Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4047 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

To cut a long story short my car was clamped for being untaxed last september. I paid the release fee and then retaxed, and had to go to my local dvla office in Shrewsbury to show the new tax disc which would enable them to release the £100 surety fee paid upon release of the clamp.

However i recently recieved another letter stating that my car was seen in shrewsbury at 11.31 on 16/09/09 and i should pay another £78.

 

Now i think they are being crafty knowing that i was in shrewsbury on this date to sort things out at there offices. I have wrote to them today to ask for evidence to show me it definately was. A couple of things, firstly i cannot remember exactly what date it was but if i was there i would have had the new tax disc as that was the point in going. 2nd, on their letter the road i am supposed to have been seen on was tudor rise, on searching online i can only find a tudor road two different roads altogether so does this make it void ? Any advice appreciated. :-)

 

 

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

HelloI recently had a car which was untaxed and not sorn towed away by the dvla. i signed the letter saying i didnt want it back and absolve myself of anything further to do with it and any monies raised from scrappage etc would be used to cover their costs. Anyway i have had a letter since chasing me for £170 in unpaid tax. I only bought the vehicle recently and the dvla should be able to see from the date of ownership change that i'm not responsible for any tax prior to this date. I have to either attend court or pay the fine but i would like to dispute it. any advice ?

 

 

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reply to it and state what you said above.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Recieved a final demand today, not heard off them since August, and as i said originally as far as i'm concerned i don't owe them a penny due to them taking the vehicle. Why are they still harrassing me!? The demand is for £545 off central finance & enforcement unit. How to proceed ?

 

 

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are two different matters, the charges etc. for the removal of the vehicle, and the outstanding duty for the period the vehicle was unlicensed.

You may have settled the removal charges, but DVLA are claiming the missing duty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That maybe but it never amounted to £545! I will write to them to clarify

 

 

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok will do, have spoken to them and my appeal was dismissed but i never recieved any correspondence saying so until now. Checking on the vehicle status it is still showing as unlicensed even though it was impounded in april. I dont want any further fines so how can i go about stopping them? why havent they scrapped it? Maybe i should send them a letter advising they have a vehicle which doesnt have a valid tax disc and is not currently sorn??!!

 

 

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is the court you need to contact - they are claiming the £545, not the DVLA.

 

As far as the DVLA are concerned, you have been found guilty at court and the case is closed.

Edited by Raykay
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the vehicle is still showing unlicensed and i am still the registered keeper then surely further enforcement action could be taken? I get your point about the court but dont want any more fines. So how do i stop them trying to get further cash from me? They impounded the vehicle and i have no control on that but it is still in my name as they havent scrapped it or if they have they havent updated the records cause as of the 9th oct 2012 which is the date thats shown when i look at the current licence status as last updated on it shows unlicenced.

 

 

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

At this stage it is the court you need to deal with, according to their letter in post 4, you only have a few days left to appeal (in writing) before they consider further steps.

Edited by Raykay
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes indeed, have replied today so should just make it in time. In the mean time i am going to send off form V888 to the dvla to get all data from them which should include the letter i returned to them with the box ticked absolving me of any dealings with this vehicle as proof should any further charges land on my doorstep. Thanks.

 

 

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hello

My magistrates court fine has been passed to collectica who phone me sevral times a day and leave robotic voicemails,

they have already added £200 for a visit which i dont know ever took place a

s the debt is under my parents address and they were out at the time.

 

I got a letter which looked like the address was hand written.

 

I have phoned them and offered to pay £10 a week but they are saying £47.50 minimum per week is what they will accept.

 

Secondly the fine was for keeping a vehicle without a tax disc and the vehicle was towed away.

 

I signed a letter from the dvla stating they can scrap/sell the car and all proceeds go towards my fine but this hasnt happened.

So can i get the car back or insist they do this and forward proceeds to collectica ?

 

Who else has had dealings with these?

 

 

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you attend the court hearing?

Was a payment plan put in place?

 

Im sort of guessing you didnt.

If you cannot afford to make the payments due under a fine and you are not receiving benefits, you must contact the Magistrates Court immediately and the court will require that you attend a very simple hearing where you will have to complete a list of your Income & Expenditure. It would be for the Magistrate to consider your circumstances and set a payment arrangement that is affordable. For a hearing such as this, there is no fee to pay, and normally you will simply be able to turn up at the Magistrates Court without an appointment.

 

Following the hearing, the court will advise the fines office of the arrangement that has been agreed and this should ensure that bailiff action will cease…..you must keep to the payment arrangements.

 

With thanks to tomtubby for the above information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no i didnt attend as i was disputing it as the dvla had taken my car and i'd agreed they could keep it and the proceeds raided from it could be used against any fines/costs imposed. no payment plan was agreed. i f i remember correctly i just had a letter from the court asking for full payment which i ignored and shortly after i started recieving letters/calls from collectica.

 

 

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would try and get to the court and see if you can have this dealt with. It is the only way that the bailiff can be called off. The longer you leave this the more you will have to pay.

 

Im not sure about the predicament with regards to your car being towed, however eventually it will be squashed as they will only hold on to a car for a certain amount of time depending on the circumstances.

 

Do you know where your car is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the car is in telford at one of their pounds, it was towed off last may and is still showing as unlicensed if i do a search on it so presumably not yet crushed. So can i go back to the court that issued the fine and ask them for a repayment option ?

 

 

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you have a number for them or do i contact the original court that dealt with it ?

 

 

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a shame that you have provided such a short reply. You say that the court has agreed to add this fine to 2 others. Has the court agreed to take the case back from Collectica? If so, this is very unusual.

 

What has happended to the fees charged by Collectica?

 

This court appears to have been most helpful. Have they given you a reason why they have taken it back?

 

Also, is this a London court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a shame that you have provided such a short reply. You say that the court has agreed to add this fine to 2 others. Has the court agreed to take the case back from Collectica? If so, this is very unusual.

 

What has happended to the fees charged by Collectica?

 

This court appears to have been most helpful. Have they given you a reason why they have taken it back?

 

Also, is this a London court?

 

Think you may need to look at this one

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?384377-Urgent-help-needed-collectica-bailiffs**Update-account-returned-from-bailiffs**

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a shame that you have provided such a short reply. You say that the court has agreed to add this fine to 2 others. Has the court agreed to take the case back from Collectica? If so, this is very unusual.

 

What has happended to the fees charged by Collectica?

 

This court appears to have been most helpful. Have they given you a reason why they have taken it back?

 

Also, is this a London court?

 

Hi Tomtubby

 

I apologise for my short reply.

 

A short while ago I received a a letter from the HMCTS Collection & Enforcement Centre (Leeds) with a notice of arrest. Is was an unpaid TV license fine. I called the Enforcement Officer and she arranged for me to go back to the Magistrates Court to discuss reasons why I hadn't paid my fine and also to set up a payment. She advised me that I had a further 2 fines (another TV license & a DVLA fine for not transferring ownership) which would also be dealt with. I went to court and sat in front of a judge and he reduced my 2 license fines and set a payment. The 3rd fine was not dealt with - the magistrate just said "I note you have a third fine which is currently with the bailiffs".

 

When I got out of court i telephoned the enforcement officer to inquire about the third fine and she said "I don't know why it has been sent to the bailiffs because normally they are all dealt with together" I asked her what I need to do and was told basically to ride it out with the bailiffs for 6 months (fob them off) as it would then be passed back to her to deal with.

 

So yesterday a bailiff appeared at my door from Collectica. He wasn't taking no for an answer and was explaining just what rights he had due to this being a Magistrates fine. He parked outside my house for 45 mins and said he was calling the police & a locksmith.

 

I desperately tried to get hold of the enforcement officer but she was unavailable. I called Stepchange for advice and was told "pay the debt" (I kid you not). I then spoke to someone at the HMCTS Collection & Enforcement Office and she explained that the enforcement officer was aware of my call but was on a police operation and would call me back.

 

I then received a call from the office who advised me that they had spoken to Collectica and cancelled the distress warrant. She then said that she had taken of their fees and added my fine to the back of the fine I am currently paying. She did say that Collectica *may* pursue me for their charges but she added that they would do that as normal bailiffs (not with special powers).

 

Hope this explanation helps x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...