Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called. I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job. However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still haven't sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
    • The clock is ticking for savings providers. They now have just a few weeks left to get their act together and start offering loyal customers a good deal.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4206 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I cannot tell you how many enquiries i receive concerning Birmingham ( in particular) and the relationship with Capita and Equita. I am also aware of a large number of complaints that are being made to the Office of Fair Trading and Trading Standards.

 

Hi Tomtubby if you look at my thread there is a FOI request where BCC claim there have been a verrrry small number of complaints with about 5 upheld

My views are based on experience I would always urge you to do some further research and if in doubt seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you start paying that off? Is there still a couple of LO's? Did you email Stephen Hughes to get bailiff action held?

My views are based on experience I would always urge you to do some further research and if in doubt seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you start paying that off? Is there still a couple of LO's? Did you email Stephen Hughes to get bailiff action held?

 

hi, ive made a payment that i'll be making a payment friday, I've emailed Stephen Hughes, had an email replay.

 

 

I write to acknowledge your email of 28 September with regard to the above.

 

I am looking into this matter and will return to you as soon as I can.

 

Yours sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok email him back (click reply so he has the email chain) and ask him to clarify if bailiff action has been held off pending the results of his investigation? They should have been

My views are based on experience I would always urge you to do some further research and if in doubt seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good now we need to put together a reason why they should take it back, you need to let them know what you will be paying to BCC and how often and NEVER deviate from it.Let me know if you need me to help you word an email.

My views are based on experience I would always urge you to do some further research and if in doubt seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Sorry about the late reply,

I'd appreciate the help with the email please, i'm almost useless at getting the wording wrong,

At the moment after looking at my outgoings i can realistically afford £50 per month, hopefully i can find work soon and i can start paying more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With costs detailed below

 

Amount owed to the Council -:- £350.37

Bailiff costs -:- £227.50

 

Total Amount outstanding £577.87?

 

 

 

I understand you asked for a breakdown of fees and are awaiting a reply. They've probably charged an attending with a vehicle with the view to remove goods fee.

 

If on confirmation that this has been imposed, it might be an idea to incorporate something into a complaint giving these statistics:

 

 

Between 2007 to 2010, Birmingham City Council referred over 168,000 cases to bailiffs (in connection with Council Tax alone) to levy distress where only 80 of these had goods removed.

 

This represents less than 1 in every 2,000 cases (0.047 per cent).

 

 

You could put it to the council that these figures suggest their bailiff contractor systematically charges for vehicle attendances, when they have no genuine intention of removing goods.

Edited by outlawla
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Received a breakdown of cost + Fees this morning,

 

Liability order date 21/03/2012

 

Debt : £350.37

Statutory Visit Fees : £42.50

Visit/Levy Fee : £35.00

 

Total ; £427.87 -:- Total Received : Nil -:- Balance £427.87

 

Liability order Date 08/07/2009

 

Debt : £866.87

Statutory Visit Fees : £42.50

Visit Levy Fee : £44.00 :???:

Card Fee : £1.00:???:

 

Total £954.37 -:- Total Received : £561.08 -:- Balance £373.29

 

"I can confirm that a Walking Possession has not been signed. I can advise that the walking possession is a contractual agreement once goods have been levied. It is not essential and does not invalid a levy if not obtained."

 

From the Notice of Seizure from the 28/0912

 

Amount Owed -:- £350.37

Bailiff Costs inc vat -:- £227.50

Total -:- £577.87

Where the other £150 from?

 

The letter does not state what a levy has been applied to, is it best to write back and ask for details of the levy?

 

I could also do with some help writing to the council if possible. I'm useless at wording these sorts of email/letters,

Edited by cooper28.cliff
Link to post
Share on other sites

These figures are a nightmare...

 

 

Liability order Date 08/07/2009

 

Debt : £866.87

Statutory Visit Fees : £42.50

Visit Levy Fee : £44.00 :???:

Card Fee : £1.00:???:

 

Total £954.37 -:- Total Received : £561.08 -:- Balance £373.29 (£393.29)

 

 

 

 

 

 

My earlier post seems to have some relevance here.

 

 

From the Notice of Seizure from the 28/0912

 

Amount Owed -:- £350.37

Bailiff Costs inc vat -:- £227.50 (Approximately the difference between £866.87 and £640)

Total -:- £577.87

Where the other £150 from?

 

 

 

 

The letter does not state what a levy has been applied to, is it best to write back and ask for details of the levy?

 

 

I would write back telling them that you think the figures are wrong, and if they are right they make no sense.

 

Ask them to try again but to put a bit of effort in, and as you suggest, ask for details of the levies and to include dates of each visit which correspond to each of the fees imposed.

Edited by outlawla
Link to post
Share on other sites

They cannot apply a levy fee without detailing what goods they have levied, unless it a another Equita favourite "The Random Third Party Car" You need details of what they claim to have seized to ground the levy fee.

Edited by brassnecked

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They've completely messed up this breakdown of charges. However, strip away everything that appears to have been thrown in as a red herring.....

 

Equita appear to charge a £150 fee for an attendance (parking offences) page 22 of this....

 

I guess from your 28/09/12 Notice of Seizure they have carried the fees forward from the 21/03/2012 liability order breakdown, and included a £150 attendance fee without itemising it.

 

Amount Owed – £350.37

Possible dubious attendance fee – £150

Statutory visit fees – £42.50

Levy fee – £35

Total – £577.87

 

What is completely unfathomable is the breakdown for the 08/07/2009 Liability Order.

 

It might be the suspected £150 attendance fee has been mistakenly included in the charges (the Debt figure £866.87) you've been given as a breakdown.

 

You need to consider this point to follow the next step.

 

A levy fee of £44 is the correct amount for a debt of £640 (not £866.87 as in your breakdown).

 

There's a difference of £226.87 (£866.87 minus £640). So allowing for rounding up this is the same amount as the aggregate of these fees:

 

£150 – possible dubious attendance fee

£42.50 – Statutory visit fees

£35 – Levy fee

 

Total £227.50

 

I would guess the above fees have been mistakenly included in the 08/07/2009 Liability order breakdown.

 

Debt : £866.87 minus £227.50 (give or take £640)

Statutory Visit Fees : £42.50

Visit Levy Fee : £44.00

Card Fee : £1.00

 

Its really important to obtain the dates of each visit corresponding to the imposed fees and charges to get the best impact for a formal complaint. Include a breakdown for the account which has been settled also, this may have a bearing on the approach taken as there are likely to be dodgy fees added for that too.

Edited by outlawla
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

Going to be sending an email and letter to Equita today,

Here's what i have so far,

 

In reference to your letter dated 10th October 2012

 

Your Ref -:-

Liability Order Date -:-

 

Debt -:- £866.87

Statutory Visit Fees -:- £42.50

Levy Fees -:- £44.00 06/12/11 Please provide information on what the levy was made on

 

Total -:- £954.37

 

 

Received -:- £581.08

 

Balance -:- £373.29

 

Your Ref -:-

Liability Order Date -:-

 

Debt -:- £350.37

Statutory Visit Fees -:- £42.50

Levy Fees -:- £35.00 28/09/12 Please provide information on what the levy was made on

 

Total -:- £427.87

Received -:- £0.00

 

Balance -:- £427.87

 

As above, please provide information on the reasons for both levies.

Could you also explain your bailiff fees as per your “form 7 Notice of seizure and inventory of goods

 

Amount owing -:- £350.37

Bailiff Costs -:- £227.50

Total -:- £577.87

 

Is there anything important to add?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debt : £350.37

Statutory Visit Fees : £42.50 15.09.09 & 22.09.09

Visit/levylink3.gif Fee : £35.00

 

Total ; £427.87 -:- Total Received : Nil -:- Balance £427.87

 

Liability order Date 08/07/2009

 

Debt : £866.87

Statutory Visit Fees : £42.50 31.05.12 & 15.06.16

Visit Levy Fee : £44.00

Card Fee : £1.00

 

Total £954.37 -:- Total Received : £561.08 -:- Balance £373.29

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I've received a letter of Equita today regards fees attached to the account(s)

 

Dear Sirs

 

RE: Birmingham City Council - Council Tax

 

I write further to your communication dated 12th October 2012 with regard to the above.

 

Please be advised that the enforcement charge made up of a combination of costs which

include van hire bailiff travel and time at property, fuel insurance and equipment whilst the

bailiff executed his duty.

 

Please be advised your file is currently being managed by our enforcement office ** ****

*****, and he must be contacted immediately on *********** to negotiate payment of the

outstanding amount.

 

I have attached a copy of the Form 7 for you records

 

No form 7 was attached, i still haven't got details of the levies, or full details of the charges added to the account.

Any advice on the next move would be helpful,

 

Thanks :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I've received a letter of Equita today regards fees attached to the account(s)

 

"Please be advised that the enforcement charge made up of a combination of costs which

include van hire bailifflink3.gif travel and time at property, fuel insurance and equipment whilst the

bailifflink3.gif executed his duty. " Bull Excrement, :mad2: what is not specified in the regulations cannot be charged and an ENFORCEMENT FEE per se isn't in there

"

 

No form 7 was attached, i still haven't got details of the levies, or full details of the charges added to the account.

Any advice on the next move would be helpful,

 

Thanks :-)

Complaint to OFT as per oldbill's guidelines against Crapquita is in order at this juncture.

 

BN

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

An email i have sent to Karen Fowler

 

In regards to your letter dated 18th October

 

Dear Sirs

 

RE: Birmingham City Council - Council Tax

 

I write further to your communication dated 12th October 2012 with regard to the above.

 

Please be advised that the enforcement charge made up of a combination of costs which

include van hire
bailiff
link3.gif
travel and time at property, fuel insurance and equipment whilst the

bailiff
link3.gif
executed his duty.

 

Please be advised your file is currently being managed by our enforcement office ** ****

*****, and he must be contacted immediately on *********** to negotiate payment of the

outstanding amount.

 

I have attached a copy of the Form 7 for you records

Please refer to my previous email asking for details of each fee, This will now be my THIRD request for this information,

which you seem to be deliberately ignoring.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI all

 

After the third attempt to get the information on levies from equita, I'm still receiving the same response.

 

25 October 2012

RE: Birmingham City Council - Council Tax

 

I have been asked to write to clarify the fees that have been charged to your files following a query raised with our client

 

Please be advised that we currently hold three liability orders. The oldest file has been with us since

September 2009, with the other two since May 2012 and October 2012. I note that various visits have been made to your property by our external team in an effort to collect the debts, but to date we have been unsuccessful. In addition we have also issued several postal notices to you.

 

For your records I have once again detailed below the fees of which have been applied to each case, and the dates in relation

 

Bailiff ref :-

1st Statutory Visit Fee: £24.50

2nd Statutory Visit fee: £18.00

Levy Fees: £44.00

Card Processing Fee : £1.00

 

The statutory visit fees were incurred to the file in September 2009. Since that time numerous calls have been made to the property with goods identified on the 6th December 2011, incurring the levy fee as detailed. The card processing fee was incurred on the 5th October 2009. You have made payments to the case totalling £581.08 with the current amount outstanding totalling £373.29

 

Bailiff Ref :-

1st Statutory Visit Fee: £24.50

2nd Statutory Visit fee: £18.00

Levy Fees £35.00

 

The Statutory visit fees were incurred in May and June of this year respectively. Following to respond, action did escalate and our enforcement officer Mr ***** visited in September with the intention of seizing goods. Whilst this course of action was not carried through, goods were identified and levy fees, as detailed above were incurred. The outstanding balance is £427.87

 

Bailiff Ref :-

1st Statutory Visit Fee £24.40

 

This case was issued to us for collection October 2012, with the first statutory visit fee incurred to you on the 17th. No response was received to our office although since that time we have been advised a reduction in debt. Your balance outstanding to pay on the totals £99.03.

 

Our enforcement officer, Mr ***** is currently managing the cases and has been instructed to bring all cases to an amicable close, You therefore need to contact him on *********** to negotiate settlement.

I trust you find the above in orderm however should you require full details of the cases held, you will need to apply for a subject access report, which under the Data Protection Act cost the sum of £10.00. When this is received the information will be compiled against each cash and despatched to you within the time allowed of 40 days.

 

The Council tax for this year is upto date and i have been sending the payments that were agreed to, but this has still been sent to Equita,

Also if bailiff action is on hold, how come they tried to visit the property on the 17th (leaving no documentation, and not knocking)

 

Can i apply to the council to put the case(s) on hold again, or am i going to have to worry about these muppets knocking at my door again?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget that you are talking to Capita who own Equita when you talk to BCC, so they may have gone straight for a LO and passed this years over to Equita as a matter of routine, needs another Formal Complaint and involvement of MP imho

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Either this guy has no idea what he's doing, or he's deliberately trying to fox you.

 

I'll add comments in blue:

 

In a previous post, it stated this liability order was £866.87

 

bailiff ref :-

1st Statutory Visit Fee: £24.50

2nd Statutory Visit fee: £18.00

Levy Fees: £44.00 – this corresponds to a debt of £640

Card Processing Fee : £1.00

 

First £100 - £24.50

Next £400 @4% = £16

Next £140 @2.5% = £3.50

 

24.50 + 16 + 3.5 = £44

 

The statutory visit fees were incurred to the file in September 2009. Since that time numerous calls have been made to the property with goods identified on the 6th December 2011, incurring the levy fee as detailed. The card processing fee was incurred on the 5th October 2009. You have made payments to the case totalling £581.08 with the current amount outstanding totalling £373.29

 

Edited by outlawla
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...