Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I have a friend who has an ESA tribunal soon, help


Carvel
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4267 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes Osdset

 

I already have downloaded that I haven't picked though it all yet but there are particular instances which are similar to his situations. Please read below what I have saw in this.

 

 

Not sure if this recent decision may

 

be useful.

 

In CE/1757/2011 the claimant

 

suffered from mental health

 

problems and alcohol abuse.

 

Judge Levenson agrees in principle

 

with the Secretary of State that

 

needing the use of alcohol to visit

 

new places or engage in social

 

contact can be compared with the

 

use of self-hypnosis or relaxation

 

techniques or anti-anxiety

 

medication.

 

However, he does state that it is

 

matter of degree -

 

“A small glass of beer or lager

 

before going out might be one

 

thing, half a bottle of vodka would

 

be something else.”

 

In the latter kind of case, Judge

 

Levenson holds that Regulation

 

29(2)(b) would be brought into play

 

-

 

“…the claimant suffers from some

 

specific disease or bodily or mental

 

disablement and, by reasons of

 

such disease or disablement there

 

would be a substantial risk to the

 

mental or physical health of any

 

person if the claimant were found

 

not to have limited capability for

 

work.”

 

Judge Levenson outlines that the

 

First Tier Tribunal considered this in

 

the context of the claimant’s

 

attempts at self-harm. In respect of

 

alcohol it stated that “the alcohol

 

problem would not be a risk

 

because on the evidence of the

 

appellant he can function with the

 

amount he consumes for example

 

before he goes out”.

 

However, in upholding the

 

claimant’s appeal and remitting it

 

fore rehearing Judge Levenson says

 

that -

 

“It seems to me that if a claimant

 

has to drink significant amounts of

 

alcohol before going out, even to

 

the pub, and 3 ½ cans of alcohol

 

before facing the First Tier Tribunal

 

then it is incumbent on the First

 

Tier Tribunal to consider whether

 

and how much alcohol he might

 

need to drink before going to work,

 

on the way to work, and while at

 

work, in order to actually work.

 

Significant amounts on a daily basis

 

might well pose a substantial risk to

 

his own health and also (depending

 

on the nature of the work) to the

 

health of others. The First Tier

 

Tribunal was in error in not giving

 

proper consideration to this issue.

 

The new panel must do this.”

 

 

Would I be allowed to use past case hearings within his Submission Document?

 

How is this best applied? This case seems to me to be a powerful arguement for my friend. This is his first tribunal. Is he at risk or would he upset the Judge?

 

thank u

 

Yes you can quote upper tier decisions in the submission document - in fact it is advisable if you can find one that supports your case, as this one appears to. It doesn't upset the judge, as long as it is written respectfully. It is also wise if quoting precedent setting cases to send the submission in advance, so that the judge can obtain a copy of the decision to refer to.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Osdset, Nystagmite and Estellyn

 

You comments have given me confidence for me that I am going in the right direction. I think the use of the case by Judge Levenson is and could effective so thank you.

 

If any of you could help further with the descriptors 14c, 15 a, 15 c, 16 b and 16 c (Nystagmite helped with 6 b and 6 c) it would help me qualify his situation better.

 

thank u

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 is about getting around. What happens if your friend goes out? Think about their safety and safety of others. For example, do they wander off, etc.

 

14 is about coping with change. What happens if changes occur in daily routine? Can they manage with a minor change (such as last minute doctor appointment) ?

 

16 is about social engagement. Can your friend cope with others? Does your friends behaviour cause problems for others? Other people being friends and people they have never met before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nystagmite

 

Regards descriptor 15a, he just can't do that at all whilst sober due to social anxiety. Whilst he doesn't pose a danger to others, he would experience a high of anxiety. For example the last time he attempted to leave his front a few months ago, sober, just to go to the outside bin at the back of his block of flats, he experienced this anxiety, and turned back half way down the stairs and ran back into his flat as he felt a panic attack coming on.

 

Descriptor 14 this is a difficult one to qualify he don't really have any changes as such, all his days are all the same.

 

Descriptor 16a he is socially isloated really I only speak to him online (social website) and has no family. He does not engage anyone sober, he avoids it completely and only speaks to neighbours if he bumps into them, just saying hello etc, I brief conversation.

 

He has just had a set back today. The Work Program (voluntarily) alcohol worker cannot take him to tribunal or give any evidence as they are sub contracted by a4e and paid by the DWP. He doesn't want the tribunal to go through on paper evidence as he understands he will not win. The CAB told him they can't go with him. Any suggestions on advocacy?

 

thank u

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Estellyn thank you.

 

I have rang that number before today its rings then goes to a Skype answer machine unfortunately without reply. Maybe they don't exist anymore, I don't know.

 

Going back to the descriptors and as mentioned with his condition. He is essentially 'two people' with regards the WITH ALCOHOL and WITHOUT ALCOHOL. It is difficult to base an arguement with these factors for him. I understand you can only use one but which ones are best to apply?

 

thank u

Link to post
Share on other sites

deleted wrong thread

Edited by osdset

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Estellyn thank you.

 

I have rang that number before today its rings then goes to a Skype answer machine unfortunately without reply. Maybe they don't exist anymore, I don't know.

 

Going back t the descriptors and as mentioned with his condition. He is essentially 'two people' with regards the WITH ALCOHOL and WITHOUT ALCOHOL. It is difficult to base an arguement with these factors for him. I understand you can only use one but which ones are best to apply?

 

thank u

 

Can he do the descriptors without drinking - for instance going out and about? What about socialising, can he do that sober or does he need to drink, what effect does being drunk have on social encounters, can he be aggessive, confrontational difficult? What happens if there is a sudden change he needs to deal with, does this cause him to drink? What type of changes does he have the most difficulty dealing with. What are the long term effects of drinking on his health?

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Estellyn

 

1. He doesn't leave his front door, at all, for any purpose or for any reason if he is sober. His anxiety stops him from doing this, he needs to have drank at least 6 cans of super strength cider before he can leave his front door, and even then he has anxiety.

 

2. He is socially isolated. He cannot engage anyone in any form sober.

 

3. He avoids social contact (physical) i am unaware of any confrontations as such but I am aware he has had some instances. For example when he was in a hostel staff give his personal door key to another resident in error and he was mad.

 

4. As for a change in situation. An example was yesterday. He was advised that his rep couldn't attend the tribunal. I know that affected him deeply as he was drinking more than he would and was not particularly pleasant towards me yesterday in emails.

 

5. He knows that what he is doing is going to kill him long term yet he continues to drink.

 

thank u

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Estellyn

 

1. He doesn't leave his front door, at all, for any purpose or for any reason if he is sober. His anxiety stops him from doing this, he needs to have drank at least 6 cans of super strength cider before he can leave his front door, and even then he has anxiety.

 

2. He is socially isolated. He cannot engage anyone in any form sober.

 

3. He avoids social contact (physical) i am unaware of any confrontations as such but I am aware he has had some instances. For example when he was in a hostel staff give his personal door key to another resident in error and he was mad.

 

4. As for a change in situation. An example was yesterday. He was advised that his rep couldn't attend the tribunal. I know that affected him deeply as he was drinking more than he would and was not particularly pleasant towards me yesterday in emails.

 

5. He knows that what he is doing is going to kill him long term yet he continues to drink.

 

thank u

 

These are the thypes of things you need to include, and tie to best descriptor in each section to describe his issues.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

And if so can you please confirm what descriptors over and above i have mentioned. Perhaps an example of how to word it

 

thank u

 

Sorry if I have missed it in one of your previous post's, but when exactly is your friends appeal date?

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...