Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Dave. This morning I had another message from the owner, saying she's rung Booking.com again to ask them to sort the cancellation. And I just took a call from what looks like Booking.com's UK number. They offered us alternative accommodation but I had already found something on the Booking.com site two days ago. So we aren't homeless next weekend and Booking.com said we can invoice them after our stay finishes, so they can refund us the difference in cost between the original booking and the new one. Without your information on how property owners deal with Booking.com, I'm not sure the owner lady would have sorted this, so a big thank you from us. HB PS An email has just arrived from Booking.com. They confirm that the payment due won't be taken from my card - this was a concern obviously. I checked both my cards yesterday and I didn't make a payment from either of them when I booked. I couldn't remember when the problem happened because I made the booking a while back.
    • It's not for exactly £300 I just rounded the figure l. I don't know why I didn't respond to previous letter I suppose I thought If I ignored it it would go away.    I have uploaded all the docs I can find, I have defended the claim and will get a CPR sent to Morality Law today.    Claim Form.pdf
    • So as predicted relieved dq from Overdale.  Checked MCOL transaction history. Last entry is defence received.  Am I reading that correctly?   my understanding is I I ignore and wait for courts to send one they have also ticked mediation box. Not sure what can be mediated. He is unemployed 
    • Hi  I've received letters acknowledging that overdales have received my caa request and CPR request. No info. I'm going to post you my defence for to look at tonight or tomorrow morning. H
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

intrum justica


gooser
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5577 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all. I have just received a rather formal letter from Interim Justica who claim to be acting on behalf of Ebay. The say I owe £46.84 and if I don't pay within 10 days a county court claim will be issued and I will have to pay the following:

Ebay £46.84

Court Fees £20.00

Solicitors Costs £50.00

Total Amount £116.84

I don't owe Ebay anything. They either have the wrong person or it's just a mistake. I have phoned them who told me to contact Ebay. I have had no response from numerous emails to Ebay and the 10 days are nearly up.

I know that they have put bad marks on my credit rating and they refuse to remove them.

Any advice would be fantastically appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Here's what I sent Intrum Justicia when they contacted me about an apparent eBay account:

 

RE: Alleged outstanding eBay account

Reference: xxxxx

Creditor Reference: xxxxx

 

 

To Whom It May Concern:

 

I am writing in response to your letter (copy included) of 6th October 2006 in which you claim I owe the sum of £30.73 with regards to an eBay account in my name. Please be advised that I do not have an eBay account, nor will I be paying any money to Intrum Justicia or eBay International AG.

 

Please take this as a formal warning that I do not take too kindly to un-solicited letters from companies requesting money. Your letter offers no evidence (nor does it offer to provide any) of any alleged debt/outstanding account. To put my mind at rest, as I’m sure this is all a mis-understanding, I require you furnish me with a signed agreement between eBay and myself that outlines the account you mention.

 

If you cannot/will not supply this information, I will have to make a Data Protection Act 1998 Subject Access Request in order to find out how you obtained my details, and where this alleged “debt” came from. The Subject Access Request is a legal procedure which you, by law, have to follow. I fully intend to carry out this procedure if I find the documentation you supply (at my informal request) fails to address my concerns.

 

At this time - as there is no documentation to support this claim - I am unable to assist with this matter. Please ensure that any future correspondence includes all the relevant documentation – Failure to provide this will result in me having to take legal action as I consider your efforts at money extortion to be tantamount to harassment. Please also be advised that calls to my telephone number (shown above) may be recorded.

 

Due to your lack of signed documentation between myself and the original creditor, you may formally consider this “debt” in dispute – and as such, you are not permitted to attempt collection of this money without first referring back to the original creditor. If I do not hear from you within 7 days, I shall consider this matter closed and no further correspondence will be entered into.

It's fairly agressive in it's wording, but it gets the message across.

The BidsterMeister

Helper of the hapless and hopeless...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still waiting, actually... Just outlining to them that you're no pushover is usually enough to make them cough-up some evidence, or slink off into the night. If it really is a simple case of "same name, wrong person", then you have nothing to worry about.

The BidsterMeister

Helper of the hapless and hopeless...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Just reading your post , I have had exactly the same problem - I have written a strong letter and also made a complaint against one of there employees , as to how I was spoken to.

Anyway , how did you get on?

Thank goodness I found this site!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi guys!

I am new to the forum but was browsing through when i saw this thread about intrum justicia.

I have had numerous dealings with them, in particular when Virgin Media set them onto us for supposedly failing to pay a bill- when our accounts were still active,the services still being delivered, and the money going out by direct debit!

In my experience with this company,i would strongly suggest to anyone who has dealings with them to stand your ground and fight it out if you believe you have cause to..

They are a debt collection agency amongst other things- and as such they operate as one-threatening letters,uncompasisnate call handlers etc.. whatever it takes to get YOUR money!.

I congratulate the write of the letter within this thread.Its fantastically written and a brilliant counter threat to put the wind up them.

In my experience in the past, these collection companies ppray on peoples ignorance of consumer credit law to get money out of them.In part, their operations include reliance on the naivety that not everyone they threaten will know the law or their options, and as such can be tricked or frightened into paying up.

Whats more, Intrum Justicia was last night featured on BBC Ones Watchdog, over the way that it handled supposed debt collections on behlaf of Brittania Music ltd, the online company which folded earlier this year..

The compaints highlighted within Watchdog are disturbingly identical to the cases highlighted here- Intrum Justicia sending out threatening letters, which contain no proof, or evidence of the debt. This is NOT correct!

And im glad that someone is standing up to them. The letter is FANTASTIC and will warrant a meticulous reply frm the company jobsworths rather than a standard pc generated template letter, which they send out all the time.

I will follow this thread with eagerness for the outcome!

Well done again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

I have just accessed information about Intrum Justica on the web and found this forum so first let me say hi to everyone.

 

Over the last couple of months I have received a number of demands from this company. Like other other forum users I do not owe any money to the companies concerned and I have written to Intrum Justica in strong terms informing them of this.

 

My instinct tells me that this company is using illegal tactics in an attempt to scare people into paying up when they do not owe anything. I suspect strongly that it is a complete con trick. I wonder how many people, particularly the elderly, have fallen for this and paid up out of fear.

 

I have reported the matter to the police.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi I Have Recently Received A Letter From Ij Stating That I Owe £8.00 From My Ebay Account Due Late Payment They Say It Is A Admin Charge As The Non Payment Was Paseed To Them On The 24th Of October 2008 My Cheque Cleared With Ebay On The 28th Of October In There Letter They Are Ststing Legal Proceedings Do I Pay ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi peps, i had an issue with paypal and ebay last year. i sold some wii's and xboxs which i bought in bulk to raise some cash, as we all like to do.

the items were bought by someone which was fine. a few weks went past then i get an email from paypal for a dispute against me saying the items had not been deliverd.

to cut a long story short i was conned and the buyer said he never had them, i deliverd them personaly so didnt get a signiture.

 

i argued with paypal and ebay about this but to no avail. i end up with a letter from the famous intrum justica oweing the buyer the full amount £1800. i had no why of proving that i had deliverd them so had to pay to avoid bailiffs calling which i was threatned with. i have been paying £20 a month for 9 months then when i phoned to make another payment the bill had gone up to £2600. (fell of my chair) they said it was another claim made against me. i dont even have an account anymore with ebay or paypal.

when i questioned this they said contact paypal.....i have done this numerouse times but have heard nothing back.

 

think i might just stop paying and leav it see what happens, what you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

who are intrum justica i know they are a dca but they are a new one to me.

ive just had an obnoxious p/call from them regarding mrs sopwith

they said they were trying to locate her. my answer so am i put anything for her in writing and ill forward it to her solicitor

the little girl at other end didnt have an answer to that

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...