Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4257 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon all,

 

I'm currently in search for some support regarding an un-paid penatly fare which has now been passed from the magistrates courts to Marston Baliffs.

 

last June i made the mistake to travel without a valid ticket on a south west train. I was caught through my stupidity and had to provide address details etc as i was unable to pay the full amount at the time. Now instead of addressing the issue immediately i left the fine unpaid and was contacted by my parents in December reference to one or two notifications they had recieved through the post in reference to the outstanding amount. I did continue to ignore the reminders but did speak to the (at the time) current debt recovery team to request direct debit mandate details be sent through and also got the address changed to my previous city address in early Jan. I failed to return this information. I split with my partner at the end of Jan, left my job and moved back to the town i grew up in to a friends. I recieved a notification to this address in August reference to the outstanding amount from Marstons who basically advised that they had used certain techniques in obtaining my current address via tracings and investigations.

 

After numerous calls yesterday afternoon as i know these things won't go away and along with maturatiy and just simply wanting to resolve this deep depressing issue i was told that it had moved via the following South West Trains > IRCAS > Salisbury Magistrates > Paul Enforcement > Marstons. I was advised that i would have recieved a court summons which upon speaking to the magistrates yesterday would have gone to my parents address. I'm surprised at this as they usually open most mail that gets delivered and i've never been aware of such a letter.

 

When i spoke to Marstons they simply told me if i do not pay the total of 663.90 in full then there is no alternative other than to await a visit from an enforcement officer. This clearly isn't what i want and despite suggesting due to other financial obligations (i've recently moved into my own place) that i pay this in monthly sums ie £100.00pm i was told this wasn't a possibility as the court have asked for the full amount.

 

After hearing this i was desperate not to allow the baliff's to perform a visit as at present they will be going to a friends address to which i no longer live. Equally (although im sure they can work it out again) i dont want to provide them with my new address. I then contacted the magistrate's court again to ask if they could potentially recall the debt and let me set-up payment via them. They said this could potentially be an option but i would need to either write into the courts asking for the case to be re-opened or file for statutory declaration.

 

I guess what i'm after here is some support or suggestions through no fault but my own on what would be the best way to proceed. I do have 1 or 2 payday loans who are currently being dealt with via a debt management team but they wont touch this kind of debt as it needs to be paid immediately.

 

I accept the debt is mine, i accept i was ignorant and i accept this needs to be sorted but what i can't accept or physically do is pay the full total off. I am unable to approach family or friends in reference to financial support to clear this either nor would i want them to share this experience with me. I got myself into this mess and i need to sort it.

 

All help and/or suggestions is greatly appreciated.

 

If i need to explain any more to assist please let me know. I'm afraid my knowledge on notifications, letters etc is very limited due to changes of address and mobile number.

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Jon

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know the answer but I think the court gave you two options? Get the case re-opened or file a statutory declaration.

 

Let me say upfront - I am no expert in this area. But as I understand, the statutory declaration process requires you complete some forms and send them to a court - not sure which one. You can generally contest bailiff charges if you were not in receipt of prior documentation. The purpose is to get the bailiff fees revoked.

 

Unless someone here can give you some better guidance, you might have to research this elsewhere on the internet - and have alook around the main forum here to see if there are other pages where you might get some expertise - eg, look for a section about court debts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of the the two addresses I would have the bailiffs attend I know which I would prefer.

 

If you truly want to sort this out then man up and send the bailiffs your new address.

 

Allowing the possibility that they will turn up at a friends house - who has helped you out by putting you up in your hour of need - is simply ......... (I am struggling for the words here so I suggest you fill in the blanks with some of your own).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of the the two addresses I would have the bailiffs attend I know which I would prefer.

 

If you truly want to sort this out then man up and send the bailiffs your new address.

 

Allowing the possibility that they will turn up at a friends house - who has helped you out by putting you up in your hour of need - is simply ......... (I am struggling for the words here so I suggest you fill in the blanks with some of your own).

 

He's already said he's desperate for the bailiffs not to visit his friends. He's looking for a way out if this - try and help him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you were not living at the address the fine was issued to then the Court (for once) have it bang to rights....you can attend the issuing court and make a stat dec to that effect....if they accept it the fine will be reissued and bailiffs called off or, you will need to write to the Court and explain the same again and ask they reopen the case to allow you to either pay the fine in full or agree a payment plan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks Jamberson and Wonkey Donkey appreciate you getting back to me. I spoke to Marstons on at 18th, indicated to them i could make the full payment at the end of October, additionally i updated them with my new address. I'm not sure if that was a stupid idea or not but although Bandit127 wasn't particulary helpful the last thing i want is it impacting my previous friends property. I had a conversation with my current flatmate on Wednesday evening and he very kindly said he will able to lend me the money under a personal agreement on Friday the 28th of Sept. I contacted Marstons on the 19th to indicate this. On both occasions they said all they can do is update the account but can't gaurentee it will prevent a visit.

 

If i'm brutally honest my only concern at this stage is they will intentionally visit my property now prior to my payment to obtain there attendance fee (£200). Where do i stand with this? Presumably know where as they will just say 'it was going to happen anyway' I guess what im trying to prevent is them trying to get extra cash.

 

Anyway, any suggestions are welcome.

 

I guess the next time i re-post will be confirmation of final payment and the end result. Wish me a non-visited good luck :)

 

Jon

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All,

 

Just to let you know i paid this fine in full on the 28th (yesterday). I'm not sure if me keeping them up to date (as i hadn't since originally getting the fine in June 2011) prevented a visit but between there letter on the 15th of August and now they did not visit or add any additional charges on.

 

I think the moral of the story here is if you have been fined for a 'priority debt' (council tax, electricity, water, train/car, DVLA) these ones are serious and do need your full attention. I can't tell you how stressed i was in regards to a visit etc. Also in addition to what I've said I really do wish i would have just paid the £40 fine initially and not the £663.90 i paid yesterday. :jaw:

 

Thanks for all contributions, it does really look like if it's a genuine fine you really are on your own to sort it! As i was told.. You need to man up

 

Jon

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry but I had not seen this query sooner. The CORRECT position is that you should have called the court and ask them to allow you to file a Statutory Declaration on the basis that you had not received the summons. This process is so very simple and the effect of the Stat Dec would have been to revoke the Distress Warrant. A bailiff fees would also have been cancelled.

 

In fact, from reading your post again the court appear to have suggested this option to you !!!

 

Even though you have paid, you are still able to file the application and the warrant will still be revoked and you should then be entitled to a refund of the court fine AND bailiff fees of £300.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not file the Stat Dec, and take the bailiffs beer tokens from him? You can then pay the original fine amount .

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I seem to remember that I have an email from the Ministry of Justice confirming that if a stat dec is filed that a refund of the fine and bailiff fees will be given.

 

It must be remembered that a Statutory Declaration is a legal document that is available to "remedy a default" in "rewinding" the case to an earlier stage so that a person is able to (for instance) pay a parking ticket or fine at an earlier stage and thereby having the benefit of a discounted rate. In the case of a criminal offence the acceptance of a stat dec allows for the person to file a defence etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...