Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This time you do need to reply to them with a snotty letter to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did try court. We will help this evening.  
    • Hi, I just wanted to update the post and ask some further advice  I sent the CCA and CPR request on the 14th May, to date I have had no reply to the CCA but I received a load of paperwork from the CPR request a few days ago. I need to file the defence today and from the information I have read the following seems to be what is required.  I would be grateful if some one could confirm suitability. Many thanks   Claim The claim is for the sum of £255.69 due by the Defendant under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a PayPal account with an account reference of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)  The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 15-09-21, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £0.00. The Claimant claims the sum of £255.69   Defence  The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have had financial dealings with PayPal  in the past but cannot recollect the account number referred to by the Claimant. 2. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am not aware of service of a Default Notice by the original creditor the Claimant refers to within its particulars of claim.  3. Paragraph 3 is noted. On the 14/5/2024 I requested information related to this claim by way of a Section 77 request, which was received and signed for by the claimant on 20/5/2024. As of today, the Claimant has failed to respond to this request, and therefore remains in default of the section 77 request and therefore unable to enforce any alleged agreement until its compliance. 4. Therefore it is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and: (b) Show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice Pursuant to s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 5. Paypal (Europe) S.A.R.L is out of the juristriction of English Courts. 6. As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 7. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief.
    • Thanks @dx100ukI followed the advice given on here... then it went very quiet!  The company was creditfix I think then transferred to Knightsbridge (or the other way around) The scammer independent advisor was Roger Wallis-having checked his LinkedIn profile just this morning, it does look like he's still scamming vulnerable people... I know I was stupid for taking his advice, but i do wonder how many others he has done this to over a longer period of time (it came as a  massive shock to him when our IVA suddenly failed). Lowell have our current address (and phone numbers if the rejected calls over the past couple of days is anything to go by!) No point trying the SB because of the correspondence in 2019? Thanks
    • I have received the following letter from BW Legal today.  Also includes form if I admit the debt and wanting my income details.  Do I reply to this LETTER OF CLAIM please?  Looks like they are ready for court now??  Thank You BW Legal - Letter of Claim.pdf
    • According to Wikipedia - yeah, I know - the site is owned by Croydon Council. It's at least worth a try to contact the council and ask for a contact in The Colonnades. You could then lay it on thick about being a genuine customer and ask them to call their dogs off. It's got to be worth a try  https://www.croydon.gov.uk/contact-us/contact-us  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can anyone advise on Muck Hall response please? Thanks!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4406 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Is this correct? I just want rid of them so bad, they have been a huge pain in the ass during my repayment plan

Dear Blossom

Unfortunately Mackenzie Hall will not offer any settlement on your account

 

The interest and the value repayable that Quick Quid charges is clearly stated before the loan is agreed.

We are more than happy to keep you on your current arrangement of £61.33 per month until the balance is paid in full

Your next installment is due by 01/06/2012

Once the account is fully paid your credit file will be updated as Paid in Full

Kind Regards

To whom it may concern,

 

I am writing with regards to a Final Settlement Offer.

 

After making my agreed instalment payment of £62 in June, My offer is that I make no more payments until 31st July 2012. I would then make a final payment on that date of £139 and then ask that my account is closed and the debt is marked as settled in full on my credit file.

 

My calculations are as follows -

 

The original loan was for £400 plus £50 in interest. By July I will have paid £311 from this debt with £139 remaining. The rest (£425) outstanding is purely unlawful interest charges which I have been advised by the Citizens Advice Bureau are unenforceable in any Court Of Law.

 

To clarify, I would ask that you accept my final settlement offer of £139 on or before 31st July 2012, and ensure that it is marked on my credit file as settled in full.

 

Please confirm by return email.

 

Thank you.

 

Blossom

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask them why they are going against OFT guidance which states that they have to take your financial situation into account. Ask them why they are intent on putting you into further hardship when if the case ever went before a court, a judge would more than likely lessen the amount you are paying.

 

Also ask why they arent providing you a breakdown of charges on the account.

  • Confused 1

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I CANNOT believe in this economic climate that they think people have £425 to spare on interest charges. £425!!!!! I think I'm flogging a dead horse with this and they are going to stick to their guns, and my blood is boiling. I only had the confidence to email them and challenge the charges thanks to the people on this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, look at it this way. If i loaned you £100 then a few weeks later i said you now owe me £500 because you werent able to pay it on time and needed an extension of 4 weeks. What would you say to me? It's no different to how the PDL's work. They just try to exploit various loopholes in law to try and justify charging a massive amount for a very tiny amount of credit.

 

It's just sad that the proposed amendmant to change the law so the FSA can clamp down hard on PDL's, is looking like it wont be passed next week in parliament. For some reason, a LOT of MP's are refusing to vote for it, and indeed, the Conservative led goverment was paid/donated a LOT of money by the owner of a group of PDL's last election.

 

If MP's had a grip on reality, you would never see these extortionate charges/interest amounts being added to a short term loan, and people like yourself that took out the loan because you needed to make ends meet would easily be able to repay the loan and get on with your life.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if all hope looks lost, its best to keep a dialogue open. You never know what may happen, plus if it ever dos get to court, you can still contest it in front of a judge. If you lose the case for whatever reason, you'll be in no different of a position than you are now, as the judge will still take into account how much you can afford and when, and the PDL/DCA cannot change the amount of frequency as it has been court ordered.

 

Remember, courts etc are neutral and investigate both sides before making a judgement on the issue.

 

Now im not saying it will get to court, as the PDL might buckle and give you what you want, but its better to give you the full details, to alleviate any stress you may have,.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

... My reply ... Have I shot myself in the foot???? Thanks

 

 

Thanks for your reply,

 

I understand that I defaulted on the loan, and I take full responsiblity for paying back what I borrowed plus the interest. £425 in interest charges is extortionate and, as stated before, unenforceable in a court of law. I have been advised by Citizens Advice Bereau that I am within my rights to challenge these charges, and also as I have never received a breakdown of all the charges I may immediately make a complaint to the Office Of Fair Trading and to Alan Stewart or Sam Gardiner of East Ayrshire Trading Standards. I shall also be sending them copies of my bank statements showing the high amount of bank charges accrued from Quick Quid trying to debit my account after having been informed that there was no money in the account for them to take, and asked not to do so. So on top of the high bank charges I was charged for them trying to raid my account (illegally) £425 in interest on the loan is extremely unfair.

 

I would like to re emphasise that I take responsibilty for paying back the amount borrowed, plus interest. And I have kept to the repayment agreement so far on time.

 

I ask again that you accept my previous offer and put an end to the matter.

 

Please respond by return email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I just accept defeat on this ...? Advice gratefully received ...

Dear Blossom

This is the breakdown of your balance as supplied by Quick Quid:

Original Principle Balance: £400.00

Check Amount: £300.00

Late Fees: £36.00

Total: £736.00

You have paid to us: £249.00

Outstanding Balance: £487.00

I have consulted my management in regards to settlements your account.

It seems you may have been misinformed regarding legal proceedings. We use a companies called Colemans Solicitors and Stirling Park when considering any legal action.

In regards to Settlements:

They will only consider settlement offers of 80% and above

This would mean a minimum payment at this point to close the account would be £389.60

Kind regards

Mackenzie Hall

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blossom

 

I am about to undertake the same route as you are going down. I am going to propose exactly the same (the original loan plus the original 1 month interest) and will let you know how I get on. I have asked for a breakdown and will be emailing them with my offer next week. Don't give up. I note they said to you an i quote;

 

The interest and the value repayable that Quick Quid charges is clearly stated before the loan is agreed.

 

and that is what you are proposing to pay them am i right? The interest and value repayable at the time you accepted the loan, you are disputing the disgusting rollover charges etc etc. I have paid wonga £826 on a £926 loan - they say i still owe them over £1200! Payday UK i borrowed £410, have paid them back £580 and they still want £400 from me

 

Suzyem

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...