Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So I just found a couple abandoned traffic cones locally by some bins.   A bit squished but free!  So have placed them on the land.  Will wait to see if the cones get moved and signs ignored again this week before I consider rocks/ boulders.
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later the your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. So if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place and park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and then unload the children followed by reloading the children getting seat belts on etc before driving to the exit stopping for cars, pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
    • Hi  no nothing yet. Hope it stays that way 😬
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Equifax still showing bad credit after 6 years


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3512 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Sorry that my question is a little basic but like most new people im having trouble getting my head around the rules. Plus i have terrible baby brain at the moment!

 

After a long 6 years of repairing my credit history (which is now in the excellent category! :wink:) I have just checked my equifax report, as i will shortly be needing to apply for a mortgage, to find out that I can still view old credit agreements including late payments and a default which stretch back past the 6 year limit. are equifax displaying this information on my credit checks and are they allowed to? should i be applying for them to remove it?

 

Also does the six year limit date from the last acknowledgement of payment, or the default notice? i.e. if the last payment in relation to a debt was paid in July, the first non payment in August and the Default to a DC in Nov, when would it become written off?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Email or call them and theyll update their records. If its been more than 6 years, then it will drop off. Sometimes the entires just need a little push. The 6 year timer starts from the moment the entry is listed on the report. No matter what happens, it gets removed on the 6 year mark and cannot be relisted.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks renegadeimp,

 

After looking a bit more am i right in understanding the account information becomes invisible on credit checks 6 years after its last entry even if i can see it myself?

 

So technically accounts that were settled and ended in 06 but I can still see all payment history for since 2004 will become invisible in sept 2012?

 

And my larger worry...

 

The defaulted account....

 

1. last acknowledgement and payment made in July 06, thus this month am i right in thinking it becomes statute bared?

 

2. Default issued in Nov 06, so does this mean i have to wait until December 12 until it becomes invisible and i can apply for a mortgage or credit card (not that i want or need to use a credit card, just to help things on their way) even though i have a higher than average credit rating?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope. If its listed, then ANYONE can see it who is searching your file. When they drop off, they vanish. To everyone including yourself.

 

Remember, its from the date of default. If there are bad payment markers for more than 6 months before the 6 years are up, then you should really get in touch with the compliance manager or ICO, as a default needs to be recorded within 6 months of the incident that caused the non payments.

 

So in answer to your questions:

 

1. It will drop off your file this month and will become SB. Howeever, creditors can still chase the debt, but not enforce it through court. If this happens, simply send them the SB letter from the library on CAG, and that will be the end of that debt.

 

2. Yep.

 

In regards to you getting a mortgage, it is unlikely you will get one unless you get a guarantor or your partner has a good record. This is because the majority of lenders are now looking at 3-6 years of clear and good credit history now to even consider giving people a mortgage.

Your credit score is not a end all be all solution. It is simply a guide for lenders searching your file. Most lenders have their own comprehensive inhouse system in place. You could be denied for having a CCJ, default ( even though it expires this month), you could even be denied for having 1 late payment marker on your account. It is completely up to the lender how they score your file. The CRA's credit score is meant as a very relaxed guide.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

So technically im debt free from the end of this month :-D. But if i have to wait a couple more months to apply for stuff, then thats what ill do.

 

Stupidly i let an ex take advantage of my name when i was younger and have been clearing it up ever since, a very hard lesson to learn.

 

I will check back in september to ensure that the old settled accounts are beginning to drop off and then again in december to check that the default has gone, if not i will contact equifax to get it removed. Apart from that my credit history is lovely and shiny and has been since 2006.

 

 

Thanks ever so much for your kind advice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt that reaches its 6th birthday expires this month is your only one on the file, then yes. Just remember, on their 6th birthday they go, but sometimes the CRA's can be slow to update their records. Sometimes taking 2-4 weeks. Thats why i said, give them a week after the expiry then ask them to update.

 

Make sure you check all 3 agencies, just to make sure that all entries line up and there arent any entries that have been made with different dates or without your knowledge.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that a default entry is removed after 6 years may not

necessarily mean that the debt is statute barred you need to check

the dates of the last payment and or written acknowledgment of the

debt.

 

Remember also that until you inform the creditor in writting that the

debt IS statute barred and you will therefore not be paying they can

still press for payment, but cannot enforce the debt in court.

 

You will see historic entries on your files.

 

Credit scores are a day to day indication for You to see how yo may be considered

for credit.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, so historic entries even if they stretch back prior to the 6 years are still visible then and thus i and other people will always be able to see them?

 

I am certain of the July date for it becoming statue barred as it was the last date that anyone acknowledged it by payment or in writing, i have checked. I made sure of this a few years back when i found out what had happened and they were in fact chasing me and not the **** bag whose debt it actually was (i was such i naive child when i was younger, hence the awful mess i let myself get into). Anyway i found my way here, and thank god I did because the advice and support i received not to mention the wonderful resources the kind people have supplied for others to use helped me successfully halt the DCAs from bothering me again by issuing them with a CCA and then an account in dispute letter. If they try coming after me now i will get the statute bared letter off to them so fast it will make their heads spin.

 

Ive done my time now, and ive been good and learnt my lesson. i have learnt to save, dont rely on credit (only having the bare minimum to repair and keep my credit rating ticking over) and never buy when i cant afford it. I want to be able to get on with my life now and build a safe home for myself and my new family, hence the fact i am trying to plan the exact time when i can apply for a mortgage so i am not hindering our chances of being successful.

 

So to recap then....

 

the defaulted account will be statute barred from the end of July, the default will expire at the end of November, and I can apply for a mortgage in December without the fear of the default appearing on my now otherwise spotless for 6 years credit history? Should i or should i not be able to see the default after the beginning of December so i know whether to get onto the CRAs to remove it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Other people cant see them once theyve fallen off.

 

If they coulld there would be little point with the 6 year removal rule.

Edited by renegadeimp

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are there for your gudance and can useful if ''old''

matters suddenly show up again, as they often do.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have a very similar case to indigo_child.

The default was recorded as of October 2006 and after 6 months the debt was transferd to a collection agency. Under the threat of getting a CCJ, I agreed to make payments to clear the outstanding amount of £100 a month. As the rest of my history is now virtualy perfect, I have still been making the payments so as not to damage my credit history again.

By reading your replies on this thread, would I be correct in assuming that I need no longer to make payments after November 2012, by simply sending a SB letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO if you have been making payment the debt IS NOT STATUTE BARRED.

 

Definition OF STATUTE BARRED IS:- NO payments to the account to any creditor for 6 clear years and or NO written acknowledgment of liability.

 

Just because a defaulted debt is removed from CRA files DOES NOT MEAN IT IS STATUTE BARRED all defaults are removed after 6 years PAID OR NOT>

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for that.

Is there a legal minimum amount that has to be paid to these agencies?

As the outstanding amount is intrest free and although I have made offers to them in the past to clear the balance (which have been refused), I have no real problems in making them wait for their money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pay what you can realistically afford. DOnt just pay the bare minimum if you can afford more, especially if your creditors start asking for I&E forms or budget summaries.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just note DCAs/Creditors can request I&E BUT they do not have the right to denand it, it is your money you decide what you can reasonably afford to pay!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the same issue - I contacted Checkmyfile about this & they told me that the entries do not fall off after 6 years; the account (& all entries) show up until 6 years after the account is closed! Is this true? It means that for me bad debt is going to show for a lot longer than 6 years after it happened - eg late payments in 2006, but did not close the accounts until 2009. Can I do anything about this? I have contacted Equifax and have had no response. Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ALL DEFAULTED ACCOUNT are removed on the 6th aniversary of the default date, if an account is NOT Defaulted it will remain for 6 years after the date of settlement or closure..

 

Was that account defaulted or not????

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

First time on the forum but hoping someone can clarify info for me please. Ive looked recently at my credit file and there are a couple of defaults dating back to 2007, obviously I now know they will be removed after 6 years but I am paying a DCA every month towards these debts as they were sold on to them from the original creditor. Financially things still arent good but what rights do they have to take me to court if I can no longer continue to repay them seems as they are not my original creditor. I am getting to my wits end trying to maintain payments and every day bills......... Id aprpeciate some advice, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The entries will be removed on the 6th anniversary of the default as you say.

 

Have you had any statements from the DCA, do you know how much is still owed?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, a substantial amount of money, from what I can afford to pay them it will never get paid off in my lifetime on one and slightly less on the other one. They are managed by two diffeerent companies the larger debt is from a company who are pretty easy to deal with when it comes to DCA the other one are more persistant if you are a day late you get 20 phone calls.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...