Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you’ve ever wondered how you might fare in armed combat, the first 20 minutes of Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan is likely to make you thank your lucky stars you were born too late to storm the Normandy beaches on June 6 1944. I suspect many of us might be driven to identify with those men who were absolutely turned to stone by fear. And yet these young men, mainly conscripts, screwed their courage to the sticking point and did the job the fate had chosen for them, heroes all.   .. UK PM Sunak perhaps thinks he understands mind numbing fear better than many as he dishonorably fled the beachhead to do nothing more than double down on dishonest spin and lies from the safety of a UK studio .. The Normandy heroes who not only held their positions, but advanced through hell to a victory that changed the entire course of history .. undoubtedly hold a different perspective.     from a perspective in TheConversation     .. 'That was the slot that sunaks team offered for the interview
    • Yes, send a message to the purchaser but keep it very friendly and simply that you noticed that the package has now been delivered.  I suggest that you ask them if they want to keep the package still or if they would rather return it and that if they want to keep it then please will they return your payment to you to your PayPal address. Keep it as polite and friendly as possible and then we will decide what to do if he doesn't reply or refuses.  Meanwhile I will have a look at Google earth and see if you are able to spot the gas meter outside the house to get an idea if the delivery is real. Get a screenshot
    • Santander have sent their final response and have agreed that they were in the wrong. They will be refunding me the amount I am due and £50 for the delay.  Just the interest factor would be more than double the £50 that they are offering. Thinking to just close this and move on. Is this what you would do?  Opened a FOS case on the 1st of June but haven't heard back yet. 
    • It just been delivered and ive had a live chat with p2g to get some proof of deliverey and they send me a picture of the parcel placed in a gas meter box which they class as a ' 'Safe Place'  and not placed into the hands of the buyer which is either a good thing as the buyer can claim he never received It so i can claim against p2g or a bad thing . Do p2g have coordinators when taking pictures and scanning of parcels ?  I know Royal Mail do ... I'm going to send the buyer a message and see what he says
    • Eight in ten voters support blocking bonuses for polluting water firm bosses INEWS.CO.UK Polling for i exposes level of public anger over sewage dumping  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with complaint - advice needed DLA Refusal blantant lies in letter and over phone.


Redordeaduk2011
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4572 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all

 

Sorry to bother you guys and gals again but having been really ill I am now really anoyed.

 

The back story:

 

In 2006 I became ill, I was told many times that it was all in my head and that I would soon become better.

 

In 2008/2009 I applied for DLA as my conditions had not improved and I had been told I had Hypermobility a permenant condition, Pelvic Girdle Pain a permenant condition, and Cronic Pain Syndrome.

 

They sent for a letter from my consultant in April 2009.

 

In July 2009 my third and final child was born and we were rushed into hospital as she (the doctors believe) has caught swine flu - this was on the 14th July.

 

On the 16th July 2009 the rejection letter arrived stating that my consultant had said my condition would not last more than six months and therefore I did not qualify.

 

With my daughter being ill I filed the letter to deal with later. We were back a forth to hospital for about a week and a bit. I was then really depressed and suffering and about a month after the letter arrived I felt able to deal with it so I called the helpdesk to get the details I needed mainly the letter from the consultant. The helpdesk informed me that they didn't need to provide the letter and on top of that I was out of time and couldn't appeal anyway.

 

Given my mental health and the amount of pain I was in and the fact that I was out of time I did not appeal.

 

 

In June/July this year I spoke to a consultant and we discussed the fact that I had become slightly worse and that my condition was still continuing but that I now had fibromialgia and depression. I mentioned that I wasn't happy as the consultation had stated catergorically that I would be better within six months and now here I was two years later in a worse possition. The consultant checked the letter from 2009 and confirmed that it stated that they had hope for an improvement in my condition within six months, not that my condition would only last six months.

 

I wrote a complaint to the DWP in August 2011, and a week ago I received a telephone call stating that my records had been destroyed a few months ago.

 

I have written off for the consultant's letter from 2009 and I am searching (well my husband bless him is dragging down the boxes from the attic with all our paperwork in so I can look) for the letter from the DWP refusing my claim because I will have kept it.

 

My main questions are:

 

If I find those two items do you think they will really look into my complaint?

Do you think that I can have them review it?

I've just had an Atos medical because I also submitted a new claim as I was sure something would go wrong with the complaint so if I get awarded do you think I can ask them to back date it?

Given the mis-information and outright lie can I ask fo rcompensation - I don't really want this but if they refuse to backdate the claim should I ask for that instead?

 

Any advice gratefully received.

 

Redx

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have indeed destroyed all your records, then there is nothing to review and you should make a new application.

 

Also if you are going to use the telephone to contact them, then make sure you record all the calls so they can't be denied later, else use a letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Conniff,

 

Thank's for your reply, as I said above, I did re-apply at the same time I put in the complaint, I had the Atos medical using form DLA-140 yesterday. My question was more along the lines of, if I can provide the letter from the DWP and the consultant's letter which don't say the same thing could I ask for the DLA to be backdated as they lied in the letter and when I called they lied with the information they provided?

 

They have already confirmed that they would review the case should I provide the information, in the form of the letter from the first consultant - which should be with me next week - and the letter from the DWP refusing because my condition will not last longer than six months which is boxed upstairs due to renovations and adaptations being completed on the house I live in.

 

Thanks for any help you can give

 

Redx

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are two parts to your problem as I see it.

1. The previous claim

2. the new claim

 

You are well out of date with the first. There is an absolute period of 13 months in which you can ask for a late appeal to be accepted. You can complain but that would be as a matter of principle only.

As regards your new claim, it will not be backdated to beyond the date you claimed. It certainly would not go back to 2009!

 

I do hope you are not intending using any evidence from as far back as 2009? The max they would accept would be 12 months old, and the most important report you could obtain is from your GP. He/she would have to certify that you have the needs you quote, AND nothing about your illness.

 

eg, he would have to confirm that you need help to wash, go to the toilet, dress etc and for mobility that you cannot walk any further than 50 metres in a slow and difficult manner.

 

The more the GP loads the report with that sort of info the better.

 

I lost my DLA 7 years ago and didn't appeal due to illness. I reclaimed this year only on what I was like now. It took two goes at getting a decent GP report. I had to write everything down for the GP telling as it is. The GP then called me in and we went through the report form together.

Mine wasn't backdated - it was my fault for not appealing in time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Taraquin

 

Thanks for your information, my GP refused to complete the report which is why I had an Atos medical. I used my current situation, but my current situation is not that worse then it was in 2009 or even 2006 when the condition started.

 

I am not asking the dwp to allow an appeal I am asking them to explain why they lied when they refused the dla in 2009. I suppose I'll have to wait but was just wondering if there was anyone out there who has been through the same situation of a blatant lie being the reason why the dla was refused.

 

My form back then was the same as now and I know that back then my gp refused to complete a form the same as this time. he refuses to do them for anyone lol.

 

I don't expect it to be back dated to 2009 however I do want a full and frank explanation as to why it was refused the way it was.

 

Redx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope none of them at the surgury will do any claims for dwp, say it's not part of their job lol, not that I'm worried because I've had the atos assessment and they already know I'm willing to go to tribunal with it, because I told them in the complaint form. They have linked the complaint to the ongoing case so fingers crossed I'll get somewhere this time round lol.

 

it would be so much easier if the gp would tho.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...