Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the side street solely for access to your garages? who owns the land and thus the road? dx  
    • A local business has been parking on an off-street parking space in front of my garages (in a side street).  I wasn't using them for a while so didnt bother to do anything.  But now a second local business is also using the osp - taking it in turns with the 1st biz.  This has started to nark me.    The employees choose to drive to work.  There is no private parking in their business's street.  But there are some underground secure garages in their street - which cost apx £2.4k/y to rent - which works out apx £6.60/d. (I believe one of the biz owners already rent one for storage purposes).  If the employee had to park on a meter it would cost them £6.60/h - £66 for 10h and have to move every 4h.  They just don't want to pay for parking. I haven't confronted either of them.  Instead I just put 2 clear "no parking" signs in front of the garages. And a note on one of the cars specifically saying that as they don't live or rent in the street and it's private land could they stop parking.   They ignored that.  And just put notes on their dash with a # to call if one needs the car moved.  There is a sign and they've been told in writing to stop parking. And they are just ignoring it.    I don't what a confrontation.    I don't want to go to the expense of bollards (other than maybe traffic plastic ones - but they'll probs just move them).  Council won't do zilch cos it's private land. And police won't get involved - unless I clamp/ tow the cars and then they'd be after me, not the drivers!    What's the best thing to do?
    • yes might be the best idea. you'd only at best get 8% flat interest and that unusual on a GOGW if this was what it was. simply contact the FOS and let them know its resolved. dx  
    • If you’ve ever wondered how you might fare in armed combat, the first 20 minutes of Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan is likely to make you thank your lucky stars you were born too late to storm the Normandy beaches on June 6 1944. I suspect many of us might be driven to identify with those men who were absolutely turned to stone by fear. And yet these young men, mainly conscripts, screwed their courage to the sticking point and did the job the fate had chosen for them, heroes all.   .. UK PM Sunak perhaps thinks he understands mind numbing fear better than many as he dishonorably fled the beachhead to do nothing more than double down on dishonest spin and lies from the safety of a UK studio .. The Normandy heroes who not only held their positions, but advanced through hell to a victory that changed the entire course of history .. undoubtedly hold a different perspective.     from a perspective in TheConversation     .. 'That was the slot that sunaks team offered for the interview
    • Yes, send a message to the purchaser but keep it very friendly and simply that you noticed that the package has now been delivered.  I suggest that you ask them if they want to keep the package still or if they would rather return it and that if they want to keep it then please will they return your payment to you to your PayPal address. Keep it as polite and friendly as possible and then we will decide what to do if he doesn't reply or refuses.  Meanwhile I will have a look at Google earth and see if you are able to spot the gas meter outside the house to get an idea if the delivery is real. Get a screenshot
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claim Issued by 1st Stop Financial PDL Company***Resolved/Settled by Mediation***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3958 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Morning aronik. I believe it's 33 days in total regardless of when you submit your acknowledgement of service within the fourteen days I.e if you submit it on the first day of receipt or the 14th day it's still the 33 days 14 + 14 + 5 (correct me if I'm wrong andyorch :-)

 

Wht date is your defence due?

 

Did you manage to get your defence sorted aronik?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

She informed me that they don't send anything by post and everything is done via email - and that they couldn't resend that information as I should have "already received it".

 

I've been looking through my emails and the first email I received as soon as I hit submit on the site was the TOCs. Funnily enough this is what's stated:

 

9.2 Any notice or demand we give will be assumed to have been properly given if served on you personally, or left or sent by prepaid envelope addressed to you at your current address or last known business or private address. If sent by first class post it will be assumed to have been received by you 48 hours after posting.

 

Really? Wow... and I thought they done everything by email including default notices!

 

Lancer :-o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets reserve that for further response Lancer...may be useful.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lancer

 

I assume its the N149 that you have received given that this will be SCT.Take time and don't rush it look around the forum for others examples...they should serve a copy of theirs on you..if you can wait before your time limit is up this will give you an heads up on their intentions.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lancer

 

 

 

I assume its the N149 that you have received given that this will be SCT.Take time and don't rush it look around the forum for others examples...they should serve a copy of theirs on you..if you can wait before your time limit is up this will give you an heads up on their intentions.

 

 

 

Regards

 

 

 

Andy

 

 

 

 

Andy,

 

It's an N152 notice of defence.

 

Cheers

 

Lancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then its not an AQ then N152 is a Notice a defence/counter claim has been filed.Conformation you have submitted your defence.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It still has a questionnaire I need to fill out and return by the 8th April. Is this normal? Questions basically ask if I want mediation, I am happy with the SC track and do I have a preference as to which court it is held at.

 

Cheers

 

Lancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right so it is a N149 Small Claims Track

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Andy, there's two sheets. The defence confirmation is a N152 and there is a N149 questionnaire attached.

 

How long should I be waiting for them to serve their form? Do they send it directly to me?

 

Thanks again. Much appreciated

 

Lancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

They may not serve a copy on you (they should but not mandatory) If you have not received theirs by say - 4 days to submission of yours then you will have to complete it without sight....and dont serve a copy of yours on them just file yours with the court.

 

What date must it be submitted by?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really....... try not to use the AQ as a further defence its purely for allocation purposes only.Two things to watch I advise you always select settlement..this is encouraged by the Court and in G you can state anything additional that may assist in the allocation.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really....... try not to use the AQ as a further defence its purely for allocation purposes only.Two things to watch I advise you always select settlement..this is encouraged by the Court and in G you can state anything additional that may assist in the allocation.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Morning Andy! Thanks. Which section of the form relates to a settlement? I was thinking of making them an offer at this point via a letter. Is this something that can be done.

 

Do I need to request any documents via the aq in relation to my specific case?

 

Cheers

Lancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning Andy! Thanks. Which section of the form relates to a settlement? The very first Question (A) I was thinking of making them an offer at this point via a letter. Is this something that can be done.Not with the AQ you simply tick A and the court will stay the matter for mediation....then you can then discuss offers

 

Do I need to request any documents via the aq in relation to my specific case? Did you not complete a CPR 31.14 as advised early in your thread?

Cheers

Lancer

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy.

 

I have not requested any documents via CPR 31.14 as there was nothing specific mentioned in the POC as per your advice

 

]2) Should I have issued a CPR request for any information (non were mentioned in the POC)? Then there is nothing to request vis a CPR 31.14

 

Regards

 

Lancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

A yes quite right ok in G write something similar to this :- Edit to suit

 

'The Particulars of Claim provided by the Claimant are inadequate in order to fully appreciate the case I have to meet, in particular the agreement relied upon, the date on which it was made, the terms thereof and whether regulated and if so by what statutory provision, the means by which it was terminated, the manner by which the claim is calculated, and the Claimant's entitlement to interest.

 

1.Unless the Claimant file and served upon the Defendant fully particularised Particulars of Claim comprising but not limited to particulars of the agreement relied upon, the date on which it was made, the terms thereof and whether regulated and if so by what statutory provision, the means by which it was terminated, the manner by which the claim is calculated,and the Claimant's entitlement to interest, the claim shall stand struck out.

 

2 In the event of compliance with paragraph 1 of this order this case shall be allocated to the small claims track and there shall be a stay of proceedings until for 1 month to enable the parties to settle using the small claims mediation service.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a bit of time this evening and ill have along around the forums and do some further research to customise the above for section G.

 

Would be great if you could take a look when I post,and advise please Andy. Much appreciated.

 

Cheers

 

Lancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Andy,

 

Hope you are well. Just working on my section G for my AQ as we speak. I have a couple of questions which I hope you don't mind answering.

 

1) I know there is no mention to any documents in the POC, and as such no CPR request was issued. Should I be requesting documents using a Draft Order for Directions, or does the section G you wrote above cover this? Will they have to provide me copies of the documents that they will be relying on before taking this to mediation?

 

2) Should I make any reference to changing my defence if they provide a a revised POC, and will I have a chance to change this before the hearing if they decide against mediation?

 

Thanks

 

Lancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Morning Lancer

 

OK the N149 does not facilitate the option of draft directions...this being small claims track..so you can only suggest withing G that the disclosure of documents would assist the process of claim and hope the DJ agrees and issues said direction.

 

You can raise the matter of disclosue within mediation but they are not compelled to respond.

 

If they wish to amend their particulars they would require court permission and yours so if that happened you would be allowed to submit a particularsed defence...but by reply because of their action so no you dont need to refer to this as this time.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info Andy. I've now submitted by N149 and sent a copy to the Claimant.

 

Received nothing from them though :x No surprise there...

 

I want to try and bring this to an end sooner, rather than later. I am looking at making them an offer before mediation to see if they will accept. Should I use the standard template letter for a F&F within the CAG Library? I have been reading around this a bit, but the only thing I can seem to find is in relation to part 36. Is this the way to go, or can I use a standard letter template?

 

Thanks

 

Lancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info Andy. I've now submitted by N149 and sent a copy to the Claimant.

 

Received nothing from them though :x No surprise there...

 

I want to try and bring this to an end sooner, rather than later. I am looking at making them an offer before mediation to see if they will accept. Should I use the standard template letter for a F&F within the CAG Library? I have been reading around this a bit, but the only thing I can seem to find is in relation to part 36. Is this the way to go, or can I use a standard letter template?

 

Thanks

 

Lancer

 

Any advice on the above please, Andy?

 

Thanks

 

Lancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Part 36 is not really applicable to small claims and irrelevant to your current position.Any offer can be made verbally or in writing without prejudice...I personally would not advocate making a F&FS at this stage.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...