Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HMRC sending an officer


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4275 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am not sure whether this is right part of the forum in which to post.

I am so stressed at the moment.

 

I started making money from my hobby a few years ago. I have an unpaid tax bill of £1996 which last year I set up an agreement to pay back. Unfortunately after some problems with cashflow and a family bereavement I didn't keep up with it (I realise this was my fault)

 

I received a letter this morning stating that they are cancelling the arrangement. I called to try and reinstate the arrangement and was told that unless I can pay them £1800 TODAY they will continue their action and send officers round to seize my goods or declare me bankrupt within the week.

 

The only thing I own is my car which is (just about) worth 2k but I need my car obviously with 2 small children. Everything else was purchased by my husband. I am absolutely terrified. Please help me

Link to post
Share on other sites

are they not saying they MAY make you bankrupt i doubt it at this point they would need to go to court for that to happen

 

even for tax arrears bailiffs have no right of entry keep property secure and don't let them in they can not force entry

 

with regards to car that would be seen a s a easy target for bailiffs to bump up his fees so keep it hidden away

 

sounds like tax office being unreasonable i am sure if you could afford to pay £1800 today you would have no outstanding tax but the read from a script

 

it may pay to put it in writing to tax office of your offer to repay enclosing payment you will get nowhere on phone and no proof

 

welcome to GAG:-D

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask how the bill for £1996 was arrived at?

 

Presumably HMRC discovered what you were doing....then what? Did you get an accountant to do some proper accounts or did the taxman just say heres the bill?

 

I ask because Im an accountant and so many times I see cases like this where HMRC conveniently omit to tell the taxpayer what expenses they are entitled to claim....something that any accountant would spot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both so much for replying.

 

The figure was an outstanding SA tax plus a late return penalty from 2009 I didn't actually realise I had. I did use an accountant and he claimed a lot of expenses etc so I don't refute that I do owe it. I just don't have money at the moment. I did explain that my oldest son is off to secondary school in september and although I don't want him to be in the house alone for a couple of hours after school it will be the earliest I can go out to work to pay them back. She said that wasn't good enough and couldn't I borrow the money.. nearly 2k?! erm no not really!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you definitely dealing with HMRC or with one of their band of cockroaches (sorry approved debt collecting agencies).

 

A lot of debt collection has been farmed out to the same firms that collect credit card debts etc, and from my experience they are economical with the truth and have no ethics whatsoever.

 

Telling you to borrow the money, and that they can bankrupt you within a week doesnt sound like an HMRC office - no one likes taxmen but they do tend to follow the rules.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like an idiot, when the person at hmrc I spoke with asked what my car reg was I gave it to her. I can't really hide the car :( No garage etc

 

that does not meany they have a levy on it if there is no where to hide it you can always transfer ownership of it to a parent/family member

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

that does not meany they have a levy on it if there is no where to hide it you can always transfer ownership of it to a parent/family member

Can I do this? Would it work if I transferred the ownership to my husband? (he did actually buy it, but its in my name)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I do this? Would it work if I transferred the ownership to my husband? (he did actually buy it, but its in my name)

 

if the tax debt is yours then no reason why not

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I pointed out to the woman on the phone that it was MY debt she said that it would be viewed as a joint debt because we have a joint mortgage?! I thought it was a bit unfair but we have only been married for 4 weeks (together 10 years mind you) and I haven't really looked into how things differ once you get married.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HMRC expect money to be kept aside to pay tax bills.

 

However the visitor will not be a bailiff and has no power of entry under any circumstances. You will be expected to agree a repayment plan to deal with the matter quickly, but you don't have to let them in to do this.

 

If your repayment plan is not accepted then they could obtain a CCJ, which seems more likely for this amount. They could serve a Statutory Demand prior to petitioning for bankruptcy, but that seems a bit extreme given the fees they'd have to pay with no guarantee of recouping them.

 

If they get a CCJ then the court decides how quickly you must repay, although a record is kept for six years. Obviously you will need to ensure this year's tax bill is also funded, to avoid trouble next year.

 

Bailiffs acting for HMRC do have the power to force entry to your home once a CCJ and a Warrant of Execution have been granted, but you're a long way off that horror and it really is a last resort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your reply Marmaris. You too, once again I hate bailiffs. I really do appreciate the advice x

 

I think I will sit and work out exactly what I have coming in and going out and then I will pen a letter as you suggested and send it to them recorded. When they discuss a repayment plan, have you any idea of the timescales they would expect the debt to be repayed over? I want to get rid of the debt asap but obviously cannot promise more than I can afford, which is not a lot at the moment!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember that unpaid taxes are priority debts, so this comes before any other debts but not before genuine essentials like rent/mortgage interest, food and the like. They'll probably not entertain anything stretching beyond the end of the tax year, and they won't fail to remind you of your duties regarding taxes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From experience :

 

Do not call them. Do not speak to them or let them in. Change your vehicle ownership details asap. Setup an online banking payment and pay them little and often, that way each time they send you a statement you can write back saying this is not right, I dont owe that much, where did you get that figure ! :-)

 

HMRC will pass it to their debt collection firm, name escapes me, and you write back to them saying who are you, i dont owe that figure to HMRC, prove it! They write back saying its on hold whilst you contact HMRC, you ignore letter and carry on paying little and often - HMRC happy to see payments and move on to someone else.

 

Do not worry and do not lose any sleep over it, they are not worth it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

To protect against Seizures, just get in the habit of parking your car a couple of streets away, and do a statutory declaration putting all goods in the house, except stuff that is clearly for your "work/hobby" in your hubby's name.

 

The Taxman has extraordinary powers, so its best to get protected in advance - think of it as debt contraception!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...