Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Statutory interest applied to judgement debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4220 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I read articles, threads etc. all over the internet about CCA 1974 provisions and that how statutory interest cannot be applied to post judgement debt relating to this act.

 

However,

 

I've just received a settlement figure which has had 8% slapped on it!

 

I've just called the solicitors in question and they informed me that the debt was over £5,000

and and that because it had been through the court system and made final (my understanding of the explanation given),

any CCA 1974 provision was overruled and irrelevant.

 

Please could somebody put me out of my misery and explain what is going on.Many thanks for any assistance.

Edited by Borris the Bold
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Borris and welcome to CAG.

 

If the Claimant requested section 69 interest within their Particulars of claim on a claim over 5K then they are entitled to add 8 % up and until judgment.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

Many thanks for your reply.

 

You say 'up' and 'until', so I'm assuming after judgment this interest cannot be applied.

It's really shocking because I was quoted by solicitors representing Robinson Way & Co Ltd. £21,635.59

which differs somewhat from that on the original Court Charging Order, which is £12,294.03.

 

I believe that it is only the amount shown on the final charging order that must be paid to clear a restriction.

 

Kind regards,Borris

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post judgment interest can apply if it is within the terms and conditions of the credit agreement...but it wouldn't be 8% that is for sec69 only.Its only the amount on the judgment that must be paid to clear the restriction.

So whatever the £9341.56 is....is a figment of their imagination.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post judgment interest can apply if it is within the terms and conditions of the credit agreement...but it wouldn't be 8% that is for sec69 only.Its only the amount on the judgment that must be paid to clear the restriction.

So whatever the £9341.56 is....is a figment of their imagination.

 

Sorry Andy what is sec69?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are claiming for a fixed amount of money, you can also claim interest on the amount outstanding. This is usually referred to as 'section 69 interest'.

 

If both parties are businesses and the debt relates to a commercial transaction, then it may be more appropriate to use the provisions of the Late Payment of Commercial Debts Act. This allows for a higher rate of interest and for additional debt collection charges. Details can be found at http://www.late-payment-law.co.uk. Do not use this, if either you or the claimant is a private individual.

 

To claim section 69 interest you first have to work out the total amount of your claim - excluding interest and court fees. You are entitled to claim interest at 8% per annum on this amount. Work out the 'daily rate' by multiplying 'the amount of your claim' x 0.00022. You also need to count up the number of days from when the money became due up to the date on which you issue the claim. Multiply the daily rate by the number of days to work out the 'interest so far'. Then drop each of these numbers into the following paragraph:

 

The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year, from [date when the money became due] to [date of issue of claim] of £[interest so far] and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of [daily rate].

This paragraph should then be included in your particulars of claim, probably as the last paragraph.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy for this information.

 

 

It was for a Capital One loan.

 

 

 

Final Charging Order

 

On 6 October 2009, DISTRICT JUDGE HAYES sitting at Norwich County Court, The Law Courts, Bishopgate, Norwich, Norfolk, NR13 1UR

 

heard The Representative for the Claimant and the Defendant not attending

 

and the court orders that

 

1. The charge created by the order made on the 29 June 2009 shall continue.

 

 

2. The interest of the defendant in the asset described in the schedule below stand charged with payment of the sum of £12,294.03 the amount now owing under a judgment or order given on 06 April 2009 together with any further interest becoming due and £218.00 the costs of the application.

 

3. The costs are to be added to the judgment debt.

 

4. The Claimant has agreed not to apply for an Order of sale for so long as the Defendant pays £5.00 per month to the Claimant in respect of the judgment debt.

 

The Schedule

 

The address of the land or charged property is XXXXXXXXXXXXX the title to which is registered at H.M Land Registry under Title No. XXXXXXXX.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2. The interest of the defendant in the asset described in the schedule below stand charged with payment of the sum of £12,294.03 the amount now owing under a judgment or order given on 06 April 2009 together with any further interest becoming due and £218.00 the costs of the application.

 

3. The costs are to be added to the judgment debt.

 

4. The Claimant has agreed not to apply for an Order of sale for so long as the Defendant pays £5.00 per month to the Claimant in respect of the judgment debt.

 

The Schedule

 

The address of the land or charged property is XXXXXXXXXXXXX the title to which is registered at H.M Land Registry under Title No. XXXXXXXX.

 

 

 

 

You will need to check the terms and conditions Borris the above high light does not look favourable...check for anything with regards to Post Judgment interest.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

2. The interest of the defendant in the asset described in the schedule below stand charged with payment of the sum of £12,294.03 the amount now owing under a judgment or order given on 06 April 2009 together with any further interest becoming due and £218.00 the costs of the application.

 

3. The costs are to be added to the judgment debt.

 

4. The Claimant has agreed not to apply for an Order of sale for so long as the Defendant pays £5.00 per month to the Claimant in respect of the judgment debt.

 

The Schedule

 

The address of the land or charged property is XXXXXXXXXXXXX the title to which is registered at H.M Land Registry under Title No. XXXXXXXX.

 

 

 

 

 

You will need to check the terms and conditions Borris the above high light does not look favourable...check for anything with regards to Post Judgment interest.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Hi Andy, thanks for getting back to me. So I need to be looking for the original loan agreement terms and conditions at the time, which was 2004 and not in any court documentation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy, thanks for getting back to me. So I need to be looking for the original loan agreement terms and conditions at the time, which was 2004 and not in any court documentation?

 

Yes your T&Cs at signing and also the Particulars of Claim from the summons.( re post judgment interest)

 

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes your T&Cs at signing and also the Particulars of Claim from the summons.( re post judgment interest)

 

 

 

Andy

 

Yes that does sound scary: "...with any further interest becoming due...", but i read somewhere in this forum I think that this is standard text and is often abused by the creditors. If I cannot get hold of the original agreement/T&C (back in 2004) or the summons particulars, should I request them from Robinson Way & Co? I'm sure they won't have them or want to hand them over. They may also stall for time!I see poor folk get excited when they read variations of the text: statutory interest cannot may be added to debts under £5,000 or that are CCA regulated, only to find that it is possible if it states so in certain documents.

Edited by Borris the Bold
Link to post
Share on other sites

The summons would be vital to check the wording of the cliam..if there is no reference to statutory interest then it can not be added to the claim.

 

Its important though you under the difference here Borris...statuary interest 8% can be added to any claim over 5k Irrespective of the T&Cs or the agreement.Your dilemma would appear to be post judgment interest which whether referred to in the P.o.C or not can be added if its within the t&cs of said agreement...there is a difference.Hence the need to see sight of said agreement.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The summons would be vital to check the wording of the cliam..if there is no reference to statutory interest then it can not be added to the claim.

 

Its important though you under the difference here Borris...statuary interest 8% can be added to any claim over 5k Irrespective of the T&Cs or the agreement.Your dilemma would appear to be post judgment interest which whether referred to in the P.o.C or not can be added if its within the t&cs of said agreement...there is a difference.Hence the need to see sight of said agreement.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Thanks again Andy for the assistance. Would the creditor have these documents or should I start by contacting the court for the summons?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Court should have a copy of the summons assuming you have not retained yours.The T&Cs/Agreement would be with the Creditor (OC) again assuming you have not retained your original.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Court should have a copy of the summons assuming you have not retained yours.The T&Cs/Agreement would be with the Creditor (OC) again assuming you have not retained your original.

 

Okay thanks. The originals are nowhere to be found, which is foolish on my part. I better get on and ask the creditor, which will be fun to say the least. What should I do if the creditor has not go them or refuses to give copies to me? Are there any standard letters in CAG that I could use for this exercise to save a bit of time?Many thanks, Borris

Link to post
Share on other sites

Data Subject Access Request should flush out the T&Cs and statements/data but rarely the agreement..there is afee of £10 and they have 40 days to comply.Because there is a judgment now they may not respond to a section 77 request (CCA) fee £1 but worth a go to see they may respond.

Send both recorded delivery.Both templates are in the library.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Data Subject Access Request should flush out the T&Cs and statements/data but rarely the agreement..there is afee of £10 and they have 40 days to comply.Because there is a judgment now they may not respond to a section 77 request (CCA) fee £1 but worth a go to see they may respond.

Send both recorded delivery.Both templates are in the library.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Okay, I'll give it a go and see what turns up. Again, thanks a lot for your time. I'll report back with my findings!

Link to post
Share on other sites

A section 77-79 request should be sent - You need sight of the original t&cs. if they fail to provide said they are precluded from enforcing any interest charges.

 

Regards

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

A section 77-79 request should be sent - You need sight of the original t&cs. if they fail to provide said they are precluded from enforcing any interest charges.

 

Regards

 

Hello Paul,

 

Thanks for further assistance. I'm getting worried now because I'm holding everybody up in the chain. My conveyancer is just doing his job, which is to write to the solicitors of the creditors for final settlement figures in return for an RX4. We have had two figures back. One is under 5k and is fine, the second as you can read has had 8% slapped on it and I want to contest it, but with limited supporting documents and time. The third and final CO is a joke, Shoosmiths acting for Egg Banking plc passed on or sold the debt recently and did not know who had took it on (wasted two weeks). Today we were told it was Barclays, so my conveyancer has written to them. Shoosmiths gave me a settlement figure a year or so ago for a sale that unfortunately fell through. However, the figure matched that stated on the CO, which was fairplay by Shoosmiths, but now I bet Barclays or their solicitors will add 8%. Now these creditors know there's a property being sold, they'll just sit back and wait.

 

I need to ask these two creditors or their solicitors how are they claiming statutory interest, i.e. under the terms of an agreement, terms and conditions or a court summons, am I right in thinking this?

Edited by Borris the Bold
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...