Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
    • Thank you so much. Yes, I wish I had done my research and not paid. It's all for the same car park. Here is one of the original PCNs, they are all the same bar different dates. PCN-22.03.24-1.pdf PCN-22.03.24-2.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Complaining to the FOS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4155 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Couldn't really think of an appropriate title, but, I'm after some more advice from you fine people.

 

Basically, I'm about to make a complaint about a PDL to the FOS. The complaint will involve 2 accounts so I was wondering if it would be acceptable to make one complaint per account or should it just be one,covering the 2 accounts?

 

Thanks - Lee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lee,

Not sure if the same applies to PDL's as banks, but I lodged 2 complaints against HBOS on both a Bank Account and Credit Card. Both were acknowledged separately but a letter followed a week later confirming they were being merged into a single complaint.

Good luck with FOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lee,

Not sure if the same applies to PDL's as banks, but I lodged 2 complaints against HBOS on both a Bank Account and Credit Card. Both were acknowledged separately but a letter followed a week later confirming they were being merged into a single complaint.

Good luck with FOS.

 

Thanks Toptrapper.

 

I'll send them in as 2 seperate complaints and I'm sure they'll merge them :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So I've not yet complained as I thought I would wait and see how long they took to reply and as yet still no reply.

 

However, my wife did get an email today from Credit Resource Solutions Ltd claiming that they are acting for Lending Stream and and that they are adding interest. This seems unfair as they are the ones ignoring me.

 

Has anyone dealt with this company before and is sending this information by email good enough in regards to data protection as they themselves wrote on the email 'Not you? Send us a quick email to let us know' - surely that's admitting the email isn't a secure method of delivery.

 

Thanks - Lee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DCA cant add interest if they dont own the debt. They are acting on behalf of a creditor so only the creditor can add extra interest.

 

As for the email, it might be best to give the ICO a heads up. They cant write out a full letter with personal details, then put in small print at the bottom "not you? blah blah". Although if you have used that email to sign up for the service and have answered their queries on it before, they can consider it the most current form of contact information.

 

Also, you are well within your rights to ask for written correspondence only via royal mail. Although a lot of lenders are solely web based to keep their costs right down.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Banks for the reply renegadeimp.

 

Yeah - it just seems a little silly to say 'if this isn't you' etc and then divulge loads of info in the email. They've ready aknowledged it might not be secure.

 

As for adding the interest it seems a little unfair to be able to ignore our many attempts to come to some sort of agreement whilst adding the interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is unfair. There is guidance from the OFT that states they shouldnt do it. While its not a legal requirement, it is part of the guidance used to give them their credit licence.

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/consultations/OFT664Rev_Debt_collection_g1.pdf

 

Have a read of that. It's a little long, but if you feel that the lender has gone against any of the guidance, write out a formal complaint, and also copy in the OFT. The OFT wont usually give you a personal response unless they find the lender has been seriously misleading people. But your complaint will be added to the many others that are used to decide whether a lender gets their licence renewed, or when the OFT needs to add restrictions to the lenders credit licence.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - I'll take a look at the link later. I've already made a formal complaint to Lending Stream regarding them ignoring me.

 

Would I have to make a seperate complaint regarding this or should I just add it to the one I'm sending FOS? Just wondering as its a seperate matter that has occurred after my original complaint?

 

Thanks again :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. If you titled that complaint "Formal complaint", then they have to issue a final response to you within 8 weeks. If they dont, or they give you the response earlier, you can then escalate the complaint to the FOS.

 

Just remember, unless it is very serious, the FOS wont normally get involved until you have a final response, or the 8 week time limit has passed.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's well over 8 weeks since I complained - however, bearing in mind what these companies get up to is ignoring my formal complaint regarded as important?

 

Another thing that confuses me is that I see people saying ignore the Dca and deal with the OC but then they ignore you while at the same time making themselves richer!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the 8 weeks ahve passed, then write a full complaint to the FOS detailing everything thats happened. Dont ramble in it, stick to specific points to make it clear and concise. As for your last sentence, thats exactly how PDL's operate and one more reason why we advise people not to use them.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

As for your last sentence, thats exactly how PDL's operate and one more reason why we advise people not to use them.

I hear you there :)

 

We're down to our last 2. The other being cash genie. I've a thread in their sub section as well where I was advised to stop paying as I've already paid enough. However, I now know that's incorrect advice.

 

Thanks for the advice as always :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...