Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Can you please also have a look at points 20-27? The sent me a remediation pack with not only statements but sums of arrears they haven't sent for 2 years, so I didn't know I was in arrears. Then they defaulted me after they apologised for their cca breach. I truly didn't understand what that pack was about. I thought it was some kind of a mistake they will make right later as SLC used to do this. Genuinely I thought that but I don't know if that's an OK defence?  
    • Thank you for posting the full sar.  So they definitely did place the PCN on your vehicle only to remove it 10 minutes later apparently because of a possible problem with the driver which seems highly unlikely [the reason for the PCN removal ]. Did the driver even see the warden at all while they were photographing the car . They did take several pictures spread over 12 minutes or so using a flash so the driver would have seen the car being photographed had they been there.   Very strange. You said that you had an onboard camera -are you able to go back and see what happened? Was the warden wearing UKPC clothing? In any event that PCN has not complied with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  That should be a Notice to Driver and the follow up PCN should not be sent until 28 days AFTER the day the first PCN  was given were it a postal PCN. Instead the knuckleheads have issued the follow up PCN on the 28th day of their dodgy first PCN and so totally blowing all their machinations to get over the fact that  the windscreen ticket wasn't a windscreen ticket. In neither case, even if they had been sent properly, they were non compliant. neither of them showed the period of parking which is specified in the Act. Both just show a time of issue at 20.02 but no end period. Their  "mistake" in not giving 29 days  before issuing their keeper Liability notice, makes the PCN more than just non compliant. It means that the PCN was unlawful and probably deliberate as had UKPC waited until the correct time to send that Notice, it would have delayed it until the Monday. And as they probably knew that had not received the original windscreen PCN perhaps they thought it better to rewrite the Law. Part of that is conjecture but the basic fact is correct-the Notice was unlawful. And for that there should be repercussions. My first thought was the ICO but  as it isn't really a breach of data protection it goes higher than that. Perhaps the Site Team would know. I did look at the Legal Ombudsman but they are for complaints against lawyers.  I cannot imagine a decent lawyer even countenancing such a thing though were are dealing with third rate ones when involved with some parking companies.   For reference PoFA Schedule 4 S8 and S9 [2][f] f)warn the keeper that if, at the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to keeper is given— Their PCN dated 12/04/24 states "as 28 days have now elapsed since the Notice to Keeper was given, Parking Control management [UK] Ltd. [the creditor] are now able ...........to recover the unpaid parking charge from......... the registered keeper. The original PCN was marked by them as being deemed delivered 15/03/2024 so 28 days +1 =13/04/24. Their letter was sent one day early which means they altered or ignored the law . I have never seen that "error" on any other Notice from any of the parking companies. As the Member did not receive the original PCN which was originally a Windscreen ticket but they then changed it to a postal one for some fanciful reason the whole scenario reeks of skullduggery. I am going to ask again from Hamz why their warden might have felt scared about a confrontation with the driver but even if there was a chance the PCN was placed on the windscreen and not removed for around a minute but pictures had already been taken so why remove it? And then why produce a brand new keeper Liability Notice the like of which I have not seen before.  
    • You have not been allowed the statuary 7 days to prepare or submit your statement as you only only received the notice of hearing on Saturday   Example   Erudio Student Loans Limited V XXXX Claim No: XXXXX Witness Statement in response to the claimants application It is respectfully requested that the court allow this statement as evidence in response as I was only informed of the hearing date on Saturday 11th May 2024 and therefore denied 7 days to respond. I, xxxxxxx being the Defendant in this case will state as follows; I make this Witness Statement to oppose the claimant application dated 25/04/23 to lift the stay and Strike Out Defence/Summary Judgment pursuant to CPR 24.5 (1) a & b in view of my defence submitted to the claim dated 06/07/22. The Claimant confirms that this claim issued through Northampton County Court Business Centre on 15/03/22 and remained stayed since. I will respond to the same numbered paragraphs as the claimant’s statement as follows: 1. The claimants witness statement opening paragraph confirms that it mostly relies on hearsay evidence as confirmed by the draft’s person in the opening paragraph. It is my understanding that they must serve notice to any hearsay evidence pursuant to CPR 33.2(1)(B) (notice of intention to rely on hearsay evidence) and Section 2 (1) (A) of the Civil Evidence Act and also be in attendance at hearing to give evidence in support of the claimant’s witness statement. 2. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.  Background Insert your pars here   Defendants Response to claimants claim/ Application Insert your points here  Conclusion Insert your points here but finish with the following. 16.  In view of the information set out above I respectfully submit to the court that the claimant’s application be denied. The claim remains stayed until such time the claimant can comply with section 77 of the CCA1974 or in the absence of that compliance strike out the claimant claim and dismiss the claim in its entirety. The claimant has failed to evidence and justify its application to dispose of this claim without a trial where a claim or issue or a defence to a claim or issue has no real prospect of success and there is no other compelling reason for a trial. (CPR 24.2)     Statement of truth I, XXXXXXX defendant, believe the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of Court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.   Signed:  Print Name: Dated:
    • Thank you @BankFodder. Apologies for not being clear. Here are some further details that might help clarify: The item in question is a replica of a movie prop. I build highly accurate movie props as a hobby and these items are machined by enthusiasts in very small runs (50-100) and once they're gone, they're gone. I missed out on one of these runs but a friend from the community had purchased two and decided he only needed one so offered to sell me his other one. I bought the replica prop from him and asked him to send it to my Stackry address in USA. He is based in USA and I am based in the UK. Had he shipped it directly to me in the UK, due to the size and weight, the shipping would have been expensive. Stackry is a service in the USA that has access to cheaper couriers. I have used it many times before without any issues. I simply sign in to my account when they notify me the package is received, fill out the customs form, and select my home address in the UK, select one of the couriers after receiveing a quote based on size and weight and pay the shipping fee. On this occasion I chose GlobalDirect. I had no idea the item would be handed over to Evri on arrival to the UK. The initial tracking was with DHL e-commerce. The second tracking number on arrival to the UK was with Evri. It was Evri who lost the parcel through negligence. Below is a complete timeline of events. The item made its journey from my friend in the USA to Stackry, USA without any problems. I was notified when the package was received. The item also made its journey via DHL/Global Mail Direct from the USA to the UK without any issues. The problem happened in the UK, with Evri.   I did not take out insurance. The price of the item was £185.01 Shipping from Stackry, USA to my home address in the UK with Global Mail Direct was £17.87. Total £202.88.  The letter of claim is below. The 14 days is not up yet but I have every intention on following through. I have no priror experience with this which is why I came here for advice, but I have found the online claim form on Gov.UK and intend to start there.   TIMELINE:   Item purchased from individual in USA on 26/3/24. Payment made by PayPal. Item shipped to Stackry, USA on the same day. Item advised received by Stackry on 29/3/24. Redirected by myself to my UK home address on the same day. Payment made and selected Global Mail Direct as the courier of choice. Tracking number generated for DHL e-commerce 02/04/24: arrived to the UK and cleared customs 03/04/24: processed at local distribution centre, forwarded to delivery agent (Evri) - new tracking number generated 06/04/24: marked”out for delivery” at 08:52. No delivery attempt made all day. At 21:21 marked “on its way back to sender”.  09/04/24: no further updates since “there’s an issue with your parcel. Contact the sender”. Customer support contact via email almost on a daily basis from 08/04/24 to 23/04/24 to no avail. Letter before claim sent on 03/05/24.   03/05/2024   Letter before small claims court claim   EVRi Parcelnet Limited Capitol House 1 Capitol Close Morley Leeds LS27 0WH   Dear Sirs   Reference: Parcel with the tracking number H01PQD0027409372 / H01PQA0027204793 lost by EVRi   As it has not been possible to resolve this matter amicably, and it is apparent that court action may be necessary, I write in compliance with the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct.   I have been in contact with customer support numerous times since 08/04/2024. Your driver marked the item “Returning to sender” without a valid attempt at delivery. The package is since then stuck in limbo with no further tracking updates, and as of today 03/05/2024 still says “on its way back to sender”. I have spoken to your representatives many times and they did not offer any help trying to track down the missing parcel or offer me any option for compensation. I have explained that I am both the sender and the recipient, and I am therefore within my rights to claim compensation for this missing item. I have full records of the item from the point of purchase, to its journey with DHL in the USA, and with EVRi in the UK, until it was lost in the system. The value of the item including shipping is £202.88.   From you I am claiming £202.88 paid in full to compensate the price of the item (£185.01) plus international shipping (£17.87).    Listed below are the documents on which I intend to rely in my claim against you: Screenshots of transaction made with the original seller of the item, including photographs of the item and Paypal transaction. Screenshots of the item received by Stackry in the USA and shipping cost via Global Mail Direct to my address in the UK. Screenshots of tracking with DHL Screenshots of tracking with EVRi Email correspondence with various customer support members at EVRi     I can confirm that I would be agreeable to mediation and would consider any other system of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in order to avoid the need for this matter to be resolved by the courts.  I would invite you to put forward any proposals in this regard.  In closing, I would draw your attention to paragraphs 15 and 16 of the Practice Direction which gives the courts the power to impose sanctions on the parties if they fail to comply with the direction including failing to respond to this letter before claim.  I look forward to hearing from you within the next 14 days. Should I not receive a response to my letter within this time frame then I anticipate that court action will be commenced with no further reference to you.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sequence,Brown&Merry,Conn ells Group - bad lot!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4200 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi - this is the nearest topic I can find to post in.

 

I believe Ive been duped into a contract with these guys under false pretenses

- having said that it would not hurt "to test the water" and pu tthe house on the market to see what gives

and that it wouldnt cost me anything

 

 

it now seems that the agent is trying to get nearly £500 from me within 14 days and if I dont pay up

- despite their never having sent one person round -

they will charge me 3% on top of Barclays Banks base rate on the bill??!!

 

 

I believe they breached any contract we may have had right from the start

and I certainly do not intend to give them all this money for doing very very little indeed

and going directly against what they said while sitting in myhouse!

 

 

Am I right in saying that this all comes under Contract Law. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of my pet subjects I HATE ESTATE AGENTS!!!! Now thats off my chest lets move on.

 

Yes it is a contract law matter. For this contract to be legally enforceable you must have been given a NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CANCEL IN THE PRESCRIBED FORM contained in the written contract.

 

Failure to provide this mandatory written notice render's the contract un enforceable in law.

 

The relavent legistration is The Cancellation Of Contracts Made In A Consummers Home Or PLace Of Work Ect, Regulations 2008 SI 2008 NO.1861

 

Although this is untested in the County Court's, the Office Of Fair Trading surport this veiw (I have a test case pending).

 

So my humble advice is, point out these matters to your "ever so bright Estate Agent" and tell them to sue you!! Oh by the way failing to provide a cancellation notice is a CRIMINAL OFFENCE PUNISHABLE by a fine of up TO £5000 YES £5000 pounds!!! Tell them if they do not confirm the cancellation of there account in writing you will report the matter to the prossucuting body(TS) that should do the trick!!

 

I am of course replying to your post on the understanding that you were not given a cancellation notice--------- I have yet to see an Estate Agents marketing contract that complied with the law.

 

Let us know how you get along

Edited by lawdoctor
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - thanks - I'll dig out all the papers but had nothing apart from the contract as far as I recall - there are many pages of small print to get through! - didnt have a copy for ages and had to ask for it so the seven days to cancell period has past

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading between the lines:

 

- An estate agent cannot market a property without a Home Inspection Pack (HIP).

 

- Typically, an estate agent will charge £500 to arrange for a HIP (even though they only cost £150 if you go direct to a HIP provider - but that is another story).

 

Did they arrange for a HIP to be prepared?

 

Long and the short - you cannot now "test the market" (ie. get dupes to come round without having any real intention to sell) without at least some outlay of money.

 

That said, it is entirely true that estate agents lie through their teeth in order to get business - so read up on what lawdoctor says.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again campri 2

 

Along with the above,your Estate Agent must be a member of an ombudsman scheme in accordance with the Estate Agents(Redress Scheme) Order 2008 SI 1712

 

This law came into force on the 1st October 2008 pursuaunt to schedule 3 of the Estate Agents Act 1979 Tell them to refer any compliant to the scheme's ombudsman who will decide the isssue free of charge.

 

Again it is a criminal offence not to be registerd.( although in fairness 90% are) The ombudsman would not give judgement for the agent unless they had given you the cancellation notice (detailed above).

 

Oh by the way (again) the ombudsman can and proberly would award you

compensation for the breach only a few hundered .POOR OLD ESTATE AGENT!!!!!

Edited by lawdoctor
ERROR
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

HI ALL

 

Here is post i posted over one year ago and a post on PAINSMITH'S SOLICITOR's blog. To my mind this is the first court decision made under these regulations. "ESTATE AGENTS BE WARNED CANCELLATION NOTICE REQUIRED"

 

 

Yes it is a contract law matter. For this contract to be legally enforceable you must have been given a NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CANCEL IN THE PRESCRIBED FORM contained in the written contract.

 

Failure to provide this mandatory written notice render's the contract un enforceable in law.

 

The relavent legistration is The Cancellation Of Contracts Made In A Consummers Home Or PLace Of Work Ect, Regulations 2008 SI 2008 NO.1861

 

I am of course replying to your post on the understanding that you were not given a cancellation notice--------- I have yet to see an Estate Agents marketing contract that complied with the law.

 

 

20 March, 2011 • 23:40 0

Cancellation Notice

 

In a recent case in Watford County Court an agent sought his commission for the successful sale of a property in October 2009.

The Defendant defended the claim on the basis that no Cancellation

Notice in the prescribed form pursuant to the Cancellation of Contracts in a Consumer’s home or Place of Work etc Regulations 2008 had been served.

In response to this defence the agent was relying on schedule 3 of the Regulations which excludes certain contracts from the Regulations. One such contract is for the sale or rental of immovable property.

However, the court held that the contract entered into by the parties was not a contract for the sale or rental of immovable property but one of marketing and as such schedule 3 did not apply.

The court also held that this was a commission contract and therefore caught by the Regulations. Therefore where no Cancellation Notice had been provided then pursuant to clause 7(6) the contract is unenforceable.

The agent’s case was dismissed.

Thank you to Mr Kennedy who brought this case to our attention.

 

LAWDOCTOR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - thats very interesting

-wonder what other contracts this then applies to?

 

 

meantime - dont know if I still have the papers but it all went very quiet re my estate agents demands for monies

- then ages later I had a demanding letter from a DCA.

 

 

I ignored that until such time they tried to take legal action

 

 

at which point I would have given them the info on the breach of contract of their client first.

 

 

The only thing that now bothers me is getting any crap info taken off my credit file if necessary as,

 

 

I think I'm right in saying, the reference agencies wont take any info from me directly as evidence.

 

thanks.

lyn

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Estate Agents do not get a bad press for nothing.

 

Had dealings with Brown & Merry, one of the many and various companies all under Connells Group and apparently part of, or owned by, the Skipton Building Society.

 

....................... et al are in fact Connells, or is it Seqeunce Homes,

..hard to tell the way they have all these 'entitites' that includes sub prime lenders like Amber.

 

Having been stupid to believe their salesmen when they said, yes yes, try it, put it on the market, it wont cost you anything,..

 

.. and here we are years later having been stung for hundreds of pounds now for their useless service and total incompetence I am livid.

issues about HIPs and what they did and didn't do

 

- I being the vulnerable party in all this have to pay them

- it is disgraceful, outrageous and downright dishonest:-x:-x

Edited by dx100uk
names moved
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been done for over £600 by Sequence UK,

 

 

who operate lots of different estate agents in your high streets like Brown & Merry, Wm. H. Brown, Barnard Marcus etc.

 

 

They are all part of Connells Group.

 

 

I was told I would not have to pay a HIP and signed a 12 week contract to have my property sold. It was a totally useless and appalling service but it did run the twelve weeks. I wrote to them saying I didn't want them to roll it over into another 12 weeks or whatever they might try to do and they have now taken me to court for the HIP cost plus extra's and said that I withdrew from the contract so they had a right to be paid for their useless inaccurate HIP, which was never completed at the time anyway. I believe they have backdated all these papers of theirs way after the fact, it is nearly 3 years since all this crap and now they have won a judgement for the money. I am so very very cross about this. I don't see why they should have been given this. Anything I can do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you defend?

 

If these are a penalty, do what they have done and Issue against them!

Hi - I did defend but had a hard time with the DJ. Sequence UK Ltd contracts basically require you to pay them in all scenarios, even for cancelling within their cooling off period! I am confident that there terms would be judged an Unfair and there is certainly no transparency. The staff do not stand in front of you telling you that the moment you sign you will be liable for cost, even if you cancel later the same day. You cannot see a HIP without paying and then if it is **** they will still want paying. It is an appalling situation and must be challenged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well HIPS are now not required, so that should not arise again.

they were always not worth the paper they were printed on as did not go far enough, but at that time it was a legal requirement and sellers had to pay for them, whether the property sold or not.

I suspect they would not have succeded with their claim unless it was in their contract, that the cost of the HIPS had to be paid for and what the cost was.

This was quite usual at the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

It might have been "quite usual" but the point here is being mis-led, being told specifically that you will not have to pay anything face to face. The same company were sued before in court for their representatives behaviour but it still is the case today that Litigants in person get ****ed over by barristers and solicitors, the starting point is never even and fair and transparent and the government offer no respite for consumers. It seems that all business nowadays is designed to trap any many people as possible into paying endless premiums, interest and costs, cars, mortgages, credit cards, bank accounts, loans; little wonder that overseas companies love Britain, we have none of the restrictions that some other countries do. Doorstep selling and new companies backed by MPs that offer instant money with horrendous interest rates - it is appalling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

get if your chest then!

the point is they would not have to pay for it if they sold the house.

As it was not sold, then and I suspect it was in the contract that the HIP would have to be paid for, EA had to pay for it to be produced, and include it in their deal and part of their fee.

It was a failed goverment scheme, and that was how it was dealt with then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

get if your chest then!

the point is they would not have to pay for it if they sold the house.

As it was not sold, then and I suspect it was in the contract that the HIP would have to be paid for, EA had to pay for it to be produced, and include it in their deal and part of their fee.

It was a failed goverment scheme, and that was how it was dealt with then.

Hi - yes, indeed, if thats what happened but: they did not produce a HIP at the time, they did not give access to a HIP at the time, they did not even sign the contract but - hey ho - it arrived in court with a signature on it being a photocopy of course and to date they still refuse to disclose the original papers - but, yes, it does feel great getting it aired, even if it only serves to warn others - thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...