Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wrong as usual Jugg    Did Michael Cohen Commit Perjury In The Trump Trial? WWW.ZEROHEDGE.COM ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero Michael Cohen. He still has one day of cross examination ahead of him on Thursday. With the government resting after Cohen’s cross examination, I believe that an honest judge would have no alternative but to grant a motion for a directed verdict and end the case before it goes to the jury. Judge Juan Merchan will now have to give the full measure of his commitment to the rule of law. Given the failure to support the elements of any crime or even to establish the falsity of recording payments as legal expenses, this trial seemed to stumble through the motions of a trial. Michael Cohen was only the final proof of a raw political exercise. For critics, some of Cohen’s answers appear clearly false or misleading. Like their star witness, the prosecutors have shown that they simply do not take the law very seriously when there is an advantage to be taken.
    • So to sum up. 1.  You & your friend did the right thing on 28 December and are in the right legally. 2.  You are in the early stages of the threatening letter cycle.  We've seen these letters quite literally over 10,000 times.  For the moment your friend has nothing to worry about. 3.  No-one will turn up at your friend's door. 4.  If months down the line this got to court, you would win.  It's blatant disability discrimination.  Some time back I looked through the results of Excel v Caggers court cases, well we won 85% of the time, and you would be 100& certain to win. But this is the bit that you won't like ... 5.  Excel don't care that they are legally in the wrong.  They want your money.  They will go on and on with their letters hoping you'll give in. 6.  They are also the most litigious of the private parking companies and it's perfectly possible, months hence, that they will take your friend to court.  You have to be prepared for this.  They would lose.  But they don't care about the losses since, sadly, presumably so many people are afraid of court and so give in and pay.  7.  We will of course support you all the way!
    • Hi, Just updating that I'll be submitting the SJPN shortly this evening electronically.
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Safestyle UK and Barclays Partner Finance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4023 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm new to this and don't know if I have posted in the right place.

 

Last year I had new doors and windows from Safestyle UK. The salesman persuaded me to take 12 months interest free credit arranged through Barclays Partner Finance with the advice to "pay it off or get a cheaper loan". There was no discussion about affordability and no income/expenditure assessment. My (then) partner assured me that he would pay the full amount before it came due.

 

The payments are due to start in August. My "partner" has gone missing (with 20k of my money). I have tried to get another loan but because of my income I can't. Even adding it to my mortgage has been refused as I only have 5 years left so to add 7500 to it would be too expensive.

 

I am now faced with paying 20% APR and my windows are going to cost me over 20K in the next 10 years. I can't afford the repayments and I'm thinking that I might have to sell the home I have worked so hard to keep.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you are in a very bad position. Clearly you should be proceeding against your partner - but if you don't know where he is then that is impossible.

 

Obviously the best thing to do is to try and get another loan - and if it can be secured on your property it will be much cheaper.

 

These people have very strict lending criteria but you should try them any way - http://uk.zopa.com/ I have only heard good things about them so far. Search the BBC website for "peer to peer lending"

 

Additionally I would start making the rounds of brokers. You have time to save the day if you can get a move on.

 

I can't think of any other solution at the moment.

 

One thing is sure, that you will find your ex-partner at some point - and when you do, don't hang around, issue a clim against him immediately and without warning.

In fact if you know his parents address or some other address such as his bank's address, I would consider issuing a claim against him straightaway. You can make a special applicatin to a judge to get an order for "substituted service" which allows you to serve the claim documents to an address where he is likely to have knowledge of them.

Then if he doesn't defend, you can get a default judgment against him.

It won't get you your money but by registering the CCJ against him, you will limit his ability to move around financially. Also, if he does surface, then all you will have to do is to get a warrant of execution to enforce the judgment, rather than having to begin from scratch - http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/S/SubstitutedService.aspx

 

Also, if he has walked off with £20k of your money then I would call the police and get a crime reference number.

 

I think that a campaign to limit his movement as much as possible would pay off in the end.

 

However, for the moment you certainly need to sort out a loan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your swift reply Bankfodder.

 

So far I have only tried RBS who have my bank accounts and mortgage and was refused on the grounds of affordability. I will start looking elsewhere now.

 

I have spoken to the Police regarding my ex but they are of the opinion that it is a civil matter. All of the money I "loaned" him was in cash. I can demonstrate that I withdrew it from the bank but I can't prove where it went. The only thing I can show and I think it's circumstantial is that I withdrew a substantial sum on the same day that his car was registered. The amount I withdrew would match the value of the car but I can't prove it.

 

On the subject of tracing him via his bank, I'm not sure how this would work. I'm guessing that they have an address for him as his bank statements have stopped coming here. All I get now is debt collection letters! If I write to his bank will they forward my letters?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Police will always say that it is a civil matter.

You must write and make the complaint and insist. Show evidence of dishonesty. The police are under-resourced - but also that can be just plain lazy.

People who complain persistently - write to your MP etc will make headway.

 

Write to them. Adress your letter to the Chief inspector admin. However, you will help your case if you can show that ther was dishonesty - he took the money and then just disappeared. He made a promise to repay you while all the time preparing to leave etc etc.

Put together a statement to be used as the basis for your complaint which puts your partner in a bad light and which exploits all the circumstances of the case to produce a resonable suspicion that he acted dishonestly and that the fact that he now doesn't respond to your attempts to contact him through his family, etc are evidence of dishonesty.

 

If you can get the crem reference number then supply a copy fot he report to his bank and get a CIFAS mark against his name. This will further limit him

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • 4 months later...

Sorry to bring this up after so long. I'm now paying £20k for windows and doors that apparently would have cost £7500 cash! I'm wondering if I have any comeback under pressure selling or "duress". The Safestyle rep was in my home from 3pm till 10pm and the only way to get rid of him was to sign up or call the Police as he was going nowhere. I'm quite happy to pay the cost of the installation, it's the interest that's killing me. What can I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...