Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PaydayUK Help!! ASAP


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4282 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello to squeeze in the long story, I have posted on several places but thought it'd be best to start a new thread, I have 2 payday loans, one is with Payday Uk and the other Wonga, I have recently agreed a payment plan with wonga quite successfully, however I emailed paydayuk a few weeks ago to arrange a payment plan long before the long was due, after several frustrated emails they said it has to fail payment before a payment plan is considered, that day has come and the £281 is due, I offered a plan by email of £46 however they pretended as if I never even mentioned it, I'm reluctant to call but want to get it sorted fairly immediately! And was wondering if anyone has advice or experiences to help, plus would anyone know how much they are likely to offer me based on the loan amount?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont call them. They play ignorant so you feel you have no choice but to do so.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello so i've finally had an email from them, asking me to send my income and expenditure again as if i'd never spoke to them, having sent it off proposing my off they sent a counter offer of 56 over 5 months which i could afford however they said i cant start it from october as the first payment would be needed immediately and that they couldnt hold the account without payment, now i know im right inasking that it start in october as it would take me a few weeks to get my finances in order and i did mention it to them 3 weeks ago in the first place is there anyway i can say this professionally and sternly to them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats just the usual crap they send out. Resend your offer and tell them that it is non negotiable. An i&e form is to prove your offer of repayment is genuine. Not for them to decide one for you.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent them an email with a paragraph copied from another user on here which made them accept my payment plan, however i transfered money into the account to pay them the exact amount and the took 25 pound straight out im guessing that was there collections payment trying to still take the smallest amount out, and then i had to transfer more in so the have now taken a payment today of 71.89 is there any point in me chasing this with them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

it was definately them as i have had a look on my statement, basically the emailed me saying saying they could accept my offer, and a payment was needed immediately to place the account on hold and could i confirmed the last 4 digits of my card number and expiry, so i transfered the moneyu into the account and emailed them to tell them, then within 15 25 pound was taken and they emailed me saying my payment couldnt be processed so i then emailed and said that its because they had already taken 25 so they are only authorised to take 21.89 and they took the full 46.89 so they have had 71.89 they have stop there collections since but should i complain or is it not going to get me anywhere, they have accepted my payment plan though?

Link to post
Share on other sites

These lenders seem to do what they like when money is owed to them. I would suggest cancelling your card and getting wages paid in to another bank account.

 

Never give them your new card details, request their banking information and setup a standing order or pay the funds into their account manually on the due dates.

 

1) Cancel your card.

2) Never ring them, always use email or letters to communicate.

3) Never give them your new card details.

4) Setup a standing order with the agreed repayments.

 

Regarding the £25 they took after agreeing to your repayment plan, i would suggest contacting your bank to let them know they never had your consent to take the monies and you would like a refund because that is fraud (it's never this easy but people have been lucky to get it back).

 

Then make a complaint to the oft.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...