Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4134 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Thanks to anyone who may be able to help. Just a brief summary of my situatiion:

 

I had a debt which got transferred to sheriffs office (was a genuine mix up of addresses and I never got a court hearing). They eventually visited and I paid £1700 of the £4500 owed. I agreed to pay £400 per month with the help of my family. In truth, we could never afford £400 but we panicked because they threatened to remove goods etc.

 

I then contacted the court regarding what we could afford (can't remember what form I filled out) suggesting £50 per month. They set a hearing but the original solicitors dealing with the debt vacated the hearing and accepted monthly repayments of £50. 6 months on, I haven't missed a payment and recently increased my offer to £65 per month.

 

The sheriffs office have now contacted me stating I have missed several payments with them. They are getting a bit rude and arsey over it, saying I should be paying them.

 

As I now have an agreement in place, can they do anything re offering £400 per month?

 

Thanks for any help and advice, much appreciated.

 

Dean

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that you contact the solicitors for the claimant and advise them that you have been making payment as ordered by the court and you may want to ask them if THEY have been receiving any of the payments !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will need to advise the HCEO that you are making payment directly. It is often the case that that some solicitors may take direct payment but not inform the HCEO as they do not want t be liable for any fees. Most HCEOs will have T&Cs stating that all payments should come to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want to complicate things but.....you say the amount being pursued was £4000, what of that figure was the actual debt owed to the Claimant ? by that I mean the debt alone without the fees to enforcement?

 

Because you never received the summons you had the opportunity to apply to set aside the judgment (N244), this meant you could have attended a hearing to defend the debt and the fees associated with it....if set aside had been given you could have, at that moment in time, made a reasonable offer to repayments.....alternatively you could have applied for variation to payments (N245)and stay of execution to the writ(N244)..it sounds as if the solicitor has 'persuaded' you not to go back to court by suggesting the creditor accepted your offer to pay £50 and those payments have been maintained ...but who have you been paying because as HCEO says the Claimant appears to be accepting payments direct from you cutting out the HCEO and by doing that, it can be argued you are not responsible for the HCEO fees?

 

I hope you can understand this process but if not please come back and ask any questions you can think of. Meanwhile please follow HEO's advice and write to the enforcement office to tell them you have agreement with the claimant to pay them/solicitors direct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The solicitors I refer to are those of the claimant. They passed their debt on to their solicitors. The fee of just over £4000 included those fees of the HCEO's. I let them in as I never had any intention to avoid the debt had I known. I did apply to the court, we filled out income and expenditure forms and we could only afford £50. A re-hearing was set, but the claimants vacated the hearing as we agreed a settlement. I have been paying the money to the claimants solicitors ever since.

 

Thanks for your help so far,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok...I think you need to contact the claimant in the first instance....ask how much of the amount you have paid has been received by them?

 

Next you would be better to get this back into Court and go ahead (regardless of what the solicitor has to say) with getting the Stay of Execution, it would also be of benefit to you to get the variation to payments set down with the Court that assures there can be no mistake at a future date to how much you agree to pay,more importantly WHO you are to make payment to....contact the sheriffs office as per previous advice and advise them you have been making payment to the solicitor as per the agreement you have with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been paying the money to the claimants solicitors ever since.

 

Hi,

 

This is the root of your problem. Once the Sheriffs Office has been instructed by a creditor or their solicitors all payments towards the debt must be made to them.

 

If your creditor's solicitors have been accepting payments from you, provdie the Sheriffs Office with the details (i.e. payment amounts and dates if you have them, plus make sure you tell them they have agreed the new payment plan of £50 per month) and they will take it up with the solicitors for you.

 

I do agree with the others though, you should try and get this back in to court so the payment plan becomes formalised and you avoid the costly bailiff fees.

 

My advice, make an application to set aside the judgment at court (costs £45 off the top of my head) and lodge an income and expenditure form showing what you can afford to repay(go to the CAB and complete one there as they carry some weight in court).

 

I hope this helps.

 

Dodge

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...