Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • First of all it sounds as if your retailer is very decent and very responsible. This itself is unusual in these kinds of circumstances and I think we need to bear this in mind. The guarantee is not particularly relevant and in fact the dealer had a statutory duty to exercise a certain responsibility for your computer – probably for several years as their obligation under the consumer rights act. The dealer may not have known this and it simply acting out of a sense of moral responsibility and that is even more noteworthy. You've already suggested earlier that you didn't really want to cause problems for your retailer. I think that you will need the help of your retailer as well in order to get information and evidence. I suggest that you proceed against DPD – but before you do that – I suggest that you have a discussion with the retailer. Tell them that this is what you are going to be doing and you would like to have a copy of anything they have which relates to the special instructions which apparently your dealer has already informed you about in relation to where item should be left. Secondly, maybe you should tell your dealer about this site and also about this thread. I can imagine like many dealers who are frequently sending items by means of couriers, they have had things go missing. Tell them that we will be very happy to help them recover money for lost or damaged or stolen items – and that is regardless of whether or not they have purchased insurance. Apart from being very pleased to help your dealer recover items which have been lost by irresponsible parcel delivery companies, I think we need to encourage the complicity between you and them so they will be pleased to support you in your claim against DPD. It will be helpful if you can get a copy of the instructions that you have referred to above, and also if you can get some written evidence of your own instruction that your laptop should be left in a safe place. Have you done the reading on this sub- forum? You will need to do lots of reading of many of the similar stories on this sub- forum. They won't necessarily be against DPD but the principles will broadly be the same. Also read the pinned topics at the top of the sub- forum in order to understand many of the principles involved. Getting your money back but be quick – but your chances of success are better than 90% that you can bank on it taking anything up to a year. Have you got anything in writing from DPD either refusing you or telling you that they won't discuss with you?  
    • Thank you for telling us the text of the letter you had from the police. As we don't seem to have come across this before, it would be really useful for us to see the original please. HB
    • Pasco has recalled 104,000 packs of sliced bread after rat remains were found in at least two packs.View the full article
    • UPDATE I went rooting through an old box of paperwork I have and I've found the original Default Notice. It is dated **/**/201*, however.. The copy of the Default Notice that they sent with the LBC has a completely different date on it 😮 Can they issue 2 default notices for the same debt? Where they have changed the date on the copy, they have also changed the amount owed through failed payments and how much is required to be paid by a certain date. In addition, they sent (with the 1st LBC) a copy of the termination of the agreement, which I cannot find the original. However, the termination date is 3 days after the date given on the (doctored) Default Notice, by which monies are to be paid by. So, they gave until the 'x' date to pay the arrears, then terminated the agreement 3 days later. I bet a dollar to a dime they've doctored the termination date also.
    • Having looked through the paperwork, I note they have sent 3 seperate LBCs. Two are in the name of FCA Automotive (1st one issued 21 Jan 2020, 2nd one 21 Sept 2022) and the last one (issued 12 Sept 2023) is under CA Auto Finance UK Limited. In the first one, they did send a copy of the default notice, but this was not sent with the 2nd LBC and neither was it sent with the last one either. .  A quick look at the default notice and I see it states the agreement start date was not the same day as the original agreement was signed. It's a day different but do not know if that makes any difference. Also, I note we received a letter on the 16 Nov 2023 which states of a 14 day notice of intention to issue claim form. Heard nothing since that, until this court claim arrived. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Repair shop refuses to return mobile


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4088 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I handed in my phone more than two months ago and since then spend a nice sum phoning them and hearing excuse after excuse. Finally I asked to speak with the manager but "he is in the office and unavailable". I know this is just a phone but this betrail of trust makes it somehow more important. I read here about trading standards and CAB but it seems just a way of spending more on calls for "free" advice. I have their receipt so is there anything that can be done other than MCOL? Do I need to do anything before starting a claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to give a few more details like how long have you had the phone, did you hand it in for repair and for what, is the phone on contract and of so with whom. Then people will be able to advise you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the phone for a while but I didn't buy it there nor it is under contract. I just took it there to be repaired because they are a shop that repairs phones/gadgets. Their name is GSM Repairs and the shop is in Birmingham. I called them more than 10 times and they always give excuses and say that they will call when it is there to be collected. They never call so I call them and then the cycle begins again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it an expensive phone and did they give you a quote/price for the repair and how long it would take?

You need to write to them in the first instance detailing that you want your phone back, preferbly repaired, and give them 7 days to respond or you will take them to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot raydetinu.

Well it was expensive at the time. It looked brand new but it didn't turn on.

They cost more than £200 back then but it is a Nokia and their value is declining fast that's why I kept calling them.

They said that since it was still in the warranty they would send it to Nokia to get it repaired free and it would take about a week. That was about two months ago. Then several times they said it would be back in the next couple of days. Then they admitted it was lost by Nokia. Then they said a replacement was coming from Nokia. I asked to speak with the manager when we fell on the "will be back in the next couple of days" cycle again. I must have spent £10 in calls alone by now.

I will send them a Formal Complaint Letter as I read here, but what do I ask exactly? To have a replacement in the shop within 7 days? What would I accept as replacement?

And would the courts work?

 

Sorry for so many questions. Hope I can help someone with a problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

give them 7 days to offer you a suitable replacement or the value of the phone.

if not then take them to court, you will need some sort of value though! the cost to buy one now on ebay say? as i is an old model.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I already sent the letter, got no reply so will start claim but how do I find who to claim against. Is the firm name on the receipt enough? What if is just a trading name?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

If anyone cares, I started the claim, got no answer, requested judgement and issued an warrant.

Now I received a piece of paper from the court saying that the store moved so they won't recover anything.

I have checked and they are very much there and operating.

I had to pay £130 for this.

Is this court thing some sort of fraud? When I call their number all I get is pre recorded random messages...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Just a query when you put the court documents in for your claim did you name GSM Repair and R3 Grp Limited as they state they are part of R3 Grp Limited?

 

If you also look at GSM Repair Terms and condition it states:

 

Payment:

Our standard payment terms are: Payment upon completion using our instant paypal or Google checkout option from your customer login area, or payment with your order using cheque payment (made payable to R3 Grp Limited). Cheque payments will be subject to normal clearance delays prior to us shipping your order (normally no more than 5 working days, though occasionally longer).

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks stu for checking it out.

 

I did not as I based the claim on the receipt they gave in the shop which is evidence. These guys appear to be opperating under several different names.

 

But now my main worry is if the court is a serious thing or will they just keep my money and do nothing because I can't even phone them. They just waste your phone money in endless recorded messages loops (read out slowly slow).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Were they a reputable company? I mean where did you find their details. If they operate under several different names it sounds pretty bogus to me. Is their number an 09 number by any chance?

Yes Yes, I'm weird. I tried being normal once, was the most boring 5 minutes of my life!:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I searched mobile repair companies, took addresses down from 192.com and then I went there. They are real but dishonest.

 

Now my worry is that the court is doing nothing about it, even after I forked out more than hundred pounds.

This court business looks very shady, they send tiny slips of paper with no reference to who they are, with spelling mistakes, no names and no contacts at all. MCOL customer service passes responsibility around. An embarrassment for an alleged first world country.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...