Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Schipoo and thanks for the update. This is a brilliant result as rergards your fight with HMRC. If you can manage a Donation to the site, it would be greatly appreciated. Let us know how it goes as regards the fees being sought by Independant Tax.
    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
    • On the d-day issue, * we know sunaks shameful self-interest preferring a hope at using lies for self-promotion over honoring our heroes, * we know Starmer demonstrated his statesmanship with other statesmen and women,  ** BUT where was Farage? Was he in a pub looking for self-promotion? .. Surely as a wannabe statesman - he should have spent a bit of his (someone elses?) cash attending the ceremonies? or wasn't he offered a seat near enough the front to interest him?   mind you .. "I said I wanted my county back. Well now I want my life back ... I am not a career politician... I won't be changing my mind again, I promise you" - Nigel Farage, stepping down from public life. 5 July 2016  
    • dont need them.   let the defendant play the terms game
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hi, would like some help re Robinson Way and Statur Barred Please


CALLYX
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4492 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I had an account with Next that I couldn't pay some years ago, then I started getting letters from Robinson Way regarding this debt, been a long term lurker on here, I sent them the CCA letter, they have never produced a CCA or Statements.

 

I keep an eye on my credit file and the Next Debt dropped off in January this year, it showed I had defaulted in December 1996 so a week or so ago I sent the statue barred letter I found posted on here.

 

Could anybody help regarding their reply please

 

Dear Mrs xxxx

 

Further to your recent communication we do not accept that the above account is time barred under the limitation act.

 

Even were you to demonstrate that this debt is time barred, the debt still legally exists and may be reported accordingly to the credit reference bureaux, as appropriate.

 

We are prepared, however, to offer you a substantial reduction to settle this account once and for all. Should you be interested in taking up this option, please telephone us on the above number.

 

Now I'm a tiny bit worried I have jumped the gun a bit so any help, advise, whatever would be great.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course they wont accept its statute barred otherwise they admit they cant chase you for the money, if it wasn't statute barred why offer the substantial reduction??? They know its unenforceable they are clutching at straws with threats I would just keep the letter, and ignore Robbers Way, its dropped off credit file so it is statute barred they know they have unenforceable debt and need the cash. I would ignore them personally and certainly dont ring them about their kind offer. Be brave

I know my rights Mr DCA I'm with the CAG......hello hello where you gone Mr DCA8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I remeber it was two or three months before they defaulted me so prob September/October 1996, maybe a bit before? Can't tell exactly as it is longer on my credit report. Should have taken a bit more notice I suppose. Sorry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if it is that long ago and no written acknowledgement has been made in a clear period of six years then it is SB.

 

You should write to them and tell them that it is SB and that no payment will be forthcoming. Once they have been told this they must stop chasing under OFT guidelines.

 

Are you in Scotland or elsewhere?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Padja, I've ignored them for so long, letters just sent back and forth, no response to my request for a CCA or anything else, just used to get a letter about once every two months or so. I honestly thought they have taken me to court before now. I won't speak to them, that is one thing I have learnt from being a lurker lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if it is that long ago and no written acknowledgement has been made in a clear period of six years then it is SB.

 

You should write to them and tell them that it is SB and that no payment will be forthcoming. Once they have been told this they must stop chasing under OFT guidelines.

 

Are you in Scotland or elsewhere?

 

ims

 

 

Yes ims it is that long ago or maybe even longer, so I just should write what you say and leave it at that. If they continue to write should I report them?

No I am not in Scotland, just sunny North Yorkshire

Thank you for taking the time to reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if it were me I'd ignore them and see what their next move is.

 

By the way, although the debt legally exists it cannot be enforced in court so as long as the SB criterial are fulfilled there is nothing they can do to you.

 

The only reason I asked about Scotland is that the law is different in that the debt is extinguished after 5 years.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if it is that long ago and no written acknowledgement has been made in a clear period of six years then it is SB.

 

You should write to them and tell them that it is SB and that no payment will be forthcoming. Once they have been told this they must stop chasing under OFT guidelines.

 

Are you in Scotland or elsewhere?

 

ims

 

I have sent the SB letter which I think says what you say I should say and I have noticed in this letter they haven't made any threats or directly asked for payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even were you to demonstrate that this debt is time barred, the debt still legally exists and may be reported accordingly to the credit reference bureaux, as appropriate.

 

Besides the fact you don't have to demonstrate that the alleged debt is Statute Barred, the onus is on them to prove that it isn't, they cannot record it on your credit file.

 

That letter warrants a complaint to Trading Standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello again

 

I have received another letter regarding this debt, it states "that before Court Action is considered we may arrange for a local collector to call at your address" and "Your account may be sent to our local collector in 10 days time"

 

It gives me an option to call them to agree an affordable repayment plan.

 

I am now going to report them, but as my complaint may not be looked into straight away, I would like to reply to this letter asking them to prove it is NOT statue barred, does anybody have an idea of what to write so I do not look stupid. I just want this situation closed.

 

Thank you for any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've sent the Statute Barred letter & they've ignored it and continued to pursue without proving it's not SB which is against OFT guidelines. Ignore them but you should complain to Trading Standards via; http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Dl1/Directories/UsefulContactsByCategory/Governmentcitizensandrightscontacts/DG_195948

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes complain to trading standards you've done your bit, all this letter is trying to do is to get a response so they can carry on with the threat-o-grams, once they realise you wont be responding they will stop bothering you.

I know my rights Mr DCA I'm with the CAG......hello hello where you gone Mr DCA8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they've been told it's SB and you won't be paying, and they are still threatening you, then definitely complain. I highly doubt they will send a doorstep collector, if they do just tell them to go away. They have no rights and there's no requirement to speak to them. Robbingscum Way are just threatening you in the hop you'll crack. Complain about them to Trading Standards, OFT and FOS, then carry on ignoring their efforts to bully you into paying. They'd be idiotic to try and take you to court, but if they do the SB status is a complete defense and it'll be thrown out in your favour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...