Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A local business has been parking on an off-street parking space in front of my garages (in a side street).  I wasn't using them for a while so didnt bother to do anything.  But now a second local business is also using the osp - taking it in turns with the 1st biz.  This has started to nark me.    The employees choose to drive to work.  There is no private parking in their business's street.  But there are some underground secure garages in their street - which cost apx £2.4k/y to rent - which works out apx £6.60/d. (I believe one of the biz owners already rent one for storage purposes).  If the employee had to park on a meter it would cost them £6.60/h - £66 for 10h and have to move every 4h.  They just don't want to pay for parking. I haven't confronted either of them.  Instead I just put 2 clear "no parking" signs in front of the garages. And a note on one of the cars specifically saying that as they don't live or rent in the street and it's private land could they stop parking.   They ignored that.  And just put notes on their dash with a # to call if one needs the car moved.  Theres a sign and they've been told in writing to stop parking. And they are just ignoring it.    I don't what a confrontation.   I don't want to go to the expense of bollards (other than maybe traffic plastic ones - but they'll probs just move them).  Council won't do zilch cos it's private land. And police won't get involved - unless I clamp/ tow the cars and then they'd be after me, not the drivers!   What's the best thing to do?
    • yes might be the best idea. you'd only at best get 8% flat interest and that unusual on a GOGW if this was what it was. simply contact the FOS and let them know its resolved. dx  
    • If you’ve ever wondered how you might fare in armed combat, the first 20 minutes of Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan is likely to make you thank your lucky stars you were born too late to storm the Normandy beaches on June 6 1944. I suspect many of us might be driven to identify with those men who were absolutely turned to stone by fear. And yet these young men, mainly conscripts, screwed their courage to the sticking point and did the job the fate had chosen for them, heroes all.   .. UK PM Sunak perhaps thinks he understands mind numbing fear better than many as he dishonorably fled the beachhead to do nothing more than double down on dishonest spin and lies from the safety of a UK studio .. The Normandy heroes who not only held their positions, but advanced through hell to a victory that changed the entire course of history .. undoubtedly hold a different perspective.     from a perspective in TheConversation     .. 'That was the slot that sunaks team offered for the interview
    • Yes, send a message to the purchaser but keep it very friendly and simply that you noticed that the package has now been delivered.  I suggest that you ask them if they want to keep the package still or if they would rather return it and that if they want to keep it then please will they return your payment to you to your PayPal address. Keep it as polite and friendly as possible and then we will decide what to do if he doesn't reply or refuses.  Meanwhile I will have a look at Google earth and see if you are able to spot the gas meter outside the house to get an idea if the delivery is real. Get a screenshot
    • Santander have sent their final response and have agreed that they were in the wrong. They will be refunding me the amount I am due and £50 for the delay.  Just the interest factor would be more than double the £50 that they are offering. Thinking to just close this and move on. Is this what you would do?  Opened a FOS case on the 1st of June but haven't heard back yet. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

N1 Claim Form received for old Welcome Finance debt


Fars
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4384 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What do you remember about this loan?

Do you have any paperwork?

Did you sign an agreement and if yes, did it comply with the requirements of CCA 1974?

Did you receive a default notice?

Did you receive statements about the account?

 

Look at the information you do have and formulate a response based on that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

As your agreement was made before 6 April 2007, if there were any defects with it, then the court has no power to enforce.

 

Apart from the NoA issue, Default Notice and breach of s 67, there are also the possible defects mentioned:

 

- credit misstated as it included charges for credit;

- failure to give notice of cancellation rights;

- defect in notice of cancellation rights;

 

Did you have PPI by the way?

 

I just checked and see that the date of the claim was the 14th May so you have until next week to formulate a defence so there is no need to panic just yet.

 

I would call the solicitors and ask them if they received your CPR 31.14 request? Also, whether they would consent to an extension for the defence to be filed by "28 days" (CPR 15.5) whilst they respond to your CPR 31.14 request.

 

Advise them that the alternative is an application to be made which would deal with disclosure AND the extension of time and that because they did not comply with pre-action protocol in terms of divulging all the paper work required for the claim, there may be an adverse costs order against them.

 

If they do agree to the extension, ask them to email you their agreement and to send it via snail mail as well.

 

Also state that if you do not get the email by tomorrow 12:00pm, you will be filing an application for their compliance.

 

I am not going to be back online until this evening so if you get stuck, there are enough knowledgeable people here to help you through however right now, you should be contacting the solicitors and making sure they are aware of their obligations.

 

Ps. Forgot to add that the defences mentioned previously may or may not suit your circumstances. It all depends on what you remember, what paperwork you have in your possession and the paper work received from the claimaint, if any.

Edited by hmmh1978
Link to post
Share on other sites

you REALLY must get an sar off to welcome

 

you dont state how much they are after

 

but if yu have PPI or any ins back to the sart in 2005

it'll porb be worth £1000's along with all their PENALTY charges.

 

have you the agreement still?

 

and what was the loan type?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the advice dx

 

you REALLY must get an sar off to welcome

Ok, I can do that, was just worried with it taking up to 2 months to be dealt with that it wouldn't help in my timeframe, if the information arrives after my 28 days are up (early next week) what do I do then?

 

you dont state how much they are after

Ah sorry, the amount was hidden away in post 4, it is around £2700

 

but if yu have PPI or any ins back to the sart in 2005

it'll porb be worth £1000's along with all their PENALTY charges.

I did have ppi, I was told they wouldn't give me the loan without it at the time. The loan was £2000ish and the insurance was £400ish

 

have you the agreement still?

Yes

 

and what was the loan type?

It was a personal loan

 

dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the advice hmmh,

 

As your agreement was made before 6 April 2007, if there were any defects with it, then the court has no power to enforce.

Not sure how I can check for defects, I have the original sat here infront of me, any advice on checking this?

 

Apart from the NoA issue, Default Notice and breach of s 67, there are also the possible defects mentioned:

 

- credit misstated as it included charges for credit;

- failure to give notice of cancellation rights;

- defect in notice of cancellation rights;

Ok, that all sounds interesting.

 

Did you have PPI by the way?

Yes

 

I just checked and see that the date of the claim was the 14th May so you have until next week to formulate a defence so there is no need to panic just yet.

I think it works out as this Saturday if we don't include bank holidays/jubilee etc, and next week if we do.

 

I would call the solicitors and ask them if they received your CPR 31.14 request? Also, whether they would consent to an extension for the defence to be filed by "28 days" (CPR 15.5) whilst they respond to your CPR 31.14 request.

 

Advise them that the alternative is an application to be made which would deal with disclosure AND the extension of time and that because they did not comply with pre-action protocol in terms of divulging all the paper work required for the claim, there may be an adverse costs order against them.

 

If they do agree to the extension, ask them to email you their agreement and to send it via snail mail as well.

 

Also state that if you do not get the email by tomorrow 12:00pm, you will be filing an application for their compliance.

 

The problem is that the solicitors listed on the claim form aren't really solicitors at all, but rather an in house department for IND, the chasing DCA. So when you call the phone number on the claim form for the solicitors you get IND answering and not offering any help.

 

I am not going to be back online until this evening so if you get stuck, there are enough knowledgeable people here to help you through however right now, you should be contacting the solicitors and making sure they are aware of their obligations.

 

Ps. Forgot to add that the defences mentioned previously may or may not suit your circumstances. It all depends on what you remember, what paperwork you have in your possession and the paper work received from the claimaint, if any.

Ok, thanks for that. I remember pretty much everything I'd say, I have all of the paperwork, from agreement to ppi insurance pack, only paperwork IND have ever sent me was the letter 2 weeks before the claim notice arrived.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you scan up the agreement please

and i'll see what i can do with a PPI spready for you.

 

 

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

.

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc barcodes etc using paint program

but leave all figures and dates.

.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

.

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, done. Hopefully this is good enough to be useful. If any areas need more detail I can provide that.

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]35840[/ATTACH]

 

Should also point out that it appears the credit agreement was never infact signed by either myself or welcome. Not sure if this changes anything.

Edited by Fars
Link to post
Share on other sites

is this the ONLY loan you ever had ?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How did you make application on this loan FARs? The lack of signatures and execution could signify a reconstituted version?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I called up the local office and applied over the phone as far as I remember. They sent me the documents and then a few days later the loan was in my bank account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I called up the local office and applied over the phone as far as I remember. They sent me the documents and then a few days later the loan was in my bank account.

 

Original agreement or by a section 77 request?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

All of my documentation is original from 2005. So original agreement.

 

Section 77 request I sent off on 22/05/2012 is still unanswered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you retained the original Default Notice might as well check that out also?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still not entirely sure what a default notice is. I'm assuming it is the letter I received on 26/04/2012 saying last letter before legal proceedings.

 

If that is it, the only information it has is an account statement saying the amount and an odd date of 02/12/2011 as the default date.

 

edit/

 

Ah just reread your post Andy. No I don't have an original default notice from welcome or anyone prior to IND taking over this debt, I have kept every other document i've recieved but don't appear to have that. So I am assuming it was never received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DN would have been issued in 2006 when you agreed a payment plan of £1pm.

 

There is no reference to it in the P.O.C no default date no agreement date.

 

 

"The Claimant claims for sums due under a/various Credit Agreement(s) related only to money regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 entered into between the Claimant and the Defendant. The agreement(s) was/were terminated upon the Defendant failure to comply with the terms of Agreement(s). The Claimant complied with Section III and IV and Annex B of the PD Pre-Action Conduct. And the Claimant Claims: Personal Loan Account number XXXXXXXX balance of 2.700 as of 2/12/11. interest under the s69 of the county court Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 2/12/11 to 10/5/12 of 94 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of 0.59 AND Costs"

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it cant be validated or sure if one was ever issued.To commence legal proceedings a DN must be issued.They have not even proved that they are the legal owner yet by way of assignment.

Perhaps wait until hmmh is on line to offer further advice but from what I see its impossible to draft a partularised defence based on the claimants pleadings.

 

Also impossible to agree extension CPR 15.5 with an answerphone.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, thanks for the clarification Andy.

 

I'm guessing when they purchased this debt from Welcome I should have received notification, which would have been the assignment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets refute the P.o.C as it stands:-

 

 

"The Claimant claims for sums due under a/various Credit Agreement(s)

What agreement/s they have failed to respond to your section 77 request and therefore will shortly be in default

 

related only to money regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 entered into between the Claimant and the Defendant.

Not true you have never entered into an agreement with the Claimant and they have yet to disclose a valid NoA.

 

The agreement(s) was/were terminated upon the Defendant failure to comply with the terms of Agreement(s)

.When, what date what was the breach?Proof that a DN was issued and subsequent Arrears Notices issued since?

 

The Claimant complied with Section III and IV and Annex B of the PD Pre-Action Conduct.

How in what way A LBA dated 26th April 2012?

 

And the Claimant Claims: Personal Loan Account number XXXXXXXX balance of 2.700 as of 2/12/11. interest under the s69 of the county court Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from

2/12/11 to 10/5/12 this is the assignment date?

 

of 94 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of 0.59 AND Costs"

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

ta

 

153.21*24=3677.04

 

total for PPI = 684.34

total for loan=3677.04

 

total for PPI /Total for loan * 100 = 18.6%

 

18.6% of £153.21 = £28.52 PPI PCM

 

think this is correct:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

we need those PENALTY charges too, bet they owe YOU!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

we need those PENALTY charges too, bet they owe YOU!!

 

dx

 

 

Absolutely DX time permitting.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

we need those PENALTY charges too, bet they owe YOU!!

 

dx

 

I'm assuming the only way to get that information is with a SAR to Welcome though?

 

 

 

ta

 

153.21*24=3677.04

 

total for PPI = 684.34

total for loan=3677.04

 

total for PPI /Total for loan * 100 = 18.6%

 

18.6% of £153.21 = £28.52 PPI PCM

 

think this is correct:

 

 

 

we need those PENALTY charges too, bet they owe YOU!!

 

dx

 

Thanks for looking at the numbers dx, this side of things confuses me further however.

 

If the loan was £2000, ppi £450 and they're asking for £2700 then isn't the maximum the amount could be reduced by £700 odd?

 

How could they owe me money if charges only make up around £250?

 

Sorry for all the questions, just finding this so difficult :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets refute the p.o.c as it stands:-snip

 

Thank you very much for that Andy, this has really helped me understand what they are saying and what they actually have. Is there any benefit to entering a defence based upon these questions and statement in my own words?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...