Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4154 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

Looking for some advice.

 

I have recieved a letter from Marston saying they had a debt of 314.00 passed to them from Magristate court. This letter arrived 2 weeks after it was dated. It said i had 7 days to pay. They said they have a distress warrant

 

I had no idea what this is for. I rang them and then confirmed it was 14.00 from not having a tv licence. The orignal fine was for 264.00. I genuiely didnt know i hadnt paid 14.00 of it.I know i was in the wrong not having a tv licence but i had just had a baby less than 3 months before and had only moved into my first home alone3 weeks prior to the tv licence man at the door, was still finding my feet! The offence 2009 and I had paid 250 and had not had any correspodence since

 

I asked where the other 300 came from they confrimed it was their 85 admin fee and 215 attendance fee. I explained i had not recieved any correspondence regarding this from the court as i had moved address

 

I rang the court they said they couldnt do anything it was in the hands of bailiffs but that the bailiffs can return it they cannot request it back.

 

The next day a note was put through from bailiff and she said she would be back at 7 that evening.

 

I rang her and explained that i did not have the 314.00 but that i can pay the fine straight away and their fees in installments. she said no i wil come take your goods. I explained all i own is clothes and children stuff as the 2nd occupant is the owner of all other items and that he has proof of purchase. she said that fine i will issue a warrant for your arrest. I asked if she will return it she said no.

 

I contuined trying to speak to the court and the bailiffs and just kept hitting brick walls.

 

I have sent a letter to the court manager and copied int he bailiffs, explained i never recieved any correspodence. explained al i have done above and included a income and expenditure as after my share or bills rent etc... i have 8.00 per month left. Ive also questioned the bailliffs fee for the size of the amount owing.

 

I had a reponse from Marston confirming it was with their complaint department. As of yet I havent had a response from the court but I rang and they said it with their legal department and cant tell me how long it will take.

 

The next day (today) i have had another note put through the door saying she may return with locksmiths as i am refusing to pay. WHich i am not as explained above.

 

Ive considered sending a postal order for the fine amount of 14.00 to the court but have been told it will be passed to the bailiffs.

 

Im at a loss at what to do. I am trying to pay them but cant pay in full. I dont feel i should have to pay these massive fees for such a small debt. The distress warrant was requested on 25th may 2012. Ive read they only have 180 days to execute is this correct? Because its 200 plus day now.

And can she get a locksmith or will she have to contact the court. because surely they wont agree because they've got contact from me?

 

Any suggestions would help

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is true that a Magistrates Court Fine for a criminal offence does carry the right of forced entry. However this is mainly for those who are persistent offenders who treat the system as a joke. For your own circumstances it is more of a threat & a lever to try and make you pay. The Bailiff does not care about anything but the cash, so far you have done the right things. The Court should have sent a Final Steps Notice to you but that has probably gone to your old address, hopefully they should take notice of your present I&E.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have said in your post that the bailiff advised you that she would arrange for an arrest warrant be issued. Is this correct?

Frankly, I am astonished to hear that a court has issued a Distress Warrant for just £14 because, it would be clear to the court that the fees being charged by the bailiff company would be wholly disproportionate to the amount of the debt.

My personal view is that a Formal Complaint should be sent to the Court Manager as soon as possible.

As Ploddertom has correectly stated, you are certainly not a criminal offender. You had almost paid the court fine in full. It would seem that discretion has NOT been applied by the courts. This is dreadful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have said in your post that the bailiff advised you that she would arrange for an arrest warrant be issued. Is this correct?

Frankly, I am astonished to hear that a court has issued a Distress Warrant for just £14 because, it would be clear to the court that the fees being charged by the bailiff company would be wholly disproportionate to the amount of the debt.

My personal view is that a Formal Complaint should be sent to the Court Manager as soon as possible.

As Ploddertom has correectly stated, you are certainly not a criminal offender. You had almost paid the court fine in full. It would seem that discretion has NOT been applied by the courts. This is dreadful.

 

Thank you

 

Do you know weather it is worth me sending a postal order for 14.00

 

I have already send a letter to the court manager explaining about threatening me with an arrest warrant. And about the fees for such a small amount. I am hoping that they accept that I want to pay the fine amount of 14.00

. I'm just concerned they will use a locksmith until the court deal with my letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a letter through the door from marstons over a parking fee I did not pay, the fine initially was around £100 and now marstons have posted saying I owe over £400!!? Is this right, can they add these charges?

 

It is best you start your own thread for this as it will only confuse posting on anothers thread. best to tell as much as you can so a clearer picture can be built up. The link below will take you to start your own.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=168

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...