Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CAB bedroom tax charge calculating tool released by the CAB.


MARTIN3030
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4236 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I just found these Q&As on the local housing association website:

 

Sorry, I can't give the link, the forums won't let me with me being a newbie.

 

***

 

We look at a few examples of how the changes could affect different households.

 

I have lived in the same two bedroom house for 30 years. I am 75 and don’t think that I could cope with moving house. What will happen to me?

 

Kenneth, York

 

The Advisor says: Kenneth, you don’t have any reason to worry. The under occupation penalty only affects people of working age, so anyone between the ages of 16 and 61, meaning the changes will not affect you.

***

 

We live in a three bedroom house. My son is six and my daughter will be ten next June, do the under-occupation changes mean that we will have to move?

 

Janek, Doncaster

 

The Advisor says: Although the under-occupation rules mean that you qualify for a two bedroom house, within three months of the changes to the rules (which will happen in April 2013), you would qualify for a three bedroom house.

 

I would advise that you start making some savings now if you can, so that for those three months you can afford to pay the difference in your housing benefit.

 

***

Our children have left home, so we know that our housing benefit will be reduced because of under-occupation. Do you have any advice about what we should do?

 

Jean, Skipton

 

The Advisor says: You may want to consider moving into a smaller home. You can do this through a mutual exchange or registering on a Choice Based Lettings system and bidding for smaller properties.

 

Alternatively, if you’d like to stay in your home, you could consider taking in a lodger. Get in touch with your Neighbourhood Officer to find out more about these options.

***

 

I live on my own for most of the week but my children come to visit at the weekend. I have two bedrooms that they stay in when they visit, will my benefit be reduced?

 

Donald, Malton

 

The Advisor says: Your benefit will be reduced by 25% because your children are not classed as living with you. Perhaps you can enquire about taking some more hours on at work to boost your income.

 

We understand that this may not be easy at the moment but we are here to help and can offer and suggest a number of training and work experience opportunities. And, make sure that you are claiming all the benefits that you are entitled to. If you don’t already do it, start budgeting carefully, there may be small savings that you can make each week that will help towards the shortfall such as changing your energy provider.

 

For budgeting and benefits advice, why not make an appointment with your Money and Benefits Advisor?

 

***

My wife sleeps in the spare room because she has a respiratory disease. Will our benefits be reduced?

 

Frank, Wakefield

 

The Advisor says: Your benefits will be reduced because the under occupancy rules say that an adult couple are entitled to one room. The government has put more money into housing payments for situations like yours so make sure you are claiming all the benefits you are entitled to.

***

 

I’m worried about the benefit changes. I’m a single mum on housing benefit and have two sons over 18. Will I still be able to afford to live in my house?

 

Maria, York

 

The Advisor says: Because your sons are over 18, they may be classed as non-dependants. A non-dependant is someone who lives with you who is over 18. I expect that you already have money deducted from your housing benefit for this, but those deductions will increase in April 2013.

 

The amount deducted will depend on whether your sons work (and for how long each week) and whether they are eligible for other benefits. If either of your sons is a full time student, has been in hospital for a long period of time, is in prison or you are claiming middle or high rate Disability Living Allowance, no deduction to your housing benefit will be made.

 

If none of the above apply, then perhaps you could ask your sons to pay half each towards the shortfall?

 

Your sons can also claim housing benefit in their own right, so make sure that you’re all claiming everything you are entitled to.

***

 

I’m on Disability Living Allowance (DLA) and have heard that there are going to be changes. Can you tell me what those changes are?

 

Betty, Harrogate

 

The Advisor says: DLA will have a new name, Personal Independence Payment, or PIP, from April 2013. This is a tax free benefit for children and adults with disabilities to help cope with the extra cost of living for people with a disability.

 

All working age claimants of DLA will be reassessed for PIP, which does mean that some working age claimants may have their benefits reduced.

 

If this does happen, contact your Benefits & Money Advisor for advice and support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres a thought

"Indirect sexual discrimination applies to policies and practices which, in reality, disadvantage one gender considerably more than another although on the face of it, they seem to apply to both sexes equally. For example, a requirement to work full time might be more of a bar for women than men." Direct Gov.

I have two children my daughter lives with me 24/7 but my son is 50/50 min often longer but:

"when there is shared child care even if it is 50/50 the Child Benefit goes to the mother" Child Benefit office.

Most fathers therefore are disadvantaged because more males work full time and only have children for 2/3 days or even if 50/50 child benefit goes to the mother. Child benefit is the key as to the residence of a child and therefore under occupation plus the key to other benefits.

I am either going to have to fight over getting child benefit or will be 14% down on Housing Benefit.

Isn't this policy state discrimination?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your sons can also claim housing benefit in their own right, so make sure that you’re all claiming everything you are entitled to.

 

This is incorrect as the sons would not be eligible for HB

 

Child benefit is the key as to the residence of a child and therefore under occupation plus the key to other benefits.

 

For HB purposes, the issue is which household the child spends most time in.

 

So if child spends 4 or more days per week in one household and 3 or less in other, the child is included in first household. (irrespective of who receives child benefit)

 

Receipt of Child Benefit would only be relevant if a child spent equal amounts of time in 2 or more households

Edited by id6052

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Housing benefit forms clearly state re number of children that you can only claim for those that you are in receipt of child benefit for, raised the issue with CAB and the Housing Association Benefits Officer and told the same. In my case the split is over last 75 days 58 nights with me. Do you have any regs that I can quote?

 

Part 2 – The people living with you - children

Please give details of all children for whom you receive child benefit. If you have more children please

supply these details on page 14. Current evidence of child benefit will need to be supplied.

Edited by hessey50
Link to post
Share on other sites

Regulation 20 of Housing Benefit Regulations 2006

 

20.—(1) Subject to the following provisions of this regulation a person shall be treated as responsible for a child or young person who is normally living with him and this includes a child or young person to whom paragraph (3) of regulation 19 applies.

(2) Where a child or young person spends equal amounts of time in different households, or where there is a question as to which household he is living in, the child or young person shall be treated for the purposes of paragraph (1) as normally living with—

(a)the person who is receiving child benefit in respect of him; or

(b)if there is no such person—

(i)where only one claim for child benefit has been made in respect of him, the person who made that claim, or

(ii)in any other case the person who has the primary responsibility for him.

(3) For the purposes of these Regulations a child or young person shall be the responsibility of only one person in any benefit week and any person other than the one treated as responsible for the child or young person under this regulation shall be treated as not so responsible.

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres a thought

"Indirect sexual discrimination applies to policies and practices which, in reality, disadvantage one gender considerably more than another although on the face of it, they seem to apply to both sexes equally. For example, a requirement to work full time might be more of a bar for women than men." Direct Gov.

I have two children my daughter lives with me 24/7 but my son is 50/50 min often longer but:

"when there is shared child care even if it is 50/50 the Child Benefit goes to the mother" Child Benefit office.

Most fathers therefore are disadvantaged because more males work full time and only have children for 2/3 days or even if 50/50 child benefit goes to the mother. Child benefit is the key as to the residence of a child and therefore under occupation plus the key to other benefits.

I am either going to have to fight over getting child benefit or will be 14% down on Housing Benefit.

Isn't this policy state discrimination?

 

Unfortunately, you'll probably not have a leg to stand on where gender/sexual discrimination is concerned.

 

A friend of mine has a friend's child staying over with her weeknights, because youngster's lone parent dad works away Monday-Friday. Dad gets the child benefit, my friend doesn't, so in theory, my friend will probably have her housing benefit cut despite this arrangement. She gets no money for the child's keep from lone parent dad because he was happy to leave the 13 year old home-alone all week while he went to work 180 miles away, Monday to Friday. Short of social services and court intervening, it would appear she is stuck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Each article I read including the local council's refer only to Council Housing and Housing Association properties is this correct and it doe's not apply to Private Rental?

 

There are 2 of us in a private rented property with 2 bedrooms,we need space to look after our 2 grandchildren various weekends in the year,will this stop the council reducing our Housing Benefit?

 

Thought also of re classifying our house as a 1 bedroom with office,would this work?

 

Regards FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

no this will not stop them....the grandchildrens main home will be classed as their residence, and if you fall into the age range this will affect your entitlement regardless of whether the children stay at the weekend or not....i believe if you are over retirement age then the new rules will not affect any entitlement...whether you can reclassify or not i am not too sure and maybe someone else may know

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks debt4get,,,,,,,We are retired so perhaps it will not hit us. as usual it is an ill thought out change in the system.The theory of releasing Council/Housing Association property where a single person is living in a 3 bed house for example is a good idea,so the obvious course of action is to insert a clause in the contracts,problem solved.

 

That seems to easy?

 

FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone know if the law has changed in regards to a disabled child having their own room?

 

http://www.insidehousing.co.uk/care/peer-calls-for-disabled-exemption-to-bedroom-tax/6524242.article?MsgId=63599

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks debt4get,,,,,,,We are retired so perhaps it will not hit us. as usual it is an ill thought out change in the system.The theory of releasing Council/Housing Association property where a single person is living in a 3 bed house for example is a good idea,so the obvious course of action is to insert a clause in the contracts,problem solved.

 

That seems to easy?

 

FS

like all govt policies lately, they seem ill thought out, and pandering to the right wing element of this country who seem to believe that we are all nothing but scrounging 'sc#m' who do nothing but take take take from society....the end result of these policies will be a rise in homelessness and people being pushed to the brink whilst trying to maintain a roof over their heads for themselves and family...hope everything works out for you...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Each article I read including the local council's refer only to Council Housing and Housing Association properties is this correct and it doe's not apply to Private Rental?

 

There are 2 of us in a private rented property with 2 bedrooms,we need space to look after our 2 grandchildren various weekends in the year,will this stop the council reducing our Housing Benefit?

 

Thought also of re classifying our house as a 1 bedroom with office,would this work?

 

Regards FS

 

Most private lets are already restricted by the size criteria (based upon Rent Officer/LHA rates).

 

Next year's changes are to bring social housing into line with private lets.

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...