Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all, hope you can help. I've received a £4k repair estimate from the main dealer after my 2016 F30 330e developed the dreaded drivetrain error. The qoute is for a replacement cell module and associated labour and various bits and bobs to get it done. I initially had them investigate the issue when it first popped up a year ago. They replaced the auxillary battery which 'fixed' the issue for a few months before returning. Last Novemner the issue escalated to 'Battery not charging' which would clear after powering off the car , and disappear. Took it into the dealer and they diagnoised a faulty high voltage battery under the boot but could not do any work as they needed to schedule more cars for this 'specialist high voltage work'. So they said I could continue to drive the car until they got in touch when the car could be booked in for repairs. Roll on to April, the issue became severe (battery not charging error not going away, car in limp mode one morning) and car completly died at a traffic light same day (dashboard flashing all over the place), couldnt engage in 'Drive' and had to be recovered by AA to the dealer. Turns out car was now only running on the 12v battery in the boot and that had run flat as the hybrid function had stopped working altogether. My question is whether this is a reasonable estimate. Could this be done cheaper elsewhere? The dealer has servived this car from new hence took it them in the hope they'd not point fingers at any other party. Should I be paying for this at all since I raised the issue with them before it escalted and resulted in a now expensive fault? I also suspect the KLE may have gone too based on other posts, but the dealer hasnt qouted for that yet. I worry they'll' 'discover' that after I've already shelled out for a new cell module and end up lumbered with another bill to replace the KLE. Feels like I know about what they need to do than they do. The Service Advisor has been completely useless. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    • The Petrol Station is Shell Garage Wickham (Hampshire ) Another person obviously had the same issue as they had called the garage previously-
    • Thanks Dave, that all sounds clear to me. In terms of avoiding PCNs, I'm not sure if I can. I need to be able to park in that spot, especially as I've got kids to lug forth and back for the school run. Likewise it's not always possible to use the MA's permit system either, as I've not always got them to hand. So, if I'm actively avoiding PCNs, then it could mean I've given in to their idiotic rules. But, I do get what you're saying, as I imagine the risks go up if they claim there are multiple PCNs to be paid at court. Not sure what to do with this one.
    • Is it possible you could qualify for a DRO (Debt Relief Order) and ditch the IVA ? https://debtcamel.co.uk/end-iva-change-to-dro/  
    • My IVA which I began in 2021 has for around a year now been passed to credit expert - I find this company and it's staff obnoxious and insensitive money grabbing monsters.  What is my legal right can I have my IVA moved to another ip what happens if Hanover sell my file?  I am ina real bad situation where my kids are unwell and this crest expert supervisor is saying I should try more than what I agreed despite my situation being very bad and kids unwell.   I feel like they are bullying me and I duh I where to turn.  I keep getting emails saying we at credit expert are in charge of your iva now but still I got messages about my review annual from Hanover which I sent documents and now I got a response from credit expert saying they think I agreed to pay more - how ludicrous is that how can I keep these bullies at bay.   Who can I complain too without messing up my IVA.  I'm going to post below what they sent me please someone help me as they are making me suicidal now. These evil people g coincidently all Indians with weak English which is another issue as communication feels like a battle each time.    Good afternoon,   We hope you are keeping well.   In accordance with the terms of your voluntary arrangement you a required to comply with the following modification:   The debtor must seek to either obtain full time employment or improve self employed income to equivalent thereof as soon as possible and a full review of the debtor’s income and expenditure must be undertaken by the supervisor. The contributions shall increase after taking into account any increased costs in respect of travel and should commence in the month following the review. If any instances of co-habitation with the debtor by any person aged 18 or over occur during the term of this arrangement and where there is reasonable expectation that board and lodging should be paid, the contribution will be added into this arrangement in full. The debtor agrees to provide an income and expenditure review in the month following any loss of child related income. Any surplus identified is to be made available immediately for the benefit of unsecured creditors in the arrangement.    In order to ensure that the terms of the voluntary arrangement are adhered to, I require you to provide evidence that you complies with the above modification along with any supporting evidence.   Alternatively, if you believe you are no longer able to comply with the modification please do inform us.   I eagerly await your response to the points raised within 14 days of the date of this email.   If you have any further queries, please contact Customer Service on ‪0800 0431 431‬ or by email at [email protected].   Thank you for your comprehension.   Plese guys advice me what I can reply as I don't have any more money for these thieves and their annual review is an annual monster nightmare how can I tell them I'm not willing to be bullied and can't paid more    تھا ks   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DLA award increases but payment starts after the award date


Winnie Wotsit
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4515 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've not made myself clear. The DWP letter says you will get x amount from such a date, but the payment starts from the following Wednesday. Even if you got paid in arrears, when the payment does come through, you're not paid for the single days between the date on the letter and the payment date of the Wednesday.

 

Here is an earlier thread that gives a better example : http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?245512-DLA-first-payment-date.

Edited by Winnie Wotsit
Link to post
Share on other sites

Still don't understand what you are getting at, I've always been paid odd days when benefits are changed, such as when I change my Motability car. That said I can't remember back to the start whether I lost a couple of days or not. It used to be that pensions where paid on Mondays, sickness related benefits on Wednesday and the dole on Thursdays. It has changed recently, and I got paid the odd days. My wifes gets her state pension and pension credits on Monday, her DLA on Tuesday, I get my DLA on Wednesday and my ESA on Thursday. I suppose in a way when it went from weekly to fortnightly I lost a weeks money and when it went to four weekly I lost out again. But there's not much one can do about it. My wife had the same problem when she was working went from weekly to monthly and had to make a weeks money last 4 weeks (we never recovered from that). If I was to lose any benefits I presume they would stop straight away, and not carry on for four weeks (although I may be wrong).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still don't understand what you are getting at

 

Simply put, the DWP dont pay those odd days. You lose them. If your claim was awarded on a Thursday, your payments dont start until the following Wednesday. Meaning you lose 6 days money. If the claim was for HRM and HRC on DLA it would work out at approx £17.80 per day or around £107.

Link to post
Share on other sites

??????????? I just typed in pages of text in answer but it all disappeared. I can't say I ever noticed not being paid from start of claim. I know I got carers allowance from day one and I'm pretty sure my wifes DLA MRC was also from day she put claim in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've now had it confirmed by the DWP, CAB and a brace of other welfare rights agencys that the claimant does lose payments for odd days.

 

I can't say I ever noticed not being paid from start of claim. I know I got carers allowance from day one and I'm pretty sure my wifes DLA MRC was also from day she put claim in.

 

I dont know about CA, IS or any of the other benefits. I know it is the case for DLA.

Edited by Winnie Wotsit
Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought my wife's DLA was backdated to when they received the claim form, I just took their word for it when they said it was. To be honest I did not work out how much she should have got exactly, just that it was about right give or take. It may have been down a day or so, all I know is the 100s we got have been a real help. I don't know how we manage without it and we were so gratefully we did not check like you. I did check the carers allowance, so I know we go that backdated to when entitled (when she was awarded the middle rate care component of DLA). Had it been a few days out though, I probably would have let it go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've already fallen foul of this rule before. But that was for a period of two days for MRC. So it was only a few pounds. This time it’s for 6 days at £107. I have just checked a CA award and after working it out, that was also not paid for odd days.

 

If after an appeal, you get a large sum, then most people won’tcheck (that’s the idea the government work on ;) ). But if your DLA changes, then it becomes very obvious when a letter says one thing and the actual payment is 6 days later.

 

Pounds to claimants, millions to the DWP.

 

More concerning is the amount of so called benefit advisors who work for large organisations, who are not even aware of this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...