Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
    • I think you need to tell us what actually happened. Your original post gives the impression that you were taken to court for a speeding offence. But you go on to say that you received no paperwork. So you could not have been summonsed for a speeding offence because the police had no evidence that you (or anybody else) was driving (and it seems you were not anyway). You were probably summonsed (or more likely received a Single Justice Procedure Notice) for "failing to provide the driver's details." You would not normally be banned for this offence if you were convicted - it carries six points. So did you have any earlier points which meant you were liable to a "totting up" ban?  If you were originally convicted (as it seems you might have been) how was that conviction set aside? Did you perform a Statutory Declaration? There is simply too much missing for any meaningful help to be given. It seems as if there may have been an error by the DVLA but before you consider suing those idiots until the cows come home, you need to explain exactly what has happened.  
    • Point 4 and 10 duplicate Point 5 and 8 duplicate  Try to keep to one para with regards the agreement...various paras duplicating the same. Statement of truth is out of date refer to the claimants statement    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Been paying DLC for 5yrs on old Abbey Card 'debt' - NO CCA!


salbee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3483 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

further to my last

- I received a letter today (addressed solely to me - why??) from DLC

stating the letter I sent to MDB was passed to them.

 

 

They state whilst they are not able to provide a copy of the T&C's I am still "liable for payment of the monies originally borrowed.

 

 

Please note that a request for account documentation is not to prove a properly executed agreement exists

but is to provide customers with information about the account.

 

 

We have provided a copy of the agreement you signed in November 2001 to assist you."

 

They then go on to say statements from Abbey & themselves were provided and show payments over the last 11 years

"so we question why you claim you do not acknowledge the debt".

 

 

They also say regarding a Doorstop Specialist

- "should one be appointed, they would give you reasonable notice of the timing of any intended visit, which is all that is required."

 

They then request that I contact MDB to discuss repayment options available to me

& if I am in financial hardship to have to hand monthly I&E so an apt payment plan can be agreed.

 

I am at a loss what to do.

:-(

Edited by salbee
typos
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 208
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If the Ts & Cs are not supplied with a recon agreement then the recon has no merit.

 

Sounds to me that they know they can't enforce this otherwise there wouldbe threats of court action, not a visit from a doorstepping dimwit.

 

Personally I would say you cannot agree to make any payment as the Ts &Cs are unavailable so the debt remains in dispute and liability is denied.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just look to CAG, help is never far away,enjoy the weekend!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

further to my last - I received a letter today (addressed solely to me - why??) from DLC stating the letter I sent to MDB was passed to them. They state whilst they are not able to provide a copy of the T&C's I am still "liable for payment of the monies originally borrowed. Please note that a request for account documentation is not to prove a properly executed agreement exists but is to provide customers with information about the account. We have provided a copy of the agreement you signed in November 2001 to assist you."

They then go on to say statements from Abbey & themselves were provided and show payments over the last 11 years "so we question why you claim you do not acknowledge the debt". They also say regarding a Doorstop Specialist - "should one be appointed, they would give you reasonable notice of the timing of any intended visit, which is all that is required."

They then request that I contact MDB to discuss repayment options available to me & if I am in financial hardship to have to hand monthly I&E so an apt payment plan can be agreed.

 

I am at a loss what to do.

:-(

 

What a lot of rubbish.

 

1: They havent provided anything to "assist" you - they have provided (or not) information that you are legally entitled to in order to establish if your rights under the CCA1974 have been denied you.

 

2: They can give you all the notice they want - but unless you agree to a visit, they have no right to turn up on your doorstep. Should they be foolish to do this, then just ask them to remove themselves from your property. Do not let them in for any reason. If they want the bathroom, direct them to the local public facility. If they want to use your phone, direct them to the nearest public phone booth.

 

You were entitled to receive for your CCA request..

 

A copy or truthful reconstruct of the original document

terms and conditions at both inception and default or current and if any variations, then copies of those as well.

Plus a statement of account which shows the balance outstanding and any default charges.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi again

- it has been some time since my last post regarding DLC and a lot has changed since then.

We heard nothing from them for months and in the meantime moved counties and forgot about them.

 

 

They have started to contact us again (well, my husband) and

I guess got our info from the electoral roll.

They are asking him to contact them to arrange payment of the outstanding debt.

 

a quick summary so you don't have to go back through this thread:

 

original loan with abbey national, debt cancelled by them in 2008.

DLC (Hillesden) contacted us "on behalf of abbey national" and

said they were taking over the collection of the debt.

 

We had not been told this by AN but believed them and continued to pay them for the next 5 years (until I found the CAG).

 

Before I got wise they used threats on a regular basis and our repayments just kept on going up and up.

 

in 2013 we received a letter from Santander stating the debt was sold to Hillesden in Nov 2007

.

We had no such letter prior to this, and this wasn't mentioned on the debt cancellation document

 

however we were with Payplan for a couple of years so it could've gone straight to them.

 

Payplan claimed they had 'lost' our file some years ago.

 

We have submitted a SAR, CCA request (in 2012), harassment letter etc.

 

No CCA has been provided so far by the DCA.

 

They acknowledge this but state the debt remains owing either way.

 

I am getting really fed up with this lot.

The o/s debt is approx 6K,

they have already had over 5K from us prior to help from this forum.

What do we do next (nothing?)

 

We have moved in the last 2 weeks to a new rental and have yet to register our new address on the electoral roll.

 

Any advice most gratefully received as ever.

 

S x.

 

 

p.s. We tried to get a mortgage recently having paid off all our debts (bar this one)

and having a lump sum from my husband retiring from the forces.

 

 

The DLC debt did not appear on Experian or Noddle and we were cleared for a mortgage

until the lender decided they didn't like my husband's zero hours contract.

 

 

Could this have triggered new interest in us from DLC?

I haven't paid a penny to them for 18 months and for 10 months prior to that only a pound a month.

 

Of course my instinct is to ignore the latest letter but my husband is really worried.

 

 

He never really got involved in our finances when he was in the forces but

now he's opening his own mail he's really shocked by this.

I have tried to placate him but it's not working!! :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

 

It's not just the electoral roll but a number of factors, your Credit Reference Report is updated by both the Bank & Insurers when you notify them of a change of your address.

Applying for/ changing address for phone/broadband (depending on your provider) can also appear on your CRA File.

 

Also, the CRA's offer the DCA's (for a fee) a facility where a marker will be placed on your CRA File and as soon as this is updated, the CRA will notify the DCA.

 

For now, sit tight as you have just moved (let sleeping dogs lie so to speak), when DLC write again at your new address asking for payment then write to them reminding them no CCA, no pay.

 

Please tell your husband never to worry over any DCA, the worry in the end could easily lead to arguments so please sit him down and show him around various threads on this site to put his mind at ease.

 

Stigman

  • Confused 1

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simple - changing your address does not change anything to do with this debt. So if you decided not to pay for the last 18 months then carry on with the decision.

 

AS Stig states - you need to chat calmly with OH and introduce him to the wonders of CAG. I am sure he will see the light and stop being concerned about this.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...