Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Heres a point, while we wait for @theoldrouge to condemn rather than promote and support right wing bigots spouting genuine and clear monstrous antisemitic rhetoric ... Isn't it actually specifically unlawful to promote violence against politicians on top of laws to criminalise such things? ... As is reported happening in these closed facebook groups run by Tory staff and where a Tory police minister and the Tory London mayor candidate are members and post?   .. or do the Tories (seemingly like tor) only promote laws for protecting the hate spouting hard right ?   "“Some of these (Tory facebook groups) posts constitute the most appalling racism and I would urge the Conservative Party to swiftly distance itself from these hate-filled groups and urgently investigate what role any Conservative politicians and officials have played within them. “Susan Hall and the Tory MPs who have belonged to these groups need to come out and explain why – and to denounce the content they have tacitly endorsed by their membership.” "Reporters found widespread racism and Islamophobia as well as conspiracy theories and celebrations of criminal damage on the pages, including sharing the white supremacist slogan and antisemitic videos. " "Unearthed found that 46 out of the 82 admins have clear links to the Tory Party, including a recent digital campaign manager for the party and a conservative activist. Conservative councillor for Haywards Heath, Rachel Cromie, is an admin on all the groups. "     Also interesting that Facebook groups opposing 20mph speed limit in Wales are being run by English Tories   Conservative-run anti-Ulez Facebook groups hosted racist and Islamophobic posts - Unearthed UNEARTHED.GREENPEACE.ORG Tory staff running Facebook groups described as 'cesspits of vile racism' WWW.THENATIONAL.SCOT TORY staff and activists are running Facebook pages which are riddled with white supremacist slogans and Islamophobic attacks... Conservative-run anti-ULEZ Facebook groups are rife with racist and violent posts   Conservative-run anti-ULEZ Facebook groups are rife with racist and violent posts - London Post LONDON-POST.CO.UK A coordinated network of 36 Facebook groups opposing London’s ultra-low emission zone (ULEZ), run by Conservative councillors and...  
    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unenforceable CCA agreement.


howardb
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4075 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys, I've done a CRA on MBNA for a £3500 debt that's been outstanding for a couple of years now, that they have kept a default on my CRA but are being very coy about actually chasing.

 

I suspect the CCA (If you can call it that, it looks like an application form to me) is not correctly formed, and thus unenforceable. Could someone validate that for me? (CCA Attached).

 

Also, assuming it's unenforceable, how do I force MBNA to take it off credit reference agencies (CRA's)?

 

thx in advance

Edited by howardb
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jpg is to small to read if it contains all the prescribed terms it would probably be accepted by a court as an agreement.

 

At this time MBNA can mark the CRA files as a default as this reflects the account at this time, the account would be removed when default is 6 years old or account statute barred.

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah the attachment upload system on CAG seems to convert it from hi definintion to tiny blurred jpg. Anyway, I can tell you for a fact that interest rate and credit limit is not on the signed portion of page (ie front page), so thats at least two prescribed terms missing, although there is an alleged back page aswell from what I read that doesnt count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scan the cca as a pdf.

 

Also when was the loan taken out. when was the last time you made payment. When was the last time you acknowledged it in writing (cca request doesnt count).

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok will do, the 'Application' was signed late 1996, last payment was about 2010 (I stopped paying when they lowered my limit and doubled my initerest rate without telling me!). Although they tried to get me to admit the debt on the phone I did not, I SAR'd them in 2010 and also raised a complaint with the financial Ombudsman when they failed to produce CCA initially. They eventually provided full SAR late 2010 and have been VERY quiet since. I would let sleeping dogs lie, but the default on my CRA just cost me a new contract/job with a bank (For which I had been accepted), so is getting VERY costly.

Edited by howardb
Attachment added
Link to post
Share on other sites

The cca must comply with specific requirements. Mainly they need a copy of the original plus terms t&cs of it at inception and now.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys, I've done a CRA on MBNA for a £3500 debt that's been outstanding for a couple of years now, that they have kept a default on my CRA but are being very coy about actually chasing.

 

I suspect the CCA (If you can call it that, it looks like an application form to me) is not correctly formed, and thus unenforceable. Could someone validate that for me? (CCA Attached).

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also, assuming it's unenforceable, how do I force MBNA to take it off credit reference agencies (CRA's)?

 

thx in advance

 

 

Hi, just taken a look through your thread, the ''form'' is one og MBNAs dual purpose app/agreement forms the often used on things like postal promotions, and I can see that there is a stamp an annotaions on the form so it would seem to me that it is more than likely compliant with section 77/78 CCA '74., but I would like to see all of the form.

 

As to removing the default entry from CRA files, the creditor is still entitled to report the account on a regular basis, as unenforceable means only that the agreement cannot be enforced in court, the debt still exisits and can be pursude by all normal collection processes short of court action.

 

The account is pre April 2007 so a compliant copy of the original would be needed in court.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no need to state the credit limit but there must be something about how it is decided. Is that all they sent you,what about T&Cs and a signed statement of account.

 

From what i can see it is UE but don't take my word for it.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brigadier, thx attached is the 'reverse' photo copy I was provided with in the SAR though I have no proof it really was the reverse of the front page I signed. It seems as a 'general' form, there should have been plenty of other CAG'ers that have encountered it's enforcability or not.

 

I also read somewhere that the ICO had issued guidelines stating that debts should not be reported to CRA's under cerain circumstances, one of which was where the debtor has disputed the debt and the creditor has been unwilling to enforce it in court (ie because they know it's unenforcable.), thats where i'm trying to get to, make it an ICO issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brigadier, thx attached is the 'reverse' photo copy I was provided with in the SAR though I have no proof it really was the reverse of the front page I signed. It seems as a 'general' form, there should have been plenty of other CAG'ers that have encountered it's enforcability or not.

 

I also read somewhere that the ICO had issued guidelines stating that debts should not be reported to CRA's under cerain circumstances, one of which was where the debtor has disputed the debt and the creditor has been unwilling to enforce it in court (ie because they know it's unenforcable.), thats where i'm trying to get to, make it an ICO issue.

 

Hi Howard,

 

That's defo a dual purpose form, I have one here from a case similar to yours, I would be hard pushed to state categorically that is or is not unen, bit if a creditor supplies evidence of useage and payments to the account then it would be up to a judge to decide.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fletch that link doesnt take me to anything related?

 

Brigadier (Are you really an ex Brigadie btw? )ok, well given their reticence to take ANY action on it, i'm going to work on assumption they know it's unenforcable, and use that as starting point to withdraw their right to process my information. I might just be poking a hornets nest, but I don't want to wait another three years for this to drop off my CRA reports.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah ok, based on the issued guidlines I think they will fall foul of section 44 "If the dispute has not been before a court, is the lender prepared to test their claim by seeking a CCJ or decree against the customer? If not, why not?"

Link to post
Share on other sites

My memory sucks, just being going through the old correspondence on this, IGNORE EVERYTHING ABOVE, I just remembered they failed the timescale requirement on a section 78 request I did, so the debt is automatically unenforcable. So now it's direct route to ICO pressure to remove default. This is the letter I sent back in 2009:

 

Head of Customer Assistance

MBNA Europe Bank Limited

Stansfield House

Chester Business Park

Chester

CH4 9QQ

 

25th September 2009

 

Dear Sir/Madam

DEFAULT NOTICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974 78 (6)

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxxxxx

I do not acknowledge ANY debt to your company. You have now failed to supply me with a copy of the signed executed agreement for the alleged “debt” you are trying to enforce. This request was sent on 9th September 2009 by recorded delivery. The Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for this request to be carried out before your company enters into a default situation. The time limits expired on 25th September 2009.

 

For your information the relevant section of the Consumer Credit Act states the following:

61 Signing of agreement

(1) A regulated agreement is not properly executed unless—

 

(a) a document in the prescribed form itself containing all the prescribed

terms and conforming to regulations under section 60(1) is signed in the

prescribed manner both by the debtor or hirer and by or on behalf of the

creditor or owner, and

 

(b) the document embodies all the terms of the agreement, other than

implied term.

Additionally:

78 Duty to give information to debtor under running-account credit agreement

(1) The creditor under a regulated agreement for running-account credit, within the prescribed period after receiving a request in writing to that effect from the debtor and payment of a fee of £1, shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it, together with a statement signed by or on behalf of the creditor showing, according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer,—

(a) the state of the account, and

(b) the amount, if any, currently payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor, and

© the amounts and due dates of any payments which, if the debtor does not draw further on the account, will later become payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor.

 

(2) If the creditor possesses insufficient information to enable him to ascertain the amounts and dates mentioned in subsection (1)©, he shall be taken to comply with that paragraph if his statement under subsection (1) gives the basis on which, under the regulated agreement, they would fall to be ascertained.

 

(3) Subsection (1) does not apply to—

(a) an agreement under which no sum is, or will or may become, payable by the debtor, or

(b) a request made less than one month after a previous request under that subsection relating to the same agreement was complied with.

 

(4) Where running-account credit is provided under a regulated agreement, the creditor shall give the debtor statements in the prescribed form, and with the prescribed contents—

(a) showing according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer, the state of the account at regular intervals of not more than twelve months, and

(b) where the agreement provides, in relation to specified periods, for the making of payments by the debtor, or the charging against him of interest or any other sum, showing according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer the state of the account at the end of each of those periods during which there is any movement in the account.

 

(5) A statement under subsection (4) shall be given within the prescribed period after the end of the period to which the statement relates.

 

(6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

As you are aware, a credit agreement that is not properly documented and signed by the consumer is totally unenforceable under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and therefore is a complete defense to any court claim that is issued.

 

 

 

 

 

I will therefore no longer be making payments against the alleged debt as it is unenforceable. I now consider the matter closed and no further correspondence regarding payment will be entered into. If you persist on pursuing payment you will have left me no choice but to report this matter to such regulatory bodies as I see fit.

 

 

 

Yours Faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Following the above letter, they put my account into default, which got me a bit angry:

 

Head of Customer Assistance

MBNA Europe Bank Limited

Stansfield House

Chester Business Park

Chester

CH4 9QQ

 

28th October 2009

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Thank you for your letter dated 22nd October 2009, received 26th October 2009, the contents of which are noted.

 

I am somewhat perplexed as to why you are sending me letters about ‘default notification’ as you have failed to comply with any of my requests for information which in turn has put this account into serious dispute.

 

I would like to draw your attention to the following so as not to be in any doubt about your company’s lack of compliance with my LEGAL request.

 

On 14th September 2009 I made a formal request for a true signed agreement for the alleged account under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/8. On the 29th September 2009 I wrote again highlighting your failure to supply a true signed agreement within the legal timeframe required under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/8 (All correspondence has been by recorded delivery).

 

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document.

 

As you may not be aware , failure to comply with this request within 12 working days renders the alleged debt UNENFORCEABLE in law.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is NOT permitted to take ANY action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a compliant credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

 

 

· May not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

 

· May not add further interest or any charges to the account.

 

· May not pass the account to a third party.

 

· May not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

 

· May not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

 

Be warned, the CCA 1974 is clear that a default can only be issued for breach of a valid, regulated agreement. If there is no agreement, as in this case, then you cannot issue a default as I have not breached any valid, regulated agreement.

 

Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that your continued pursuit is in violation of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40 as well as breaching a number of the OFT Collection Guidelines.

 

It is my intention to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit, including (but not limited to) The Office of Fair Trading, and the Trading Standards.

 

You have 7 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

I look forward to your final decision on this complaint within 21 days. This should include your proposed actions in relation to the lack of a credit agreement.

Sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical, MBNA are clutching at straws, accounts sold that are not viable and have not been so for years.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...