Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all, Love this site and it's no nonsense advice, have dipped in and out of the consumer forums over the years, mostly to assure myself that what I was doing was the right thing when dealing with various businesses (almost 100% success rate, thanks in part to reading and more reading here.). Anyway, the time is almost approaching where I might need to ask for some specific help and I have a couple of queries that I can't see definitively answered. Due to financial mismanagement and severe anxiety issues I stopped paying all unsecured debt in December 2018 (one slipped to the first week in Jan 2019 when the last payment was made having rechecked my bank statement from that period - all my unsecured debt direct debits were cancelled in early Jan 2019). This has left half a dozen debts;  a couple of credit cards, a bank loan, Shop Direct and some Hitachi Finance stuff having been sold on and passing the rounds through the usual suspects, Lowells, Link, PRA Group, others related to them, and then back to them again. I have somehow successfully managed to maintain radio silence and avoided anything more worrying than their begging letters.  I have blocked their phone calls and texts, bumped all emails to the spambox and had a chuckle at their desperate letters.  I've never had anybody at the door.  I have been at the same address since before I defaulted and all correspondence comes to my current home address.  I have NEVER contacted them or admitted any debt. In anticipation of them perhaps ramping up action at the last minute I've had a look at my credit report on Credit Karma (rec'd from this very place) and I see that the default dates on these range from May 2019 to November 2019. Also in preperation I've been reading, reading and reading lots here as advised. Obviously being in Scotland there are a lot fewer posts relating to these matters and it's always quite annoying when OP's do not follow up with any outcome on their cases - how rude! This has also left me a bit confused of when I am able to finally breathe easy (although cancelling all the direct debits in Jan 2019 was the biggest sigh of relief as I knew it was all going to be unmanageable and, well, default one, default all.). I've been reading that defaults should be filed 3-6 months after the missed payment but one of my larger debts was defaulted on 27th August 2019 when the last payment I made was 10th December 2018, meaning the first missed payment was 10th Jan 2019.   My query for now is - when should I infer that these debts are prescribed?  From when the payment was missed, or taking the default date plus 5 years from the credit report?   The three I have with the May date are moot anyway as either way they are gone - some letters from Lowell offering me 90% off to settle is what got me thinking these must have been near SB status, however I have one big 10k+ with a July date and another 10k+ at the end of August so I am feeling a bit anxious again, even though I know there is nothing to worry about with the begging letters.  Reading the various forums I am not sure why the OC's didn't take action against me when I read time and again the surprise that other posters haven't already been taken to court for lesser amounts - I'm also surprised I've avoided any action this long as there are plenty in this forum and sub forum who are whisked off to the court by the beggers minions after only a year or so after defaulting.  There are no CCJ/decrees listed on my credit report and I have not received any such judgements against me.  I still just regularly receive the begging emails to the spambox, the blocked phone calls and the letters from the they.   I'm also reading that there is no need in Scotland to send an LBC so what should I be looking out for to know that the time has come to engage with CCA requests etc?   I'm afraid in a fit I threw a lot of the paperwork out but I have a box of stuff I'm going to go through which may have the original letters from the OC's.   Thanks in advance for any advice.  
    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bryan Carter CCJ Set Aside, Now need help with Defence


matmidgley
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3991 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have posted this on other forums,so I have copied and pasted.

not much in the way of replies and trying to get as much info help as poss first time dealing with this.

 

I sent off a N244 form last week to try and set aside a CCJ issued by Lowell Portfolio 1

 

31 Aug 2008 I moved from an address in south west somerset to the north east in cleveland

 

5 Aug 2010 A CCJ was issued to my old address in somerset without me knowing

 

31 Aug 2011 I received a letter from Lowell Portfolio at my new address, saying " We are Lowell Portfolio 1 ltd, your outstanding account with Barclaycard was sold to us on the 30/04/2008 and we will now be recovering what you owe"

in this letter they do not mention that they had tried to contact me previously or that they had had a CCJ issued against me, (at this date I did not know they had).

I immediately replied with the letter template saying that it was statute barred.

 

23 Sep 2011 I received the reply saying "your account is now closed" and the letter states that they have reviewed the overdue account and discovered that it was statute barred.

 

so I didnt think any more of it and thought it was finished.

 

I got my credit report at the beginning of feb 2013 and decided to ring northampton bulk centre as there was a CCJ, In this phonecall I found out the CCJ was issued by Lowell Portfolio1 on the 5th Aug 2010.

 

Now I did not give Lowell my new address as I did not know they were chasing me for money, I did not receive any letters from them at the old address prior to moving. I also never gave my new address to them for the same reason yet somehow they had it. (Barclaycard did not have the address I had moved about 7 times since the address barclaycard was issued at including being homeless for a period of that)

I Had changed my bank address etc in 05/2009 to my new address, and had been on the electoral roll here since 28/10/2009 so the credit report would of shown this a year before Lowell issued the CCJ at a old address. Im assuming they got the old address from the credit report at that time so they would of seen both.

 

I have sent in the N244 on the grounds that I was not living at that address for 2 years before the CCJ was issued and had not given Lowell the address as I did not know they were chasing me. I attached evidence that I was not living there and also copies of the letters from lowell in 2011.

 

I believe that the debt was statute barred before they issued the CCJ, and when I received the letter in 09/2011 they said the debt was statute barred and account was closed. Surely if it was genuine they would not of agreed and told me a CCJ had been issued and I had to pay the balance?

 

Received a letter from the court this morning 21/02/2013, says the hearing will take place at the court, but then under that it says the hearing of this case will take place by way of telephone.

Any advice from here?

It says I must give the claimants legal representative my telephone number, not sure who this is the DCA is Lowell Portfolio 1,

Also says I must serve all documents to be relied upon at the hearing by fax or email, I sent in my evidence with my N244 im guessing this is what it is asking for?

 

I have written up some more evidence as I have noticed some more details,

such as the letter from Lowell in Aug 2011 the first line is "Introducing Lowell" making it try as seem to me that it was the first time they contacted me, and the reference number that they had for the CCJ is different than the reference number they had on the letter in 2011, how ever both the CCJ and the 2011 letter both have the same credit card number as a secondary reference number.

The amount they are asking for on the CCJ is £991 but the amount they have requested on the 2011 letter is £812.

Its like they are trying to hide the fact they all ready issued a CCJ against me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi when was your last acknowledgement or payment towards the debt before the CCJ was issued?

 

In theory you should get the CCJ set aside due to not being served etc however you have admitted to moving several times and not informing your creditors which MAY go against you.

 

The reason that the CCJ amount is more than the amount in their demand letter is because there are fixed Court and Solicitors fees added to the amount.

 

You need to give your number to the Claimant's solicitors so that they can arrange the telephone hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it was over 6 years before the CCJ was issued, I never made a payment on it as I could not afford to.

 

And what I mean as to the different amounts, the CCJ was issued in 2010 for the amount of £991

 

the letter I received in 2011 they were asking for £812, so they are asking for less in the later letter not mentioning court proceedings or fees.

 

so they were not mentioning the fact of the CCJ previously and were making it seem as it was the first time they had contacted me, or hiding the fact they issued one against me without me knowing

 

I phoned the court and got the solicitors details as Brian Carter, I then phoned there office as I was advised to on leagle seagulls forum.

Who ever was dealing with the case was not there but left details with someone else, they claim they still had my old address even tho letters had been sent to my new one from lowell, they then said the only contact they had from lowell was in OCT 2011 which was to cease chasing the debt on the CCJ. This was 1 month after I told them it was statute barred and received the letter from Lowell saying it was and the account was closed in SEP 2011.

 

So basically I have a CCJ from Lowells solicitors Brian Carter on there behalf, but I also have a letter stating the account is closed as its statute barred from Lowell themselves.

Edited by matmidgley
Link to post
Share on other sites

however you have admitted to moving several times and not informing your creditors which MAY go against you.

 

the first time I moved from the address that the barclaycard was issued to was because I was made homeless so there would be no address to give them, the several after consist of staying on friend & family sofa's so I was not in each address for very long at all

Link to post
Share on other sites

been trying for advice both here and legal seagulls but thread just generally get looked at and no reply :(

 

Bryan Carter were suppose to call me monday, big suprise they didnt.

Been looking for advice if I can send them a threatogram or is this a bad idea?? was thinking something like this

 

(REMOVED)

10 (REMOVED)

B(REMOVED)

C(REMOVED)

T(REMOVED)P

0(REMOVED)3

0(REMOVED)3

Your Ref: L(REMOVED)5

County Court Claim no.(REMOVED)

Date: 26/02/2013

 

 

To whom is dealing with the case,

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to you in regards to the above case,

 

 

I have been instructed by the courts to provide you with my telephone number for the court hearing for the claim listed above, I can advise you this number is 0(REMOVED)3.

All correspondence by your self should be sent to the address listed above.

 

 

I would like to also take this chance to ask if you are going to consent with the application to set aside the judgement on the above case in order to reduce costs for both parties.

 

 

I would also like to note that if you do not consent with the judgement I will be claiming further costs against you, for the application fee's and time spent defending the judgement that should not of been awarded.

These include but are not limited to:

 

Example of costs:

 

 

N244 application cost £80

Stationary £8

Time spent researching relevant law and advice £144

Times spent contacting Courts and claimants by letters and calls £36

Time spent attending telephone hearing £18

Total £286

 

 

 

Failure to reply to this letter I will assume that you will not be consenting to the application to set aside, as of which all further correspondence shall be dealt with by the court.

 

 

Yours

 

 

(REMOVED)

Edited by matmidgley
spelling sucks
Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the above Mat..its considered good practice to agree with the claimant before hearing.....and save both parties further costs.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Thanks for this thread. I am in similar situation I was involved in a commercial lease with 2 others and the business went bust an the landlord is after arrears

I had sent the landlord my current address which is no longer in UK. This was done via email and i show many emails since I sent. T I did not know about the ccj until i had a credit check. I spoke with the law firn and told them of my intentions of setting aside , they now want to see the email. Is it ok to send it to them prior to the hear or even filling out the form? I will be filling out the form tomorrow and just spoke to the firm on Thursday.

 

Thanks

PJC

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

The CCJ was set aside this morning (Bryan Carter did not organise a telephone conference on 2 occasions)

whilst on the phone to the Judge he said I will need to file a defence by the 11th of July, Will I recieve paperwork which I must reply to or do I just need to send in my defence?

should i be requesting any documents from BC, I have none not even the original CCJ paperwork.

Also I have no idea on how to format a defence, is there a guide?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks for the Reply

The background is in a seperate thread but I am unable to fully link.

consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?383248-CCJ-from-Lowell-PF1-Set-aside-phone-hearing&p=4157078#post4157078

 

I do not know what the POC on the original claim were as I never got it.

should I request it from the courts or will I recieve it with and paperwork of the set aside order (assuming that I will get something)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ims. Starting to make sense now...

 

Mat, you said the account was already SB when the CCJ was awarded in 2008. Do you have the paperwork to prove this? Are you absolutely sure of this fact? Tell us more.

 

If this is the case, your defence will be that the account was already SB.

 

Note that the set aside takes the case back to the point of issue, so your last payment must have been before 2002.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have phoned the court and they will send me a copy out today they dont have the original but can send me a judges copy with the POS on,

the dates were no payment since april 2004 (never actually made a payment) CCJ awarded Aug 2010 so it was over 6 years. (not sure if thats same dates as above been doing some date digging since the original post)

I also have a letter from Lowell saying that my account is closed and it is statute barred ,one of the reasons the judge set it aside.

still waiting on a SAR from barclaycard... sent one 23 Feb and another 22 March and have not responded and sent a DSAR on the 6th of June giving 7 days which they still have not responded to

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont have any paperwork with payment dates on as I never made any, I only know the account was opened in april 2004 as they have sent me a PPI form instead of the SAR in feb which is why I had to send another in march.

I dont even know if a default was issued, or what BC has as evidence.

Lowell have told BC to stop chasing the debt from me, If he wants to carry on with the CCJ who is paying for it? Him or lowell, and will he wven bother after I put in a defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s not when the CCJ was awarded, Mat, it’s when the claim was issued, which may be a couple of months prior to the default award.

 

You say the account was opened in April 2004. But if you used the card after this, that will count as acknowledgment. How else would you have aggregated a balance?

 

We really need detailed info to help properly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its missing some info from above that I have not updated.

The first telephone hearing was April and BC didnt set it up, the case was adjourned till today for aother telephone hearing in which BC also did not set up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok the card was opened in april '04, i blew it all on day of arrival and didnt touch it since. the claim was started in july '10 the judge told me that this morning.

the card limit was £250 i was probably close to that, the claim is £991 which Is another area in which I can dispute as I dont know what the rest is from.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...