Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Some advice please on brighthouse practice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4472 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:|HI all

 

firstly i apologise if my question has been answerd on a previous thread, i have looked but did not find it.

 

i currently have a tv through brighthouse which next month i will be 2 years into the agreement so clearly paid mpore than a third off.

ill be ahonest here im not the best payer in the world and frequently miss payments but by no more than 2 weeks.

my payments are usually a week late if anything but i always pay.

 

these last few months whenever my payment is late we are getting harrasing phonecalls on a daily basis to make payment.

at present i am 2 weeks in arrears which is a grand total of just under £20 (huge money)

today i have had a visit while i was out by 2 of the staff from my local store (both their names were written on the card.

the card was telling me they they called to discuss my account and remove goods to which i have to be honest about at first it did make me chuckle all for £20.

my wife fished out our agreement from when we took the finance out on 29th march 2010.

i was reading the bit about

REPOSSESION : YOUR RIGHTS.

"if you do not keep your side of the agreement but you have paid at least one third of the total ammount payable under this agreement that is xxxxxxx we may not take back the goods against your wishes unless we get a court order. if we do take th egoods without your consent or a court order you have the right to get back any money that you have paid under this agreement.

 

so my question is this, if they come to the house and im at work and my wife lets them in but refuses to sign the form and they remove the goods without ME giving consent.

would this mean that i can get my money back that i have paid so far,

 

i know this may sound strange to some but i am sick and tired of seeing these companies bully and harass people.

me and my wife have discussed this and we no longer wish to have any dealings with brighthouse.

so what could be classed as me giving consent to take the goods?

would it have to be my signature or would my wife letting them into the house be classed as consent.

i have advised my wife they if they come to the door and im at work just to let them in and try and talk about it reoasnably but not to try and stop them or cause a fuss if they want to remove goods but to stipulate that she is not giving them permission to do so.

this way i would be able to get my money back from them.

 

really sorry for the long speech but just want to make sure i know where i stand against these bullies.

 

just us a quick note, when i phone them to make my payment up from the previous week they always say that they cannot take it unless i pay that weeks payment at the same time althogh it is not due untill the saturday.

apparently the system does not allow this...:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your wife doesnt even have to let them in - unless they have a court order and you would know about that as a claim would have needed to be issued in the first instance.

 

You should be making a complaint to the OFT about this harrassment.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for such a quick response.

what i ultimatly wanted to do (yes this may be the wrong way to go about things ) but is to get my money back from them as i realy do not want this company inmy life any more.

i was hoping if we just played ball with them and let them carry out there nasty deed of removing the goods without my consent would this be the the bast way of getting my money back.

 

Your wife doesnt even have to let them in - unless they have a court order and you would know about that as a claim would have needed to be issued in the first instance.

 

You should be making a complaint to the OFT about this harrassment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

keep that card safe as well. That is evidence.

Isn't it strange how when we hear of this, BH say it is a one off thing yet we hear this time and time again.

Do BrightHouse advocate unlawful practices. Answers on a postcard dropped through a letterbox.

 

The only way they can take the goods back is if

a) You let them

b) They get a court order

c) You leave the goods outside

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they would also be acting against the law

 

which is why i posted that link.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If i'm right in what i'm thinking, you are wanting to give the goods back and recover any payments you have made thus far?

 

Firstly if i was you i would NOT let them in to your property unless they turn up with a court order or you are consenting for them to take the goods,

anything they wish to discuss can be talked about at the door,

after all we are only talking about 2 weeks late payments here (plus late payment charges).

 

Unfortunately (im no expert so i would double check) you will not be able to claim any money back from them if you wish to return the goods.

On your agreement there will be a section titled Termination: Your Rights.

 

On an agreement i have in front of my from an item i have purchased from them it states :

 

'You have a right to end this agreement.

To do so, you should write to the person you make your payments to.

We will then be entitled to the return of the goods and to HALF the total amount payable under the agreement, that is £XXX.XX.

If you have already payed at least this amount plus any overdue instalments and have taken reasonable care of the goods, you will not have to pay any more.'

 

I understand where you are coming when you say 'if they take the goods without consent are they breaching the agreement'.

If i were you i would find out if they need written consent to remove goods.

If you invite them in and let them remove goods, in my opinion this would be considered as consent and it doesnt state on the agreement that it has to be 'written' consent.

 

If this was to get messy and go to small claims court, you might have a battle on your hands proving you did not give them verbal consent,

i would also consider the fact you are a self admitted regular late payer.

 

Lets get thing in to perspective,

i know you are angry about the harrasment and this issue definately needs to be adressed

but are you really willing to let them walk away with your two years of payments then put your tv back on the shelf as reconditioned or alternatively have a small claims court battle,

all because of two weeks late paymnets (plus any late payment charges).

 

If i were you i would just bite the bullet pay the account up to date,

finish paying the last year on the tv off and never deal with them again now you know what to expect from them.

 

pinkfloydianuk

ALL COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS MADE ARE BASED ON MY OWN EXPERIENCES AND OPINIONS, IF IN DOUBT SEEK ADVICE FROM A QUALIFIED SOLICITOR.

 

<<<<IF YOU LIKE WHAT YOU READ, DON'T FORGET TO HIT THE STAR AND GIVE ME SOME REP.

 

ANY PRIVATE MESSAGES DEEMED TO BE NON SUBJECT RELATED, DEROGATORY OR INSULTING WILL BE REPORTED.

 

pinkfloydianuk

 

:attention:

Link to post
Share on other sites

'they' can NEVER take goods even WITH a COURT ORDER

 

they are NOT bailiffs and NEVER EVER will be

 

only court bailiffs can take goods - end of!!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and they have NO remit to add ANY penalty charges either.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
but if my wife states that she is not giving them consent to remove goods then surely they are clearly in breach of the agreement if they do so

 

They will lie. They will say that she consented, and there's two of them to swear to it. You will never prove otherwise. Unless your wife is able and willing to wear a recording device, this is a poor tactic. If she's ready for a bit of espionage then it might work out really well - catch them on tape saying that they are taking the goods against her protests, and you have an unloseable claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so how long will it take them to get a court order to remove my goods? and if they cannot remove my goods as you say DX how do they go about getting their items back.

 

 

im currently 2 weeks i arears and my local store called me threatening to come and remocve my goods. but when i spke up and said "fine go get yourself a court order then come back to me" she shut up then tried to explain that they do not need a court order,n after the discussion went on for a few more mins she finaly gave in and i think she recognised that i was not going to juts lay down and take it and that i knew what i was talking about (all thanks to CAG).

 

apologies for the bad spelling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't say I have heard of any company (BH,BAYV,Perfect Homes) going to court. I'm sure it must happen on occasion.

Obviously you could hand the goods back or you could come to some arrangement to clear the arrears but do not sign a new agreement without checking with CAG first

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi silver fox

I have just spoke their head office and they refuse to let me make the payments up over a period if time as they don't accept part payments.

I stated that if it wasn't for there unlawful fees I would be able to bring my account up to date. I asked if they would waive these fees to which they refused.

 

I'm currently waiting for my paperwork from Brighthouse do I claim back all the fees they have charged me over the last few years.

Bit don't know where I go from here in my current situation. Even if I offer to make a small payment try actually refuse to take it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write to head office, with the account number. Say that you are struggling financially, but you wish to pay as much as you can towards the arrears. Enclose a cheque for a small but useful amount - £20 to £50. They will phone you to refuse it, because they know that to put that in writing makes them look very bad. Have a tape recorder ready.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...