Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OpenAI and Reddit reach deal that will give ChatGPT access to content on the social media platform.View the full article
    • Even if that was not a PCN on your car, can you still swear that a PCN was not placed on your car ? NO Even if they showed you a copy of the PCN they sent, can you still wear that they actually sent the first PCN to you? NO Why are still quibbling  when the real argument is why they have broken the Act by telling you that you hadn't paid when in reality they shouldn't have sent that letter out probably until Monday which  would have been deemed received  on Wednesday? If you are that bothered about it, just leave out the start about the windscreen ticket since it isn't why you are complaining.
    • I am sorry that you have come across excel -possibly the most inhumane of all the rogues that ruin parking in private car parks. i am more sorry that I have missed your thread until now. As I understand it, their artic. was parked in front of their parking sign and the Blue badge places forcing you to stop somewhere else in the car park to observe the rules. On realising that even the Blue badge places were paid places and that you did not have the correct coinage you quite rightly decided to leave. Thus you had read their terms and until you have read them and signified your acceptance by either paying or staying, you are not classed as being parked.  You have a MINiMUM of five minutes  leave. Sadly Excel do not understand any words greater than two syllables which is where their problems start. Their greed, ignorance, inhumanity, etc etc all carry on from there. However they do know that Judges do understand what minimum means and are well aware of the Equality Act  so I wouldn't be too worried about what excel  will do. Plus we still have to see their PCN and when it comes to producing a Notice that complies with the Act relating to private car parks they do not excel at that. I hope that the Iceland MD will cancel the ticket. You still have a couple of other routes you could try. The first one is your Member of Parliament will probably be happy to help as they will need all the votes they can get with an election looming. Plus your local newspaper may also pitch in after hearing your story to go after Iceland and excel. [You may notice I have not merite them with a capital E as it is definitely undeserved.]
    • i would focus on a stupid youthful act. ...a waste of time... so what.. it's worked before. when is your hearing? dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Are Link Financial outsourcing scarmongering me?


ninoraisys
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4397 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello to all

 

I have recieved a letter form link financial outsourcing this week over my outstanding student loan.

i have had no contact with anyone ove the loan in almost 5 years due to my dire financail situation and i have been constantly moving around.

 

The letter states that i must pay the full amount of almost £7k in full imediatley or face litigation.

 

i called them staright away and told them and told them of my current situation which is that i am on jobseekers allowance,

i have no savings and am currently living of the graces of my girlfriend while i look for full time work.

 

i asked if there was anyway i could set up a payment plan as there is no way i could pay the full amount.

their response was no and that i had 21 days to come up with the money they suggested i try borrowing the money from family or friends as this is what other people have done.

what would do they live in where people have £7 to spare to loan someone.

 

after a sleepless night and talk to my girlfriend

i called tham back the next day to reitterate that i dont know how to get the full amonut to them.

i also asked if i could pay them £1k now (which my girlfriend was able to scatch together for me to borrow) to show that i do want to get this resolved.

and they still refused saying paying that money now is fine but i was still expected to pay the rest in 21days.

i asked what would happen if i couldn't and they told me it would go to litigation.

 

i said but im trying to come to arrange ment and surely going to court is going to cost you more money, they said quite blunty that i would have to pay all legal fees.

 

so my quetion is are Link being unreasonable when i can prove my financial situation cannot allow me to pay this in full and i am willing to pay 15% of the debt now

and set up a payment plan for the rest?

 

i really fell like they are scare mongerng me into taking on another debt like a loan to pay thid one.

 

Any advice would be appreciated, thanks......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stay off the phone

These clowns are nothing but immature fools.

They bully and intimidate you on the phone and come out with all sorts of garbage in an attempt to frighten people into paying money they don't owe. I am very very pleased they didn't take that grand off you, more fool them, but it goes in your favour.

 

When did you take this loan out?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the student loan was started in 1994-1998 when i was in uni. started derments but over they years i moved around alot and forgot about it then was scared about calling them to (foolishly) just started to get my self back on track starting a new job in the next 2 months and i am meking good on the other debts i have incurred over the years. but link are not helping at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have never made a payment to anyone on this loan. there is another loan account at the same time that i have made payments on in the last 6 years but i spoke the the student loans company and have deferred until november on that. but yeah the one link is chasing i have paid nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if its pre 98 which it is

it will be statute barred

 

end of!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are trying to fleece you

sadly thats how link make 90% of their money

 

 

you owe nowt

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't be at all surprised if they come back with some random fictitious payment you didn't make to reset the the clock...

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

typically march 2007

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi guys

so i have finally got a reply back from Link today. and yes they have put that the last payment credited to the account was on 15 march 2007 to the amount of £119.87. i have checked my account and no money was paid out to that amount on that date or any date. they have also attached a deferment form i filled in on 26-09-2006 and sent to them which stated i was jobseekers and had also recieved £700 personal loan they have said that this was incomplete as the letter my brother signed saying how much cash he had given me was not dated.

so am i back to square one where i have to pay this money and before i contact them again can they refuse to set up a payment plan as i have offered before which was to pay £1000 up front and a payment plan for the rest?

 

 

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not be conned into paying anything, they are the ones who are committing a criminal offence of fraud here, it is SB, end of, you have told them so, they have come back with a fabricated figment of their imagination to con you into thinking it isn't SB, it is, ignore them, or write back to them with all the dates you will be available to attend court and show the judge your watertight defence, then hit them for damages.

 

I would love to knock up one of my flippant responses to them for you, but I need to brush my teeth and get to the dentist for three, but in a nutshell, their letter is written evidence that they intend to commit fraud, thank them for it, and say you will only be too happy to produce this evidence to him when you submit your defence if they ever scrape enough funds together to progress to court, idiots idiots idiots, childish foolish idiots.!!!

 

You MUST make a formal complaint to the OFT&TS via http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Dl1/Directories/UsefulContactsByCategory/Governmentcitizensandrightscontacts/DG_195948

Keep a copy of that letter safe.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hehe..... why do link ALWAYS say a 'phantom' payment was made in march 2007!!?!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

You do not have to pay them anything.

 

If it is more than 6 years ago tell them to go to hell and do not speak to them on the phone.

 

Get the CAB to send them a statute barred letter and even if it is not,

they legally cannot force you to pay any more than you can comfortably afford.

 

It is also a none priority debt and if it is a student loan you should have it deferred or written off.

 

if they take you to court, let them and tell the court the full story.

 

Tell them your circumstances and you will find the court will sympathize and you can fill a form in and offer them £1.00 a month and they have to accept it.

 

You could even get it written off and make sure they show you all the statements and the original agreements.

 

In any event if it is that old, there is nothing they can do!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all.

 

i really dont think i can go down the statue barred path as their is definatly a payment made from my account 5 1/2 years ago. i wrote asking if it was possible to make arrangement and explained my financial situation again and this is what they sent me:

 

This letter is final notification thatany agreement you had to repay your debt has been cancelled for non payment.

without further reference to you we will be immediately recovery of the full sum £6934.32 by one of the following options. you will be held liable for any and all costs associated with collection:

1. your data may be passed to our internalreview investigation department

2.your account may be approved for recovery by way of a judgement secured in your local county court

3. this debt may be transferred to an external frr charging debt collection agent who may call at your home

we are extremely disappointed that we have not been able to resolve this amicably with you. As always our team of account officers remain on call to take your call blah blah blah.........

 

so how should i reply to this. and whats the likelyhood of them passing this to a baliff?

 

help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

So 6 months to go before SB and you wrote offering to make arrangement to pay.

 

Does this reset the SB clock?

 

May have been best to let them go through their motions of investigating and received more advice that surely

would have been on its way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what part of ignore did you not understand...

 

sorry but you appear NOT to be understanding things.

 

where has this bailiff come from?

 

no dca nor doorstepper are bailliffs and never ever will be!

 

you've fallen for the oldest trick in the book that link pull

 

cleverly well worded letters

 

if.may.might.could,instructed.............FLEECED!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What happens next depends on a variety of factors, including your present financial circumstances.

 

But I can tell you now: these are debt collectors and not bailiffs and they can do nothing without it first having a hearing that you attend in court,

but you do not want it to go that far if you can avoid it .

 

You are unsure about this debt so get more information.

 

DO NOT CALL THEM DO IT ALL IN WRITING AND DO NOT GET LEGAL HELP FROM THIS SITE,

GO TO SOMEONE LOCAL AND INDEPENDENT LIKE THE CAB DEBT SPECIALISTS OR THE CLS ON THE PHONE OR NATIONAL DEBT PEOPLE.

 

A JUDGEMENT CAN ONLY BE GOT IN YOUR LOCAL COUNTY COURT IF THE JUDGE IN THE CASE THINKS THEIR CASE HAS MERIT AND YOU HAVE THE MONEY TO PAY IT.

 

IF YOU DO NOT ATTEND THE HEARING THEY WILL GET A JUDGEMENT BY DEFAULT SO IT IS ADVISED

THAT WHEN THE PAPERS COME THAT YOU FIRST OF ALL TICK THE PART THAT SAYS YOU INTEND TO DEFEND

THE CLAIM AND ASKS FOR EXTRA TIME AND THAT GIVES YOU AN EXTRA TWO WEEKS.

 

Take the letter that you have now to someone to respond for you and ask them to get more information about the loan.

 

The first thing to do is always to ask for more information, statements and a full explanation and tell them you are not sure what they are talking about.

This at least will gain more time.

 

Take the information that you get to the people that you get to represent you and let them take it from there.

If you do owe the money; you should not have to pay it all at once;

you should be able to make them or any other lender an offer, even if it is only £1.00 a week.

 

If you are on a low income or benefits then you may be able to get legal assistance to pay for your costs and that includes if you go to small claims court.

Take your representative with you or someone for moral support and tell the court you cannot afford to pay it all at once.

The court has an obligation to take your personal circumstances into consideration and if you go to the CAB they will do an income and expenditure form to send off to these goons.

 

They do not have the authority to pass it on to a bailiff.

It is a loan that is not secured on your property and it is also a loan that is not likely to be.

It is also a none priority loan which means that you have other things to pay first: gas, electric, council tax, TV licence, phone and mortgage

and to eat as well and you are allowed certain other things and the goons get a bit of what is left on a pro rata basis

meaning that they get a small bit of what is left if you owe other people money.

 

To get any of the things above, there needs to be a judgement and you need to have not filled the judgement.

That is how I understand it but I may be wrong, so get proper advice first.

 

However, they should have to go to court first and have some sort of hearing.

 

I have heard that they do fast track things through Lambert court, but they should only hear the case in your local court so make sure that is the case and it is moved here.

They can get it put on your property if you own a house, but that is normally a last resort and you will not have to repay it until the house is sold.

You should also have a hearing about this. This however, need not happen and will be a long time off,if you get help now.

 

The first thing to recall is they are debt collectors and power = O

The courts have to be involved before any of the things that they claim and there is a long process before that happens.

You should ask for more time in writing and full explanation and play daft about the loan.

You want statements and more information and then you can follow on from there.

 

On their website is a complaint form and an email.

Fill it out and get them to contact you in writing and tell them you are going to the CAB and they will only contact you through them.

The CAB will fill out an I and E form and will take it a step at a time and they will send them the details and authority to act.

 

If you cannot make them an offer then hard luck;

they may have to consider writing it off and there are other things that the CAB can do as well, so stop worrying and go and see an expert.

 

That is the best advice.

They do not have the authority to pass it on to a bailiff and you have a complaint if they do.

 

Good luck

 

 

C

Link to post
Share on other sites

bit OTT!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...