Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Only trying to help.  Ain't being nasty.  Some
    • Hi folks, I've just found previous documentation. I thought it had gone missing. I'd forgotten that I did appeal it through POPLA but I can't find the thread on here that, I assume, I posted for help. Appeal letter is dated 27/10/2020 with a rejection. I genuinely had forgotten about this so apologies for misleading you. A lot has happened in the years since the ticket was issued. We closed down a couple of businesses and moved to the opposite end of the country to retire. The documents I have are scanned copies. I no longer have the originals. If there's anything you'd like to see, please let me know and I'll post them, although it probably won't be until tomorrow now, but I'll be looking in on this page tonight. Thank you for the responses so far :)
    • Hello! After emailing them I received this reply:   I have drafted the following, please would you be able to comment as to if you think it is correct/sufficient? "Thank you for your email.   Thanks you for confirming that the vehicle does not have these features as stated in the advertisement.    I am sure you are aware that the Consumer Rights Act 2015 provides the short term right to reject within 30 days. Statutory rights cannot be taken away from a consumer, and any attempt to do so is illegal.   Please can you advise how best to return the vehicle?" Thanks in advance!
    • I find that highly disrespectful Sir/Madam just so you know.
    • Not quite sure what you are trying to say but anyway please could you avoid posting solid blocks of text because it is extremely difficult for people to follow – especially if they are using small screen such as telephones. I have restructured your post above. Properly spaced and punctuated please. Thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DLA award increases but payment starts after the award date


Winnie Wotsit
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4515 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've not made myself clear. The DWP letter says you will get x amount from such a date, but the payment starts from the following Wednesday. Even if you got paid in arrears, when the payment does come through, you're not paid for the single days between the date on the letter and the payment date of the Wednesday.

 

Here is an earlier thread that gives a better example : http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?245512-DLA-first-payment-date.

Edited by Winnie Wotsit
Link to post
Share on other sites

Still don't understand what you are getting at, I've always been paid odd days when benefits are changed, such as when I change my Motability car. That said I can't remember back to the start whether I lost a couple of days or not. It used to be that pensions where paid on Mondays, sickness related benefits on Wednesday and the dole on Thursdays. It has changed recently, and I got paid the odd days. My wifes gets her state pension and pension credits on Monday, her DLA on Tuesday, I get my DLA on Wednesday and my ESA on Thursday. I suppose in a way when it went from weekly to fortnightly I lost a weeks money and when it went to four weekly I lost out again. But there's not much one can do about it. My wife had the same problem when she was working went from weekly to monthly and had to make a weeks money last 4 weeks (we never recovered from that). If I was to lose any benefits I presume they would stop straight away, and not carry on for four weeks (although I may be wrong).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still don't understand what you are getting at

 

Simply put, the DWP dont pay those odd days. You lose them. If your claim was awarded on a Thursday, your payments dont start until the following Wednesday. Meaning you lose 6 days money. If the claim was for HRM and HRC on DLA it would work out at approx £17.80 per day or around £107.

Link to post
Share on other sites

??????????? I just typed in pages of text in answer but it all disappeared. I can't say I ever noticed not being paid from start of claim. I know I got carers allowance from day one and I'm pretty sure my wifes DLA MRC was also from day she put claim in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've now had it confirmed by the DWP, CAB and a brace of other welfare rights agencys that the claimant does lose payments for odd days.

 

I can't say I ever noticed not being paid from start of claim. I know I got carers allowance from day one and I'm pretty sure my wifes DLA MRC was also from day she put claim in.

 

I dont know about CA, IS or any of the other benefits. I know it is the case for DLA.

Edited by Winnie Wotsit
Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought my wife's DLA was backdated to when they received the claim form, I just took their word for it when they said it was. To be honest I did not work out how much she should have got exactly, just that it was about right give or take. It may have been down a day or so, all I know is the 100s we got have been a real help. I don't know how we manage without it and we were so gratefully we did not check like you. I did check the carers allowance, so I know we go that backdated to when entitled (when she was awarded the middle rate care component of DLA). Had it been a few days out though, I probably would have let it go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've already fallen foul of this rule before. But that was for a period of two days for MRC. So it was only a few pounds. This time it’s for 6 days at £107. I have just checked a CA award and after working it out, that was also not paid for odd days.

 

If after an appeal, you get a large sum, then most people won’tcheck (that’s the idea the government work on ;) ). But if your DLA changes, then it becomes very obvious when a letter says one thing and the actual payment is 6 days later.

 

Pounds to claimants, millions to the DWP.

 

More concerning is the amount of so called benefit advisors who work for large organisations, who are not even aware of this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...