Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Blame Apple for completely changing how macOS apps needed to be written and verified overnight with Catalina.
    • Oh yeah... So there is. ..    Hopefully it won't try to upgrade 😂😂
    • There's the ability to download origin for macOS Mojave and older right on the EA Website. www.ea.com/origin-for-mac      
    • Hello All, I was hoping for some help with a  Claim Form received yesterday 15h May 2024.  I have read lots of threads but I just want to check what I am doing. I have acknowledged service noting my intention to defend all of the claim and I have left the contest jurisdiction un-checked. I will today/tomorrow issue a CCA request with a £1 postal order to the claimant and a CPR 31:14 to the solicitor.  For the CCA which section should I use? I am not sure which section Paypal Credit would come under. If the claim was issued on the 9th May am I correct with my defence filing date of the 11th June? Is there anything else I need to do? Thanks in advance   Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre, Northampton Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio I Ltd How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self (just 1) Date of issue –  9th May 2024 Defence filing date: Tuesday 11th June?? Particulars of Claim What is the claim for  The claim is for the sum of £255.69 due by the Defendant under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a PayPal account with an account reference of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)  The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 15-09-21, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £0.00. The Claimant claims the sum of £255.69 What is the total value of the claim? £340.69 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? Not applicable Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? PayPal credit account When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After April 2007  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, shows as defaulted.  Registered when it was bought by Lowell Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Cant find a letter that say so Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  Not sure Why did you cease payments? Financial difficulties and mental health issues What was the date of your last payment? ? Mid 2019 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No
    • In addition to the advice and questions asked by my site team colleague above, where did you get the template from which you used to reply to the letter of claim?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

caught in Primark and cautioned by Police - now RLP after money - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4196 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My girl friend was at Primark, she got caught stealing. Was taken to a room by Security and since she didnt have a photographic evidence with her , police were called who cautioned her, she signed a letter by the police.

 

Primark sent separate details to the RLP and said they will make their recovery from there.

 

Question is:

- What to expect from the RLP?

- How much money should she pay to the RLP.

 

She had apologized and vowed never ever to steal again. this was her first time and she regrets it fully. But now I need to help her out. I have no experience of dealing with RLP before.

 

At Primakr she made a formal apology to the security in the presence of the Police . Is the RLP still going to come after her?

 

The things she took, they were not damaged other then the price tags , I think she took off the tags off one of the products.

 

Is Primark going to take unnecessary action against her if she refuses to deal with RLP?

 

 

 

Also , will she be able to shop at Manchester store?

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

Answers:

 

- What to expect from the RLP?

 

Lots of letters full of faux legalese. You can either send a simple denial of liability, and then ignore them, or just ignore them from the outset. Do not phone RLP in any circumstances.

 

- How much money should she pay to the RLP?

 

Nothing, zilch, nada, zero, zip.

 

 

She has been dealt with by the police, who are the correct people to deal with thieves. There is no place for any other process such as RLP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much Scarlet,

 

Question that comes to mind is that Police cautioned her and she signed some letter.

 

Now I read on this website that RLP will be acting on behalf of their client, Primark. Does that mean that Primark can go back to the police and ask them to come after my girlfriend because she refused to give the amount that RLP charged, or refused to respond to RLP in anyway.

 

Also, what is Primark's role in this while thing? they have banned her from going into any Primark stores plus asked for a verbal apology in the presence of the Police. Girlfriend apologized. Will Primark still continue to haunt her through RLP and Police?

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does that mean that Primark can go back to the police and ask them to come after my girlfriend because she refused to give the amount that RLP charged, or refused to respond to RLP in anyway.

 

RLP has no official connection with the criminal justice system. They are just a company that sends out speculative invoices.

 

Also, what is Primark's role in this while thing? they have banned her from going into any Primark stores plus asked for a verbal apology in the presence of the Police. Girlfriend apologized. Will Primark still continue to haunt her through RLP and Police?

 

It sounds as if the police will take no further action. RLP will send lots of aggressive demands and silly letters, but they can be ignored.

 

If you are worried, go and see CAB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks yet again Scarlet. Question now is :

 

- Can Primark take any further action against my GF, for failure to pay any costs?

- I was reading on the CAB website, if one admits and accepts caution given by the police , then one has admitted to their folly.

- Does that mean its now easy for Primark to make a Criminal case in the court?

 

 

I read in another thread that retailer can bring on criminal charges. Does it make a strong court case for them specially when a police caution has been given and theft admitted and apologized for , by the person?

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks yet again Scarlet. Question now is :

 

- Can Primark take any further action against my GF, for failure to pay any costs? - no

- I was reading on the CAB website, if one admits and accepts caution given by the police , then one has admitted to their folly. - still does not give RLP any powers to demand anything.

- Does that mean its now easy for Primark to make a Criminal case in the court? - no

 

I read in another thread that retailer can bring on criminal charges.

Does it make a strong court case for them specially when a police caution has been given

and theft admitted and apologized for ,

by the person?

 

if primark have not comented or written

 

i'd very much doubt it

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dx100, sorry I didnt understand when you wrote : Primark have not commented or written?

 

Do you mean they will first write to my GF if they want to prosecute? if they decide to do that after RPL fails to collect any money from us, then wouldnt they get a chance to add in more costs and legal fees?

 

Please can you clarify what you meant by the comment.. many thanks ... really really appreciate all this help and advise ..

Also. is there a set timeframe within which Primark can make a court case if and only if they decide to? I believe they have sufficient CCTV footage against my GF , so just confirming .

 

 

In the current situation, can we safely assume that after being cautioned by the Police, and totally ignoring the RLP or writing to them the simple line that we are not liable for any costs to them or "their client" , The matter came to an end.

 

 

GF told me she scratched the bar code on a few items and took the tag off one of them. though none of the products were damaged and were fully recovered by them. Does the scratching of the barcode and taking off the tag equate to "damaged goods"?

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

if primrk wanted to prosecute they would have done it already

 

RLP are NOTHING to do with them

 

they prob dont even know about it.

 

you need to type in primark in our search top right

 

and have a read

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks mate,if primark dont have anything to do with rpl, then why did they hand over a print out of intent for civil recovery with rpl's logo on the letter?

 

 

Also , please can someone advise me on , whether we should send them a letter with the following text :

 

"Having now had an opportunity to take advice, my position is that any liability to you or any company you claim to represent is denied.

No further correspondence will be entered into with you."

 

Given that Primark does have CCTV footage that they can use against us and GF was cautioned by Police .. will the above letter sent to RPL be applicable to our situation?

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

Repetetive question, repetetive answer:

 

You can either send a simple denial of liability, and then ignore them, or just ignore them from the outset.

 

RLP may issue shop security staff with forms with either their logo or the retailer's, or both. It doesn't make their demands any more legitimate.

 

Read some of the other threads on this forum- the answers to your questions are there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Having now had an opportunity to take advice, my position is that any liability to you or any company you claim to represent is denied.

No further correspondence will be entered into with you."

 

Given that Primark does have CCTV footage that they can use against us and GF was cautioned by Police .. will the above letter sent to RPL be applicable to our situation?

 

In the Oxford case there was no denial that shoplifting took place just that damages were not recoverable under civil law, the Judge whilst having some sympathy with the retailer, agreed.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much All,

 

Just a quick update , I called the CAB and they said the Caution will be seen on GF's CRB records for at least 5 years. After which time it will be deemed as spent. Its such a heavy price to pay for a first time offender. She's been crying nonstop since yesterday ..

 

Also I asked the CAB, whether Primark can take this matter any further. They said no they will not. They called the Police on the spot and she was Cautioned. That was the end of the matter as far as Primark are concerned.

 

Regards RLP , they said what many friends here said , Ignore them completely and reference was given of the Oxford case.

 

I asked if the Caution can be contested in anyway. They said no, because the offence was admitted to.

 

So now that everything is in perspective GF's worry is around her CRB and the Caution .. Can it hinder her holiday travel to international countries? Obviously looks like she wont be getting it easy way in obtaining a job because most employers do a CRB check anyways and the minute they will find out they will simply refuse her application . Am I right in thinking that she is in quite a trouble now? also what happens after 5 years when the Caution becomes "spent" .. is this going to mark her forever ?

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

and now the question of being banned. GF's own family and I , we shop heavily at Primark , now with Christmas approaching GF wont be able to join us for shopping.

Anyone knows how long this ban is enforced for?

 

I called up the HeadOffice of Primark to ask for company procedure and they said only the manager of the concerned store can decide if he wants to ban forever or for a certain timeframe .. they said they dont have a company policy of any sort on that.

 

Would it be wise to call the manager of the store and make a request to reduce the ban from a lifetime to maybe a few months?

 

 

Also, say after 2-3 months if GF does go with me to Primark , will they recognize her? I have read here on the forums that the security guards are the key people who are trained to recognize faces , if supposing they recognize her , will it have serious consequences for her? Primark HO people said they use a security company to hire guards and security services .. if the guards change after a while , will it still be equally risky for GF to visit Primark?

 

She is regretting this whole incident extremely and obviously will behave well in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

I have a quick question please. GF was cautioned by Police after being caught shoplifting by Primark.

 

Some people told me Caution is a serious issue specially when one is taken to the Police Station and taken a picture of and finger printed.

 

In her case she was asked to sign a form at the Primark premises and administered a caution. After checking her passport and ID she was asked to leave.

 

She was told she was being cautioned for theft . While she was caught shoplifting. Does the wording of the offence make a difference?

 

What is the difference between both these types of caution procedures? Is she is serious trouble with respect to her CRB checks and employability for the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

I have a quick question please. GF was cautioned by Police after being caught shoplifting by Primark.

 

Some people told me Caution is a serious issue specially when one is taken to the Police Station and taken a picture of and finger printed.

 

In her case she was asked to sign a form at the Primark premises and administered a caution. After checking her passport and ID she was asked to leave.

 

She was told she was being cautioned for theft . While she was caught shoplifting. Does the wording of the offence make a difference?

 

What is the difference between both these types of caution procedures? Is she is serious trouble with respect to her CRB checks and employability for the future.

I thought that cautions were only done at a police station, usually by a reasonably senior officer. If your GF was not taken to the police station then this might have just been a warning ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

threads merged

 

keep to one thread on this please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought that cautions were only done at a police station, usually by a reasonably senior officer. If your GF was not taken to the police station then this might have just been a warning ...

 

Sorry Dx, I thought it was a separate topic .. apologies for inconvenience caused.

 

 

Grumpy, GF called police station this morning and asked if they could tell her what exactly she signed , as in , the name of the form .. but Police didnt ask for any details to check up and simply said it was a caution and for any further questions she should contact her solicitor ! Its very strange though. Is there any other authority that she can call and ask what exactly is on her record?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, Folks, need your advise.

 

Seriously thinking of giving the store manager a ring and apologize for what happened and request that the ban be reduced.

 

You reckon that would work at all?

 

EErr..Nope

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok , I am in a bit of a struggle here .. so GF hasnt stopped crying and panicking since the Primark issue happened, today I have asked her what is worrying her so much , the issue is more or less over.

 

 

Now i am even more worried about what to do .. already she's got a caution on her record (after being caught at Primark ) , as a result she will be turned down in many jobs in her field. What are the chances of her getting in trouble again? somebody please help and advise me , this is getting to my nerves now.

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

please someone advice me , I am feeling anxious about this whole thing now ..

 

 

Will Citizens Advice Bureau be able to advice on this?

 

I dont know if I should even be asking them about this knowing that she is guilty..

Free solicitors advice?

 

I have trailed over the internet and cant find much info

 

.. Seriously wondering now,

can police convict her for a previous offence,

 

 

anything else I can do to seek advice and read more on the topic?

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

pers i'd stop worrying about all of it

 

nothing is going to happen

 

and i doubt [unless the same staff are on duty]

 

that she'll get any problems in using the store.

 

all they could do is just ask her to leave.

 

i think the police 'perhaps' being involved before is a white herring because of the worrying.

 

forget it all and get on with your lives!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much Dx , really really appreciate your advice. I guess its natural to get shaken specially when one has never before fallen in trouble of any kind ..

 

 

We have even been thinking of going to the retailer and returning them the stuff she picked. But then someone mentioned if we do that, we are inviting trouble and dropping axe on our own feet.

 

 

anyways, you are right, we need to calm down. Just out of curiosity, someone shoplifts and then leaves the store without being caught. Can they be checked by Police at a later date?

Edited by charliechaplin100
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...