Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
    • Frankly I think you should go to a hearing unless you feel especially nervous . If you have any worries then you should follow our link to find out about a county court familiarisation visit     You shouldn't forget that county Court judgements are very helpful but they are not binding. They are only persuasive.  It is difficult to see you losing but it might be better to be there in order to counter any arguments from the other side
    • OK - I have rejected mediation and said I wish to proceed to a court hearing. I said 'Yes' to : Do you consider that this claim is suitable for determination without a hearing, i.e. by a judge reading and considering the case papers, witness statements and other documents filed by the parties, making a decision, and giving a note of reasons for that decision? since they appear to be relying solely on my failure to purchase their additional 'parcel protection coverage/insurance' which my submission of the PENCHEV and SMIRNOVS transcripts should kick firmly into touch.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Labour's workfare shame


osdset
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4081 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Story here http://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/author/johnnyvoid/ this is not just about people mandated on to the WP, this legislation has implications for all of us. If the government can break the law then retrospectively change the law what stops them applying this to anything else?

 

There is no point now taking the government to court over anything, they could simply reverse court judgments by 'going back in time' and changing the rules, we are heading for a dictatorship, and there is no party with the guts to do anything about it.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Yes, grim reading indeed , we are not in a dictatorship or anywhere near it. If we were this site and a great many more would not exist.

We can start or join a pressure groups, write or lobby our MP's or start/sign any (e)petition, join a political party and a great deal more and as a last resort, we can take direct action. We are not toothless. What this government rely on is apathy and resignation on behalf of the majority of us.

If you feel what is happening is bad, use the means at your disposal. If you can login to cag then you can start/sign a e-petition, email your MP etc.

I'm deeply unhappy with this government and I'll do all I can to express my dismay to all sundry. I hope you will join me.

pitcher

Awop-Bop-A-Loo-Mop-Alop-Bam-Boom. ~ Little Richard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do and will continue to email my MP, sign e-petitions as most in place are what I would be saying anyway, as for joining a political party, I am not seeing any worth it which is worrying apart from very sad. I actually wrote that we are ON A PATH to dictatorship, and I think that the Tory Govt, pigheadedly and seemingly freely, will steer us down that path, I don't have to bang on about benefits and the such, we all know whats happening, I see the rich barely, or not at all affected, and the poor getting poorer, downtrodden, and left to rot. Yes they do rely on people doing nothing, but they also rely on the fact that all we can do is speak out, they don't have to listen or act on it, they snake their way through backtracking slightly when they realise they've made a **** up, that cant be swept over. They are pigheaded and defiant and its going to take more than some e-petitions to shake this lot up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ruby,

WOW! I read and feel your anger on this matter.

I agree with what you say about the rich get richer and the poor getting it in the a...

The use of retrospective legislation is very scary and immoral but I do not think it's puts us on a path to dictatorship, maybe a very short step but no more. If I'm wrong and the worst comes to be, you will see me on the barricades, I'm the one in the wheelchair.

As for joining a party, yes it is both worrying and sad that the issues we seem to have in common are not foremost in the minds of any creditable party.

Yes the condems are pigheaded and defiant, It will take more than the odd e-petition to make a change but on this day over a quarter of a million people went on strike to show exactly what they think of this government. There are more targeted strikes to follow.

You state in your post, “I don't have to bang on about benefits and the such...” I'm more than happy for any one to “bang on about benefits”, this government, with the help of a right-wing press has demonised the sick and disabled etc. It shows just how low they are.

Please keep you MP on his/her toes and sign those e-petitons, I think it can make a difference.

My best,

pitcher

Awop-Bop-A-Loo-Mop-Alop-Bam-Boom. ~ Little Richard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't say what I want to on here, as I don't want the site getting closed down, but lets just say, due to the actions of this and the previous government I now do all I am able to disrupt the corruption they are trying to force on us, I lawfully rebel every single day and I actively demonstrate at local and national marches, I firmly believe that the revolution has started.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bazooka,

I think you can say what you want, the site won't close. Your posts may be edited by the site team!

When it came to the poll tax I protested both legally and illegally, it is a personal matter of how far anyone is prepared to go. I's great to hear you're fighting, more power to you!

Sorry to disagree with you on the matter of revolution. I've seen high times in the past that came to nothing and I see nothing new. Revolution, regardless of which way it goes hurts those less able to deal with change and now I don't want to see anyone hurt. Apart from the rich, greedy F*****S.

Regards,

pitcher

PS

Signed WOW, every little hurts!

Edited by pitcher

Awop-Bop-A-Loo-Mop-Alop-Bam-Boom. ~ Little Richard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW I signed first time I saw it. Yes I am fuming at this Govt and the lies that spill from their mouths. They don't help anyone into work, more jobs are lost than created, and their idea of making it pay to be in work is to punish those that aren't in work, the reason makes no difference. I am all for looking after the elderly, they deserve it, but so do the sick and disabled, the council tax benefit reduction is a total disgrace, the elderly are exempt and that's good and fair but the sick and disabled who cannot work should not be penalised. As for penalising all working age claimants, well its a shame they cant just get their rear ends in gear and provide jobs instead of taking them away.

 

Sorry am ranting...my blood pressure is way up tonight, yes am angry....am fuming.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they both chasing the same middle class and pensioner votes.

 

I think labour when in power are more mellow ie. they not so pushy on tax cuts for the rich and welfare cuts, but they certianly not the same as the old labour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What did you expect from the Liebor party? They are the ones who reintroduced workfare.

Yes you are 100% right on that one. maybe liebor are just letting the condems do their dirty work for them. I have lost any faith in any of the main parties but I had little trust in any of them to start with.

pitcher

Awop-Bop-A-Loo-Mop-Alop-Bam-Boom. ~ Little Richard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your right there worried33......think I remember, not sure if this is right...monster raving loony party?....they would do LOL not a clue what the spiel was. Too funny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW I signed first time I saw it. Yes I am fuming at this Govt and the lies that spill from their mouths. They don't help anyone into work, more jobs are lost than created, and their idea of making it pay to be in work is to punish those that aren't in work, the reason makes no difference. I am all for looking after the elderly, they deserve it, but so do the sick and disabled, the council tax benefit reduction is a total disgrace, the elderly are exempt and that's good and fair but the sick and disabled who cannot work should not be penalised. As for penalising all working age claimants, well its a shame they cant just get their rear ends in gear and provide jobs instead of taking them away.

 

Hi Ruby,

I don't think you're ranting at all. Sorry about your blood pressure! You're angry? Join the club. I agree with most of your post but you differentiate between pensioners and the sick/disabled etc. It’s been said by others on this site, divide and rule is how the condems try to fool us. IMHO this is the problem we all have to deal with. The condems state they are for the strivers I.E. those in work, while at the same time, through their cuts, over three hundred thousand public sector workers have lost their jobs. The condems, through the right-wing press encourage the low paid workers to think that the dole/ESA etc. is a life of luxury and therefore sets the working class against the unemployed/sick and disabled working class. Sorry If I've gone on a rant! I think I need a blood pressure tablet. I'm fuming.

 

pitcher

Edited by antone
Fixed quote tags - content not changed

Awop-Bop-A-Loo-Mop-Alop-Bam-Boom. ~ Little Richard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have emailed my mp Stephen Crabb weekly and everytime he only answers with government rehtoric. He is flipping useless.

So in my case emailing my mp does nothing :-C

 

I didnt cause the global finiancial problems so why do I feel that we are paying a higher price?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I didnt cause the global finiancial problems so why do I feel that we are paying a higher price?

 

The answer is in your question. Those who cause the financial crisis have made a double bet. If they had won, they would have demanded the price, as it's fair in a capitalist society. But because they've lost, they have changed the law so it's up to the poor to bail them out. Remember what happened in France in 1789?

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

The answer is in your question. Those who cause the financial crisis have made a double bet. If they had won, they would have demanded the price, as it's fair in a capitalist society. But because they've lost, they have changed the law so it's up to the poor to bail them out. Remember what happened in France in 1789?

 

capitalism for the profits, but not for the losses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

emailing my mp about the shambles that is atos, and recording assessments etc etc, mp acknowledged email, and stating they were writing to the appropriate minister and would get back to me...that was 31st jan .....still waiting......I emailed again last week ..reply...they are still waiting......******** is MHO on that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...