid has been incurred

 

i take it it was DLC who issued the claim and not orange

 

did you receive any letter before action or any notice of assignment

Link to post
Share on other sites

i got the normal we may might and if letters

the court paperwork has the claimant as Orange personal communications

Debt recovery team

 

Address for documents and payments is Aplins

 

looks like i will have to pay in this case if there is no deference

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you type up the particulars of claim or post a scanned copy (with personal data removed)? Need to know more detail about these "service charges".

 

A nice first step would be a CPR 31.14 request to get a copy of the network contract if you don't have it already.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks how do you go about a CPR13.14 request please

 

Got the letter saying they may do the CCJ and i it is awarded and costs

 

Particulars of claim

 

The claim is for call and service charges due

and unpaid as at today s date under a networ

k services contract made between the claimant

and the defendant .

 

That is exactly how it is written on the paperwork

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a sticky with an example CPR 31.14 request here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?159445-Getting-Them-To-Reveal-Their-Vitals.-Using-CPR-31.14-to-Your-Advantage. I think you need to ask for a copy of the contract, notice of assignment to DLC and a breakdown of the unpaid calls and service charges.

 

Watch the deadlines. Sounds like you have filed an acknowledgement, so 28 days from service of the claim form to serve your defence. If they don't reply to your CPR request in time you will need to file a Defence based on the information you have and explaining that their POC is inadequate.

 

That Particulars of Claim are incredibly short. Their letter says they want costs, but if it is not in the POC they won't get it (indeed there are usually no costs in the small claims track for claims below 10k).

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Having sent off the CPR 31.14 request to Aplins have got a letter from DLC

 

We are still awaiting a copy of the network services contract from the original lender and will forward it to you in due course.

We confirm your account will remain on hold until we have done so.

..............................

............................

Should you require an extention of time to file your defense pursuant to part 15 of the

practice directions we will consent to a extension of 28 days

 

Will see if they come back with anything or drop it with some luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though they say the account is hold, do keep an eye on those deadlines - best to respond saying you accept their offer for an extension of 28 days and file a defence within that deadline whether or not the documents have been provided.

 

If the 28 days expire you either need to file your defence or ask for the proceedings to be formally stayed. The maximum extension the parties can agree between themselves is 28 days anything more than that needs court permission, and if you have not filed a defence in time there is a risk they will try to get default judgment.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...