Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Ignoring my SSP requests


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4177 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have put in a claim for SSP with my employer mid december and despite numerous emails from myself asking about it they have mostly ignored me and fobbing me off.

 

My first day off was the 5th of November and I gave them my fit note on the 19th December and not heard back since.

 

I have had another month off since that period and despite working for a smallish company they don't seem to be doing much.

 

My time off was because of a disability and connected to it. In the mean time I have had letters threatening me with gross misconduct.

 

 

I have been with the company for over 12 months now. I have been emailing HR everyday this week and just been ignored other than a message saying 'sorry I'm snowed under'.

 

I don't get any form of sick pay from them so SSP would be very helpful.

 

Also they had my medical records from last year but they have lost them and want me to give them permission again.

 

Any ideas on what to do?

Edited by redhotitfc
Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to establish firstly that you are eligible for SSP. You certainly satisfy the length of service criteria, so what about earnings? Do you earn more than £107 per week?

 

When did you first notify the employer of your absence? Was it in line with their absence policy? Have you previously had SSP?

 

Providing that you are eligible, and if the employer still refuses to pay SSP, then contact HMRC on 0845 302 1479

 

Absence through disability is irrelevant - what is relevant is that the absence is due to sickness, whatever the cause.

 

I would be questioning how your records can have been 'lost' and expressing concern about their diligence in dealing with your personal data....

 

Tell us more about the threatening letters.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do qualify for it. I followed company procedure and told them from day one and every single day I was off (company procedure). Disability is relevent if they say no.

 

Dragged from the CAB website

 

"If you are off sick because of a disability If you are disabled and your employer refuses to give you sick pay when you are off sick for a reason connected with your disability, they could be breaking the law. You may be able to make a complaint to an employment tribunal for disability discrimination. You may first have to raise a written grievance with your employer first."

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do qualify for it. I followed company procedure and told them from day one and every single day I was off (company procedure). Disability is relevent if they say no.

 

Dragged from the CAB website

 

"If you are off sick because of a disability If you are disabled and your employer refuses to give you sick pay when you are off sick for a reason connected with your disability, they could be breaking the law. You may be able to make a complaint to an employment tribunal for disability discrimination. You may first have to raise a written grievance with your employer first."

 

So have you actually raised a grievance?

 

Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. Disability is irrelevant in terms of eligibility for SSP - clearly everybody should receive SSP whether the cause is directly related to disability or for some other reason.

 

In order to prove discrimination you would need to make a case that the employer is not paying SSP BECAUSE of your disability, ie either that were you to be able bodied you WOULD have been paid, or that other, able bodied colleagues have been paid in similar circumstances whereas you have not. As the employer seems not to be telling you the reason, whilst it may be possible to BELIEVE that you are discriminated against, he might have a different argument and we need t find out what that was.

 

So. Formal grievance, outlining the fact that you reported your absence in line with company policy, and that you have provided medical evidence of your condition making you unfit for work, and follow this up with a call to HMRC. If they are still unwilling, or believe that you are not eligible, then they must provide you with form SSP1 so that you can claim ESA.

 

Of course if you can prove, or make a reasonable accusation that the employer is treating you differently purely due to your disability then there may well be consequences.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oops, missed that! I would be dismissing you for going awol, not paying SSP! 45 days is ridiculous!

  • Haha 1

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that would be rather risky for them to dismiss me as I contacted them every day. Also when I am ill because of a seizure I can't get to the doctors as it's dangerous. I get the DLA mobility component as a result of this. They do know this as I have explained it before to them. Otherwise I would get a fit note right away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still a long time not to put in a sick note, if you are that bad that you cant go to pick it up why cant someone slse? or why not have a Drs visit at home, contacting the company isnt enough IMO you need to have sent in the note

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Drs can issue sick notes without seeing the patient just by speaking to you over the phone, i feel that you are making excuses for not getting it in in time. are you seriously saying you were too ill to leave the house even if accompanied for 40+ days ? I know seriously sick and disabled people that go out in that length of time.TBH if you were that ill you should have been in hospital IMO

Edited by assisted blonde

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you actually asked the direct question 'Why are you not paying me SSP'? Have you spoken to HMRC?

 

I feel that this isn't going to resolve itself - you need to take action for yourself. If you ask the employer for a reason, they HAVE to advise this in writing. If they won't pay you SSP they HAVE to provide you with form SSP1. HMRC have the power to adjudicate on the decision to not pay you SSP and this is binding on the employer. If you cannot get SSP then you need to claim ESA.

 

The employer cannot refuse to pay SSP for not providing a fit note - providing that you notified the original absence on time.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...