Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wow thats incredible. Thank you so much
    • If the purchaser denies having received it then sue P2G. If you simply don't hear anything more from the purchaser then you have the purchaser's name and address – and frankly for £48 I would go ahead and sue. As long as you have good proof of delivery then your chances of success are probably better than 95% and frankly the purchaser would probably put their hands up as they would effectively be being sued for the civil equivalent of theft. I wouldn't let it go if I were you. It would be a good exercise for you and gives you confidence the next time something comes up which is may be much more valuable
    • Thank you again Emmzzi for your insight. Not only did I do the work, but as a maths tutor delivering financial literacy workshops under the Govt Multiply project, the college were paid £400 for each student I recruited, which makes it an even bigger kick in the teeth! I spoke to Citizens Advice Bureau on Friday who advised me to go back to ACAS for advice and assistance, as ACAS are the experts in employment matters. They did also mention small claims court, as being more straightforward and less complex, but surely their solicitor would just contest this and I would lose the £80 court fee? If I did submit a claim through the small claims court, would I just leave the employment tribunal running until the outcome? The deadline for me to submit my schedule of loss is tomorrow, so I will submit today so that they cannot hold me in breach.
    • Ive just checked the tracking again and its actually out for delivery today! Anyway,  I refunded the buyer on Ebay off my own back on the 2nd of June they havent opened a case or anything like that so surely i cant take action against either the buyer or P2G/ Evri can i ? Id hope the buyer would see fit and pay but you know what people are like these days ... Once its delivered I'll send him a polite message asking for payment but i suspect there'll be no reply      
    • Thanks for this update. Let's not if you have any more difficulty – in particular if you have difficulty getting paid back from the purchaser. We can help you either against the parcel delivery courier or against the purchaser
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

mad dog v natwest


mad dog
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6255 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After being charged £38 for the return of a £10 d/d which put me £3 o/drawn, and getting the usual "sorry can't help you", on the phone. Have decided to take the plunge and try to get all my charges back from nat west. I have prepared the prelim letter, but even after reading through as much of the site as i could over the last week or so, i still have a question, When sending the list of charges with the prelim letter do i need to use the spreadsheet or can i just list date, reason, amount? Sorry this is so long winded and apologies if this seems a simple question. any advice most welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ian cognito

It is wise to use the spreadsheet as this also works out the interest for you for the later stages when you go to court, as you probably will have to. When you send the spreadsheet into the bank, you can 'hide' (or take a copy and delete) the two last columns that show the interest then you will still have them when you need them.

 

If you need any help with the spreadsheet, please shout!

Link to post
Share on other sites

At last got started prelim letter sent 17/10 (recorded delivery) suppose its just a case of waiting for the "no chance" letter now.

 

You never know sometimes they pay up at this stage, the process can sometimes be long but it is worth it in the end.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope someone can help me. I recieved the no chance letter from natwest today, (only took a week) which surprised and worried me a bit in it they mention that my account is a "step account" with no facility for an overdraught does this affect my case? The other question is as i am not overly familiar with computers how do i find the start of my thread instead of having to search through pages of messages? Thanks for any help or advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Sent lba on 06/11, but when i just looked at my saved copy realised i had dated it wrong so will resend tommorrow hope it doesn't confuse those nice people at natwest people.My own fault guess i shouldn't try writing important letters in the middle of the night. I will keep updating this just to keep an eye on the timescale, and to keep me on the right track.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reference the above post, can any one advise me as to wether i should wait for the 14 days from the original letter to see if they reply, or send the amended one, as i don't want to give them a reason to throw my claim out of court if it gets that far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ian cognito

I doubt your case would get thrown out of court because you wrongly dated a letter, if it was the case of an incorrect date on a contract that had direct implications on its conditions then it could be important but we are all human and allowed to make mistakes, even the banks do that. Correct the mistake if it will make you feel better but it doesn't have to be done as part of your 'timetable' or the processes suggested on this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recieved letter offering half of what i'm claiming yesterday, so today will send the "thanks but no thanks" letter and see what happens. Although the letter was signed for s. higley it came from borehamwood. Am i right in assuming that the reply should be sent to borehamwood, or should i keep everything going to bishopsgate. I realise that this has probably cropped up before but i have read so much my head is spinning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its best to send all correspondance to bishopsgate (registered office) until told otherwise!

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

as i have been busy with one thing or another am only just getting round to sending off the mcol paperwork i will try and keep updating the progress of my claim. I dont know if its because i'm claiming against them but natwest have paid a d/d which made me overdrawn without charging me, although a couple of months ago they would have bounced it and charged me, is this a ploy to make me feel guilty and stop my claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

be careful mad dog I think you will find an additional £30 referral fee next month to claim back if it took the account over your overdraft by £26 or more, unless its a STEP account.

I came I saw I helped. I could do no more.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

had a 38 pound charge for going over drawn 22 pence. i have a step account, and im claiming back 2500 and i will start another claim against them if they dont refund all the charges from the date of the claim too

18/10/06 sent lba for current account

18/10/06 claim issued against NatWest for £2,495.00

30/09/06 O'Neill V NatWest - declined offer of £1216.00 sent responce to settlement letter

30/09/06 O'neill v Woolwich plc mortgage account sent Data Protection Act notice for not replying

30/09/06 Oneill v citifinancial sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

30/09/06 O'neill V Capital One sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

 

If u can do it, SO CAN I!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

With the referral charge, it is not charged on a step account so if the DD/SO/Cheque is paid then no other charges would be levied as it would on a current account, ie Unarranged Borrowing Fee, or Referral fee as the step account is exempt from this charge. Only charge that is not exempt is returning an item upaid which as the above two posters have said is £38

I came I saw I helped. I could do no more.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...