Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry, I may have forgot to get back on this. Please monitor for a reply tomorrow
    • Yes, now its just about getting the WS / Court bundle finalised to send to the court / Evri. I've attached the most recent version of the WS / Court bundle to save having to scroll back up to the previous post (#204) where it was also shared. If you, @BankFodder or anyone else has any feedback on this, i'd be grateful for your thoughts. In my previous post #204, i'd also attached an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at Her mes - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender [origin] and the recipient [destination] - I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice.  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (the sender / recipient) is involved in this transaction. I have also attached this redacted invoice in this post to save having to scroll back up. Happy to get any thoughts and if this invoice is no good, then please let me know.   Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • Does anyone know if I would be allowed to record conversations with health professionals for my own use on my phone without them knowing. I know that we are allowed to record phone calls. I do record some of my phone calls for my own use due to my disability and if anything is said then I am covered. I would only record audio in private area's of myself and the professional dealing with me. I know I could not get and other persons audio in it and I don't intend to. my only other option is to buy a body cam but I am not sure the rules regarding this.I never thought i would have to but things are getting worse Thanks for any guidance 
    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Backdating JSA after being told cant claim


TopB
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4049 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, A friend on my college course refused was JSA based on the reason that "She's in full time education" even though she is not. Thats what the letter said... She originally claimed last October, but this was refused.

 

The topic came up in a session at college today and the tutor said that the course was designed for people on JSA and was infact 15 hours. The tutor then got a letter written up from the college detailing the college course and hours.

 

My friend has had to use her credit card to get by in the months without JSA. (Food, Rent etc) - She tells me this is maxed out and over the limit (Not good for her credit rating).

 

She Reclaimed JSA and was told that it was approved. Could she back date her claim as it wasnt her fault? (She provided her timetable on her first claim):|

 

Any help would be helpful!

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've popped in the link for the legislation surrounding backdated payments below:

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/793/regulation/6/made

 

I have to be honest, I've always been given to believe that it's very, very hard indeed to get JSA backdated. The part of the legislation relevant to your friend would probably be:

the claimant was given information by an officer of the Department of Social Security or of the Department for Education and Employment which led the claimant to believe that a claim for benefit would not succeed;

 

But I'm not sure if the fact that she didn't appeal the decision at the time would go against her on this.

 

At the end of the day, it's got to be worth a try though...hope for the best, prepare for the worst, as they say.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The absolute time limit for appeals is 13 months, so definately appeal. Your will have to prove that she has satisfied 'being available for and actively seeking work'.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys! Funnily enough she got a letter today which tells her they'll back date it from the 28th of january, not from when the very first claim was made. First step is to appeal that decision right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys! Funnily enough she got a letter today which tells her they'll back date it from the 28th of january, not from when the very first claim was made. First step is to appeal that decision right?

 

Appeal the original decision refusing benefit - also the backdating too, but JSA should originally have been awarded. It will be a late appeal of the original decision.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thanks guys. It was back dated for her! She hasn't received payment yet. But she did receive a payment and an accompanying letter (BACS remittance slip). On the letter it said reference to your account... "one time vendor".

 

She's baffled by it... Any ideas as to what the payments for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ellie, it isnt the backdated payment. She has a letter for that with a different figure. This payment is from her local council the letter she got with it says "one time vendor".

 

You're right she has intact got both payments, just a bit confused as to what one is for! It wouldn't be council tax benefit would it? £385 for council tax? Surely it's not that

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did she make a separate application for Housing Benefit in January? This is what could have been processed. As I say she should get a letter if so explaining how the figures are worked out, and the dates. If she is now receiving jsa which isn't included in the decision she will need to tell the council of the fact. What I would do is take the jsa letter to the council, our council asks for a short form to fill in, and then they photocopy any evidence we take them. I don't know of how other councils operate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, the only letter she got was the BACS remittance slip. Yes she did make and application for housing benefit in January. Housing and JSA were applied for together. Ill tell her to take the letter to the council. Hopefully, she will have a job soon!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...