Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • nope. shows you've not been reading up. dx  
    • Done! Thanks again. Will update the thread accordingly.
    • Thank you for your message.  I'm concerned that by complaining to the IPC, and escalating the situation, PCM would be even more inclined to cause problems for me and take action to the fullest extent just to make an example of me.  I can still take the above action as a backup plan if PCM decides to go ahead.
    • Mr BankFodder you are a top man. I just received email below and finally they accepted fully refund Good Afternoon, Thank you for your recent email. We are sorry to hear of your recent troubles, we would be happy to accept rejection of the vehicle. The amount of the refund to yourself will be £7,099, this alongside settlement of the finance agreement will be paid in full and final settlement.  By accepting this refund you are confirming that no further claims shall be brought against Big Motoring World or any of its associates in respect of this matter. In order to proceed with the refund we require the following from yourself: - Your bank details (Account holders name – this must match the invoice name, sort code and account number) The bank details can be provided via email. The refund will be processed within 14 days.  
    • How do I transfer my number plate V750? Transfer by post Check the expiry date on your V750 or V778 to make sure it is still valid. Ensure that the registered keeper for the receiving vehicle matches the Grantee or Nominee name on the certificate. Complete relevant sections of your V750 or V778 document and sign it where instructed. https://www.gov.uk/personalised-vehicle-registration-numbers/renew-private-number-certificate  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

OH's Old Lloyds Loan - prob SB'd


penmarine

Recommended Posts

Yes Brig same people same location.

 

Solicitors for rent to DCAs

Was the PPI a single premium payment added to the balance?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it was, the PPI is all sorted and paid, I'm just wanting to deal with LTSB on behalf of the long haired colonel and not these people. Just wondering if anyone has had dealings with them and what is the best course of action; as I cannot find the way ahead at the moment with getting it back to the OC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the account has been sold to IQOR then reverting to LSTB is not going to happen easily.

 

Write to the Compliance Manager at IQOR

 

ref: as on their letter.

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

I refer to the alleged debt for £xxxxx for which no liability or obligation is acknowledged, I require you to confirm within 72 hours the legal ownership of the alleged debt, until this information is received no further correspondence can be entered into.

 

I also remind you that all communication MUST be in writting, telephone calls, |SMS text messages or e-mails are not acceptable.

 

Get that off RD asap.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure #2 is correct.

If you are successful in a ppi claim then the account should be put back into the state it would be in without the ppi and the interest you paid on the ppi portion then refunded to you in the form of a cheque.

The account cannot remain the same balance as you would still be paying interest on the ppi part of the debt if that were the case.

you should SAR Loyds and get under the skin of what they have actually done (or not) so you can get to a true balance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hi Caggers

I know its been a long time since my last post as I've actually been batting off DCAs for the last few years, increasing my toilet roll stock and sort of getting our credit files back on track.

However the wife got a letter from Judge and Preistley, bottom feeders for 1st Credit saying they would like £6500+ for the old LTSB loan which was in dispute from Nov 2010 (this was the last payment date but I very much doubt they could prove this) and as far as I'm concerned the loan is still in dispute.

My query is do I just ignore them like I have all the other companies begging for money on this disputed account?

Also the loan doesn't show on my wife credit file anywhere at all across the 3 CRAs are these jokers just waiting for me to write to them as they "may" issue court proceedings as its going to turn SB in Nov 16?

I'm just inclined to ignore but the wife is getting itchy feet and wants to send a SB letter.

Cheers PM

Link to post
Share on other sites

you know it is probably not SB so dont send that letter.

I would suggest waiting to see if they send another letter as they may well be just testing the waters to see if you bite.

Should you get one then send a CCA request and see what they come up with.

They cant go much further without satisfying that request and I bet that the original paperwork is long gone so will take an age to come up with anything at all.

(annual statements, NOA's etc)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Lloyds failed to satisfy your dispute with them, then I would say that you're pretty safe to ignore the phishing letter.

 

If Lloyds wanted this money then they would have acted a lot sooner than this.

 

Has this been sold?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lloyds OH's loan & AIC& Rway - Account Balance Following PPI Refund
  • 4 years later...

The OH had letter from Resolvecall regarding a very old LTSB debt at the start of the month.

Knowing it was SB, I sent off the SB letter to Intrum who owns the debt.

They responded to the OH last week when I was away.

They said speak to Resolvecall and the standard letter, we'll pop to your house malarkey....

Just ignore as Intrum own the debt and from the looks of it have ignored the SB letter?

The OH gets twitchy with these things,

thanks PM.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to OH's Very old SB LTSB debt now with Intrum/Resolvecall

let 'em get on with it.

they nor you have actually read what consequences under CONC mentioned in our SB letter mean under the law.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this her old loan?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

must be i've merged it and updated the title too.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to OH's Old Lloyds Loan - prob SB'd

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...