Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ive locked the old thread post here now. it's how backdoor CCJ's work sadly as he didn't update his 'creditors' he had moved sadly quite legal and to be honest 9/10 nothing can now be done. paying it will NOT resolve the issue a CCJ shows for 6yrs regardless to paid or not or paying or not. you could poss ask whom is refusing his guarantor status for you that if the CCJ is paid, would the issue be resolved, but that will cost you the sum of the judgement. dx  
    • new thread created for this parking CCJ. please only post here now.  
    • So how can the courts then issue a CCJ?! Confirmed by Registry Trust? and issued by CNBC?! 😡  I'll phone again tomorrow and get all the details.
    • dx is wrong there. The reason they did the application with a hearing is likely that they had questions of the application that weren't answered in their wx. nothing to do with your N180 no they are just saying that they want the extension to make it 7.
    • its not a fine! it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Aktiv Kapital ( UK ) LTD


DaleR83
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4397 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hope someone can help.

 

I recently was asked to get an experian credit report for my mortgage

the report came back with a decent 745

but a few things got brought up on it which has meant my mortgage being denied.

 

They are as follows ;

Aktiv Kapital account updated to:9/10/2011

Account type : Bank Started 13/07/2000

Default Date 11/01/2007 Balance £832

And

Aktiv Kapital account updated to : 26/04/2009

Account type : Credit card / store card Started 05/06/2004

Default 23/06/2007 Balance : £352

 

Can any let me know how to remove these defaults so can carry on with mortgage ??

I don't even know what they are for or connected to but have read that Aktiv Kapital regularly try it on.

 

Any help will be much appreciated. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dale Welcome.Aktiv are well known debt purchasers and can be difficult.If you are totally sure these debts are not yours,you need to challenge Aktiv in writing Recorded Delivery stating you have no idea what these debt refer to,

 

See what their reply is then we can guide you through the next step.

 

Removing Defaults ,very difficult unless you are 100% sure these debts are not yours, then you can get them removed and you an call the shots with Aktiv

 

Regards Fs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi welcome to Cag,

If these defaults are properly placed

because of irregularities in the accounts

you would need to have very strong proof

that they are unfair or that the default was

wrongly placed.

You will need to check your credit reference

files.

Aktiv Kapital are a debt purchase company and

they will have aquired accounts that have been

defaulted and sold on to them.

Have Aktiv been in contact in any way with you?

If not you will have to contact them to find out

who the original creditors are.

 

A bank account and a store or credit card have

you any recollection of what these may be??

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info, I had a loan when I was about 18 which be the bank account one but I have never had a credit / store card. Aktiv have never been in contact with me which makes it strange, if I call them will that then reopen the debts if they do turn out to be mine ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not call them keep everything in writting.

Also check the other CRAs Equifax and Call Credit

they may give some clue to the original creditors.

To attempt to remove the defaults you need to

know this.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or is it easier for me to just leave the defaults to disappear next year ? Looking into it I think I know what the one is but looks the balance now is higher than the default balance is this right ?

Do not call them keep everything in writting.

Also check the other CRAs Equifax and Call Credit

they may give some clue to the original creditors.

To attempt to remove the defaults you need to

know this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

quite probably be higher

 

AK will be adding unlawful PENALTY fees' or the OC did

before selling the debts.

 

you might find they will leave it till a couple of months before SB date

 

then try and fleece you.

 

it might be better to await their letters

than to pull anyones tail

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...