Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • don't get too hung up on the real meaning of 'fake' in terms of the documents a claimant might produce relating to a potential court claim. by fake we typically mean, they are not obviously the 'real McCoy' ,100% associated with whatever credit they are trying to pin on punters. they are often of the right 'version' that an OC would have used for that particular take out date, but with details inserted in a diff font where they should be for say your name address DOB etc. All DCA's typically  have filing cabinets covering each year for most creditor, whip 'em out, scan and copy n paste your details onto them, even easier now with online sign ups. no hard copies ever sent cause 90% of mugs have lost them..... one of our most powerful tools is the fact any docs they produce, unless they state they are 'a reconstruction'  MUST come from the original creditor noty some hidden pile the claimants have. Link are absolute masters at this so dont stick to lowell threads. dx    
    • Driving home last night I contacted wing mirrors with a car coming the opposite way. The wing mirror folded in and the glass popped out. Very minor damage.  I stopped at the next layby (A road) to repair the mirror. A passerby stopped and said they saw the other car stopped behind me in another layby - they went back and passed over details so we could get in touch.  The conversation started cordially, but quickly got heated when I said I was well on my side and they drifted over (which is what happened).  I wasn't going to bother filing a claim as there isn't enough damage to justify it. So I've said to the other party lets just call it quits as there are no witnesses and we both think we are innocent.   they said they are contacting the police and insurance and that they have witnesses. But a quick facebook search found a post by the other person saying they were in a crash, and were 'spun' off the road. Picture of a broken wing mirror and a slight scuff on the front and rear wheel arch. they are asking for witnesses. I have screenshots of the post, and sent them another message saying I can see you dont have witnesses as you are appealing for them. I'd really not drag this out. Lets call it quits and move on. this was followed by a couple of messages that didn't really make much sense. e.g. 'do the right thing'. What should I do now?  Contact police?  Contact my insurance? - Can I tell them about this incident but say I dont want to claim? Will that affect my premium?  
    • So this is the crux of the argument. The scrappage contribution should have also been counted as a deposit. It was literally a part exchange in return for a cash deduction so there is no reason it wouldn't be treated the same way.  I did not request a VT, I was struggling to pay after a separation from my partner at the time. However had the figures been reflected correctly, the VT cost would have been 2k not 9k and I may have considered it as an option. Instead, the car was marked stolen and removed from my possession by the police
    • LOL - old one the fiver theory - although with the poops its take a fiver now, promise 10p  sometime in the future while claiming the reverse theory   So when is jenrick, an apparent slam dunk as referenced higher in the thread, being referred to the police? These poops need to know that anything they throw will be returned .. with interest  
    • Yup, it isn't a criminal case, it's hard to prove, but take a detailed look at my thread to see how many holes there are in what they have sent me, there is a picture building.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

restons/mbna claimform - now CCJ+CO - set aside?


jcbkabs
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4461 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all i sent a section 78 to mbna in feb 2009 they finally replied in feb 2011 but my question is if the account is in dispute can it be passed to a third party or issue a default and can they take legal action while it's in dispute?

 

 

can you let me have the section of the cca that states they can't

 

 

i was was trying to find out if i had paid any ppi and tick the box on the form so sent it to them in feb 09,they replyed in jan 2011. they said it is not easily readable (which i agree) and they would supply a readable copy still waiting in feb i recieved a court summons but only by accident they had changed my address from a house name to a number which i had not informed them about. had a letter off restons giving a date for court on the morning of court went told juge correct address but the court carried on sending letters to the incorrect address and so did the court then i received another letter just before xmas saying it was in court sent solicitor to that as i was not able to attened now received a warrant of exicution so looking to file a n244 form but need help filling it out have the letters i sent to mbna before the refured it to restons. also sent them a sar request but thay didn't include a copy of the default in with this nor any of the letters i have sent them.

i'm self employed and suffer from depression just got over a bout of it don't want it back

 

as judge awarded a charging order and £2000 in cost when account went into dispute i owed less than £2000

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi all i sent a section 78 to mbna in feb 2009 they finally replied in feb 2011 bow my question is if the account is in dispute can it be passed to a third party or issue a default and can they take legal action while it's in dispute?

 

 

can you let me have the section of the cca that states they can't ?

 

 

i was was trying to find out if i had paid any ppi and tick the box on the form so sent it to them in feb 09,they replyed in jan 2011. They said it is not easily readable (which i agree) and they would supply a readable copy still waiting in feb i recieved a court summons but only by accident they had changed my address from a house name to a number which i had not informed them about. had a letter off restons giving a date for court on the morning of court went told juge correct address but the court carried on sending letters to the incorrect address now received a warrant of exicution so looking to file a n244 form but need help filling it out have the letters i sent to mbna before the refured it to restons. also sent them a sar request but thay didn't include a copy of the default in with this nor any of the letters i have sent them or they have sent me there is about £450 in charges, and given in the the court after the hearing include a list of telephone calls but not all of them. the date they say in their court papers the default notice was issued is different to the one i received

I stopped paying because i broke my foot and being self employed didn't have any money coming in was off work 10 weeks but still having trouble with it as we were able to manage to py our mortage and council tax which we kept up to date. The judge awarded £2000 in cost when account went into dispute i owed less than £2000

an he also granted a charging order

i suffer from depression and stutter when standing in front of people to talk

if this is all jumbled sorry

thanks

Edited by jcbkabs
Link to post
Share on other sites

They can legally do all of those things notwithstanding that the account is in dispute (I'm not saying that it's good practice just that it is not unlawful). Otherwise we'd all put accounts in dispute for frivolous reasons and the creditor could do nothing about it!

 

EDIT: The judge awarded £2,000 of costs on a charging order application?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

how should i apporach this pay it all up or file a n244 form as i think the have deceived the courts by changing my address while knowing i still live at the address they changed it from hoping not for me to put up a fight

Link to post
Share on other sites

how should i apporach this pay it all up or file a n244 form as i think the have deceived the courts by changing my address while knowing i still live at the address they changed it from hoping not for me to put up a fight

 

 

 

I wouldn't focus too much energy arguing about the address as at the end of the day you still received all the documents!

 

I'm concerned about the £2k costs for a charging order (CO). CO costs are a fixed fee of around £215.00.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume its £2k for the whole claim Ganny.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all i sent a section 78 to mbna in feb 2009 they finally replied in feb 2011... i was was trying to find out if i had paid any ppi and tick the box on the form so sent it to them in feb 09,they replyed in jan 2011...in feb i recieved a court summons... had a letter off restons giving a date for court on the morning of court went... now received a warrant of exicution... the default notice was issued is different to the one i received

 

I stopped paying because i broke my foot

 

It seems that you have, by accident or design, received everything. Did you file a defence to the claim? In any event you appear to have attended the relevant hearings.

 

The fact you broke your foot, although unfortunate, is not a valid legal reason to stop paying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes sent it back with wrong address but didn't have any thing back off the court had a letter off restons the morning of the first court hearing, went made judge aware of correct address still no letters off court then i get a of land register to tell me that on there has been an application for a charging order on my home slight problem there my i signed a prenup there with the with back in 1997 when we got married i only get 1% of the family home she gets 99% if we split so would they be able to force me to sell my 1% its currently in neg ative ecuity by about £30000.

does not seem fair how the don't follow the rules yet the use them to make you follow them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back in 1997 when we got married i only get 1% of the family home she gets 99% if we split so would they be able to force me to sell my 1% its currently in neg ative ecuity by about £30000.

No, they won't force you to sell regardless! Just because you have a CO on your property doesn't mean you have to sell it or it will be repossessed. A CO is a way of securing an unsecured debt and, while they are all too easy to obtain, Orders for Sale, which is what's required to force you to sell, are very rare! In fact, they are hardly ever granted for consumer debt under £25k. If the debt is yours and the property is jointly owned all they can register is a restriction. Even with a full CO the'd never get an Order for Sale for £3k.

Link to post
Share on other sites

looking to get it set aside due to them changing my address to an address i have never lived so think this was to try and get the ccj with out me defending but i think this could be treated as fraud. at also they have not responed fully to the SAR there is not a copy of the default notice in there have also sent a complaint to the financial ombusiman as it took mbna over 12 months to responed to my section 77/78 request the they amitted it was not readable and would send out a readable copy still waiting

Link to post
Share on other sites

But, as has already been said, whether by accident or design you actually received the notices of hearings and attended court. I think you would struggle,particularly after all this time that you've done nothing, to have the judgment set aside on the basis of the reasons given.

 

At the end of the day, if you had received more paperwork/the paperwork you receive had been addressed properly what actual difference would that have made?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I signed a prenup there with the with back in 1997 when we got married i only get 1% of the family home she gets 99% if we split

 

what actually was this 'prenup'? was it a formal declaration of trust or did you and your ex wife just agree this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i've been suffering from depression i get good days and bad the last few months have been mainly bad so bad even thought about the unthinkable £2000 in costs is excesive so they are allowed to lie in court and get away with it need to deal with it while i'm on a high just incase i fall back in to the black days

Link to post
Share on other sites

as to the prenup that was done before we were married in 1997 the wife getts 99% of any main residance i get 1% after any mortage is paid by with land registary it shows equal stake this was done so we could get the mortage on this house in 2007 but prenup still in force. we are still married she has helped me so much by draging me to the doctors and makes sure i take my tablets every day at the same time every day with out fail along with introducing a routine back into my life i use to be so active since i broke my foot i cant ride my bike stand to watch my boys play rugby use ladders and still walk with a limp i've gone from having saving and 3 holidays a year to no savings and worrying if we can make our mortage and council tax bill electric and gas all paid and up to date at the moment

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...