Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help Please, this is abusive


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4400 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all and thanks in advance for any enlightment here...

 

I'll try to keep it short. My husband became unemployed on the 8th of May after an argument with his boss /owner of a restaurant & accomodation due to late payment of his salary. He worked there for 16 months and not one month he got payed on time, always days or even a week late.

 

I will not go into details about working 70 hours + a week, never getting a written contract of employment or receiving his payslips as "the Accountant" is always changing or going on holidays.

 

Unfortunately we've reached a point where a single salary has become more than important and not enough to survive, so any delay would cause overdraft, fees for going on reserve a creating a snowball.

 

My husband told the owner he couldn't work if he didn't get paid on time, that it was the only basic thing he was asking for. The owner said that they would all have a nice day off as the money was going to reach my hubby's account at 4.30pm on the 8th.

 

My husband said he wouldn't work until he got paid. (he's not the only one, same with the Sous Chef, waiters, etc), so he and the Sous Chef left that day.

 

he got paid at 5pm that day (counter credit) and the owner came to our home to make him go back and his strategy was threatening with a solicitor. he needed my husband to work because that saturday the restaurant had an important 200 people charity event (catering).

 

Conditions for my husband and Sous Chef to return until Sunday were: to get paid his acquired holiday payment in advance before the tuesday's shift (denied on 2 occassions before), and cash in hand at the end of each shift.

 

They told him they would pay each shift but the holidays on Sunday after service, as they needed assurance from my husband and the money was coming out from the event.

 

All this via emails....my husband felt he couldn't go back, he knew they were not paying him.

 

They called a Chef to pay him !by the hour, and the guy did not get paid !They lied to him.

 

My husband wrote an email 2 days ago asking when could be a suitable time to pick up his belongings (portfolio, books, knives) and his holiday pay. Never got a reply so he went today, and the owner took the knives from the kitchen and put them in his office). he said he was busy and threw my husband out of the restaurant. My husband told him please I need my stuff to work...he said if he needed to call a solicitor and the owner said bring it on...

 

3 Head Chefs have gone before my husband in similar circumstances, but we can't afford to lose holiday pay as we need the money to move home!!!!!

 

A police officer will go to the restaurant with my husband and the Sous Chef to try and collect their stuff.....and the holiday pay???? what do we do? I called ACAS today, they said it could be constructive dismissal, we have bank statements with all the payments/dates, all the emails, and we have to request the holiday pay in written and give them 14 days....

 

Help please

Edited by ysmotek
Editing in some spacing for ease of reading.
Link to post
Share on other sites

This does sound very much like a case of Constructive Dismissal. This, together with the fact that late or non-payment of wages is classed as an 'Unlawful Deduction' under Section 13 of the Employment Rights Act is actionable through an Employment Tribunal.

You need to gather as much evidence as possible (OK - so I know you have statements, emails etc) on paper in chronological order. Who spoke to whom and when, what was said, what was agreed and then didn't happen. This, together with the documents that you have would form the backbone of your case, which is to prove that the employer acted in such a way as to make the employer/employee relationship break down to the point that it became impossible to continue. Try to build in the fact that grievances had been raised previously about the matters which caused distress and the fact that the employer failed to act.

 

ACAS are correct in that you should send a Letter before Action, demanding payment of all sums due, including holiday pay. Give 14 (or even 7) days to make payment then issue an ET1 for the Unlawful Deduction.

 

Try to consult with a solicitor - CAB may be able to recommend one, and if you have home insurance, this often contains legal cover for employment disputes. Constructive Dismissal is not the easiest case to win, hence plenty of evidence and solid, qualified legal advice is almost essential.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ysmotek,

 

Sorry to hear about the way your husband was treated.

 

Certainly how much an employee is paid and when he is paid are express terms of a contract of employment. If an employer breaches an express term this could well equate to a fundamental breach. IF, you can prove you resigned in the face of this fundamental breach then in theory at least you have the basis of a constructive dismissal claim.

 

In your case, I suppose the argument would be that as money became tighter for you their repeated failure to pay on time, had an increasingly severe impact on you and thus whilst you could tolerate the breaches earlier on, lately it became impossible to continue like this.

 

Did you ever submit a formal grievance about this whilst in employment? Hopefully for you, the e-mails you have will serve as the grievance.

 

How much holiday pay are you owed as you should in the very least be able to claim this relatively easily.

 

Che

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

And this post crossed with SW's above ......:wink:

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

This does sound very much like a case of Constructive Dismissal. This, together with the fact that late or non-payment of wages is classed as an 'Unlawful Deduction' under Section 13 of the Employment Rights Act is actionable through an Employment Tribunal.

You need to gather as much evidence as possible (OK - so I know you have statements, emails etc) on paper in chronological order. Who spoke to whom and when, what was said, what was agreed and then didn't happen. This, together with the documents that you have would form the backbone of your case, which is to prove that the employer acted in such a way as to make the employer/employee relationship break down to the point that it became impossible to continue. Try to build in the fact that grievances had been raised previously about the matters which caused distress and the fact that the employer failed to act.

 

ACAS are correct in that you should send a Letter before Action, demanding payment of all sums due, including holiday pay. Give 14 (or even 7) days to make payment then issue an ET1 for the Unlawful Deduction.

 

Try to consult with a solicitor - CAB may be able to recommend one, and if you have home insurance, this often contains legal cover for employment disputes. Constructive Dismissal is not the easiest case to win, hence plenty of evidence and solid, qualified legal advice is almost essential.

 

Hello Sidewinder thanks for your reply. I've been reading a lot before posting and understand the difficulty in constructive dismissal cases. My hope is that showing we have (well, my hubby has) the knowledge it won't go as far as to a legal dispute per se. We went to CAB the same day, and we'll go again. We don't have home insurance but I'll figure something out. Your info was very useful !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ysmotek,

 

Sorry to hear about the way your husband was treated.

 

Certainly how much an employee is paid and when he is paid are express terms of a contract of employment. If an employer breaches an express term this could well equate to a fundamental breach. IF, you can prove you resigned in the face of this fundamental breach then in theory at least you have the basis of a constructive dismissal claim.

 

In your case, I suppose the argument would be that as money became tighter for you their repeated failure to pay on time, had an increasingly severe impact on you and thus whilst you could tolerate the breaches earlier on, lately it became impossible to continue like this.

 

Did you ever submit a formal grievance about this whilst in employment? Hopefully for you, the e-mails you have will serve as the grievance.

 

How much holiday pay are you owed as you should in the very least be able to claim this relatively easily.

 

Che

 

Hello Che, thanks for your reply ! A formal grievance (not a written one) was ever submitted, just endless mouth to mouth complaints. He started as a Sous Chef, after a few months got a cut in salary, he didn't agreed but was scared to lose the job and then promoted as a Head Chef a few months ago. On the conversation about promotion this issue was raised by my husband and they promised to pay on time... HA HA HA

Well Che, good luck with "venceremos" :)

signed: a fellow compatriota (maybe?) :)

ps: oh and the holiday pay could be about £800. is what I heard him say but I'll learn to calculate them and get back to you on this one

Edited by ysmotek
forgot an answer
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again, just an update to say my husband went today to recover his belongings, escorted by a police officer, and the owner was nice and even said he left a message to my husband (HE DID NOT), obviously because the police was there. He entered, took his stuff and on the way out asked the owner about his holiday pay, and the guy said we can't pay you because you'll hear from my solicitor. My husband told him ok you'll hear from mine....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just remember that solicitor or no solicitor it is completely unlawful to withhold wages...

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hola ysmotek,

 

I've been meanig to get back to this but not had time ....

 

In answer to your question, no it is my other half who is the 'compatriota'' - I've decided I'll never pronounce the rrrrr in ropa in quite the same way that she says it!

 

To get back to your problem, how are you funding the solicitor?

 

I ask this because your costs will likely not be recoverable in an ET and it is perfectly possible to draft the ET1 yourself to claim your sums due.

 

I'm a bit rusty these days but I think that despite the fact that you will going (for amongst other things) for a CD claim then you should still consider writing to your employer asking for written reasons for dismissal:

 

Dear Sirs,

 

I have recently been dismissed from your company.

 

I would like to request that you provide me with written reasons for my dismissal. I would remind you that should those provided be inadequate or untrue, you will have failed to comply with your obligations in this respect as outlined in s.92 of ERA 1996

 

If they fail to reply then potentially this adds another 2 weeks pay to your claim.

 

I suppose potentially you have claims for, (1)Unfair (constructive dismissal),(2) Unpaid Holiday Pay, (3) Notice Pay / Wrongful Dismissal [potentially drafted as an unlawful deductions claim] ,(4) if no written contract potential claim for failure to provide and then also potentially (5) the failure to provide written reasons assuming you write the letter as listed above

 

I have got some sample precedents for eavh of the above heads of claim, and these precedents can be amended by you quite easily and inserted in the correct place on the ET1, but if you've got a solicitor free e.g. via some BTE insurance then they will take care of this. Just to ask again, how are you paying the sol?

 

Meanwhile, as mentioned by SW above, you need to be getting your evidence together to support claim 1 above as this will be the hardest to prove. One easy way to look at CD is to think of it as the reverse of a gross misconduct dismissal i.e. GM by the employer made it impossible to continue to work under the contract of employment. Thus, to that extent it will only be your employer's actions PRIOR to your husband walking our that will be relevant. Post termination actions will go to general background only and have no bearing on the legal substance of the CD claim, which as SW rightly says, could well be hard to win.

 

Kind regards

 

Che

Edited by elche
  • Haha 1

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hola ysmotek,

 

I've been meanig to get back to this but not had time ....

 

In answer to your question, no it is my other half who is the 'compatriota'' - I've decided I'll never pronounce the rrrrr in ropa in quite the same way that she says it!

 

To get back to your problem, how are you funding the solicitor?

 

I ask this because your costs will likely not be recoverable in an ET and it is perfectly possible to draft the ET1 yourself to claim your sums due.

 

I'm a bit rusty these days but I think that despite the fact that you will going (for amongst other things) for a CD claim then you should still consider writing to your employer asking for written reasons for dismissal:

 

Dear Sirs,

 

I have recently been dismissed from your company.

 

I would like to request that you provide me with written reasons for my dismissal. I would remind you that should those provided be inadequate or untrue, you will have failed to comply with your obligations in this respect as outlined in s.92 of ERA 1996

 

If they fail to reply then potentially this adds another 2 weeks pay to your claim.

 

I suppose potentially you have claims for, (1)Unfair (constructive dismissal),(2) Unpaid Holiday Pay, (3) Notice Pay / Wrongful Dismissal [potentially drafted as an unlawful deductions claim] ,(4) if no written contract potential claim for failure to provide and then also potentially (5) the failure to provide written reasons assuming you write the letter as listed above

 

I have got some sample precedents for eavh of the above heads of claim, and these precedents can be amended by you quite easily and inserted in the correct place on the ET1, but if you've got a solicitor free e.g. via some BTE insurance then they will take care of this. Just to ask again, how are you paying the sol?

 

Meanwhile, as mentioned by SW above, you need to be getting your evidence together to support claim 1 above as this will be the hardest to prove. One easy way to look at CD is to think of it as the reverse of a gross misconduct dismissal i.e. GM by the employer made it impossible to continue to work under the contract of employment. Thus, to that extent it will only be your employer's actions PRIOR to your husband walking our that will be relevant. Post termination actions will go to general background only and have no bearing on the legal substance of the CD claim, which as SW rightly says, could well be hard to win.

 

Kind regards

 

Che

 

Thanks again Che...

I can't afford a solicitor, so, I am writing the letter (s) myself in a way that looks we are receiving professional advice, which, in a sense, I am. So I am reading this forum and trying to extract bits I can work with. This post has been extremely helpful. I agree it will be hard to pronounce rrrrrrrr the way we do !!!

My regards to other half, and to you for being helpful.....With this forum I've found I am not the only one who had a terrible situation at work, and now my husband as well.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget to have words with HMRC.

 

I will, many thanks borisbeaver

 

I heard today a comment from another local restaurant that my husband's ex employer is avoiding (them) in giving back catering equipment they hired for the event I mentioned on my post, and of course thay have not payed for this equipment. The trainee Chef left and did not finished his notice, and because is a town where voice spreads quickly, they haven't found a Chef yet. The ones around don't want to work for him.......so, I have this feeling that when I send the letter of action, they will claim bankruptcy. They're also avoiding suppliers...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...