Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Barclaycard PPI claim following SAR


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4053 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a current Barclaycard which was taken out in April 1995 and included PPI. I cancelled the PPI in January 2010 and now preparing to make a claim.

Following SAR to Barclaycard I have now received 6 years of statements which show that I paid over £1200 in PPI but do not have any more info on the previous 11 years. Any advice on what I should do next

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

avg out the ppi payments from the statements you have

 

and use that figure from month 2 of the card

This fourth spreadsheet is useful in calculating a regulatory based compound interest award for PPI on a Revolving Credit Account. Not all statements are required for this sheet because it will work out the compound interest on the PPI payments you do know about. It will not work out the additional 8% interest, to do that you will need spreadsheet three above AND all of your statements.

 

FosCISheet v101.xls

 

dont forget the fos cq too

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your help.

 

From the statements I have (38 months) I have worked out an average of £31.57 per month PPI,

With regard to the spreadsheet, do I now list this figure for each month from month 2 (May 1995) to the date I cancelled PPI (Jan 2010), and what interest rate should I enter?.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

use the avg from month 2 until the figure of the first real statement.

then use the real figures.

 

yes list every month

 

use their latest int rate or an avg in rate

 

they'll soon pickup if its wrong.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.stoozing.com/mon2yr.htm

 

whichever the greater

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great.

I have now completed the spreadsheet (from May 95) using avg of known figures and filled in real figures for the rest. I cant believe that the total comes out at over 32K at 19.9% APR.

I will send this off with FOS cq and covering letter and see what happens.

Thanks for the help

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes its amazing what they have made out of punters

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have just received an offer from Barclays and would be grateful for your input and advice.

 

Brief history

  • Barclaycard Visa since 1995 (from SAR I discovered that the card number changed in April 2000, although still continued as Visa)
  • PPI cancelled in 2010
  • Statements for 6 years
  • With help from this forum I calculated 6 years of known PPI and used the monthly average for unknown period on compound interest calculation spreadsheet
  • Total calculation on spreadsheet = £20k (not £32k I first calculated)
  • Spreadsheet, FOS questionnaire and covering letter sent to Barclays

In the letter Barclays have stated the following -

“We are not required to retain statements information for more than 6 years and the value of payments made since 2005 have been taken directly from statements we do hold. If the sale occurred prior to 2005, where statement records are available, the value of payments has been taken directly from them. However if statement records have not been retained, we will use details from the first available statement on our records and work back to the point at which the policy was sold. This is based on the assumption that your PPI charges and balance would have reduced at a steady rate to zero. If the first two statements available for your account show a value of zero then we have assumed that the balance on your account was also zero for the period dating back to when the policy was sold. We would be happy to recalculate the offer amount if you are able to provide statement information for some or all of that period, prior to 2005, where this has not been retained”

 

They go on to say -

Please accept this letter as our final response to your complaint. Please be aware that you have the right to refer your complaint to FOSetc etc.

 

The refund has been worked out as follows

  • Refund of payments made by you for PPI cover = £2482
  • Refund of interest charged on PPI premiums = £2558
  • 8% simple interest per annum = £2250

It appears that they have calculated the refund based on 6 years of statements and of course I cannot be sure of the PPI payments I made prior to this

 

My question is would you accept the offer or do you think there is any mileage to be gained by pursuing this further.

 

Thanks for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so from birth to the first statement they are saying you did not use the card.....

 

yea ok...ruddy fleecers!!

 

point that fact out!

 

its not logically you would get a card AND NOT USE IT.

 

your method is actually as per the FOS website examples.

 

they are also 'offering' for you to take this as their final response [clever play on words]

 

YOU ARE NOT!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Sorry about the late response but just got internet back after 2 weeks without (typical Virgin).

 

the short answer is No

 

I wrote to Barclays as advised and stated that their offer fell a long way short of the compound interest calculations

I supplied in spreadsheet form which is the regulatory method of calculation using FOS guidelines.

 

I asked them to review the calculations or supply me with a full and detailed breakdown of their calculations.

 

I then received a letter stating that the offer was correct and explaining how they go about working out this type of claim

but they did not supply me with any breakdown of figures.

 

Interestingly they stated that they are not obliged to keep statements for more than 6 years but went on to say

in your case we have statement information from 2001 and have used an average of payments to calculate the value of payments made prior to 2001”

 

This annoyed me because following a SAR in July, I only received statements from 2006.

 

I then wrote back stating that statements from 2001 had obviously been withheld from me and requested these were forwarded to me along

with a full and detailed breakdown of calculations.

 

This letter was passed on to the SAR team who have now sent me the same information I received in July (a basic summary of the accounts I held with Barclays).

 

So I still have not received a breakdown of calculations or statements from 2001.

 

I will now be demanding this information again in a strongly worded letter

and if I still do not get the information I require,

I may have to consider the FOS route.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ICO first for non compliance

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent a strongly worded letter and I have also copied and pasted the paragraph below from the FSA website. I sent a copy to David Chan & Philip McHugh by mail it needs more people to complain about thier calculations. I'm sure they haven't got a clue. When I have requested the interest rate they use they cannot give me an answer. One of thier staff phoned me and said I don't get involved in calculations . Then why are you phoning Me !!!! My letter detailed inlaymens terms what they should be doing whether it works or not is another matter. If enough people complain surely they will revisit. This is now the 3rd time they have had to recalculate and still no details. The trouble is they take so long its been over a month now and the details I got were in regard to a letter written on 30th October which still is not in my hands. That was in response to my letter dated 3rd . I now fax first and then send recorded so they get it twice and copies to the top guys. Hopefully may get somewhere or its off to FOS

  • The cancellation of the PPI policy (if it is still in place).
  • The reconstruction of the credit-card account, to work out what the current balance would have been (where the account remains open) – or what the closing balance would have been (where the account has been cleared or closed) – if the consumer had made the same monthly payments but without PPI. This should be calculated by deducting the PPI premiums and the interest and charges that resulted from those premiums (including those arising because the ongoing monthly balance on the credit-card account was higher than it would have been, if the consumer had made the same payments to an account without PPI).
  • A statement showing the resulting balance on the credit-card account – to be sent to the customer along with details of how it was calculated.
  • If the reconstruction produces a credit balance for any period, the payment of interest (normally at the rate of 8% simple per year) on the credit balances for the period that the account was in credit. This element of the compensation may be subject to income tax. Our note is compensation taxable? provides more information about the tax treatment of this part of the compensation.
  • The consideration of a payment for distress and inconvenience – for example, where the financial business rejected a complaint that it knew (or should have known) that the ombudsman service would uphold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems that they cannot give straight answers to the simplest of requests. May I ask anney63 if you have had an offer, and if so is it a long way from your calculations.

 

Thanks for the IOC link dx100uk. I may write again and use the non compliance as a lever in getting them to re calculate or send me the calculations. If not its IOC and then perhaps FOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:roll:Had 2 offers the second had interest figure less than the first and I gave them all the deatails as to why they need to send me new calculation but they just didn't read the letter. They are way off. Cannot get an interest rate use from them It needs more complaints I think people are accepting without realising they are being ripped off. Sent another letter yesterday by fax and recorded delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Chased up letter has been sent from Directors office WOW .

 

Apparently they are now sending more information dating back to 2001 and state that thier figure is correct.

 

Until I get the letter I can't comment.

 

I did say if you have this information why didnt you send it when requested with my SAR no comment.

 

I honestly believe that the ICO need to really clamp down on Barclaycard.

 

It is obvious they are witholding information.

 

Will post when I receive letter it is in my friends hands so hopefully will get it tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unbelievable!!!!.

 

I’m still waiting for a reply from my last letter strongly requesting them to send me exactly the same info i.e detailed breakdown of calculations and statements from 2001.

 

I have cited non compliance following SAR and threatened ICO.

 

I will now follow your example Anney 63 and post to directors and ICO.

 

I will be interested to find out the response you receive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update on progress

Still being fobbed off.

 

Every time I request statements from 2001 (the ones they state that they based their calculations on) and a detailed breakdown of calculations, they send me a copy of the final response letter first issued on 11th Oct (3rd one now)

 

On 10th Nov I gave them 7 days to comply with my requests and threatened ICO

 

On 30th Nov I sent ICO all the info including copies of correspondence, but due to a backlog of cases ICO say that I probably wont be allocated a case officer for another month.

 

So I am now considering court action and have been following a similar post at http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?350191-Barclaycard-SAR

and have followed the links from Slick132 regarding court action which are most helpful.

 

I am not unfamiliar with court processes as I recently took legal action against a non paying tenant in which I represented myself in court, but before I follow this course of action I would be grateful of any help and advice from members of this forum.

 

Firstly I know that I will have to send Barclays a letter before action which I will prepare and post on the forum, but my main concern is the N1 form. This at the moment is not a claim for money but a way of getting Barclays to disclose the information I requested. I do not want to complicate things by claiming for damage or distress but I would obviously claim court costs

 

So my questions at the moment are

 

1) What do I put down as Defendants name

2) What address do I use (ie Barclays HQ, SAR team or PPI claims dept)

3) What value do I state on N1 form (if any).

 

Thanks in advance for any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...