Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If anybody has any advice here, it would be greatly appreciated, I already suffer with pre-existing disabilities & have struggled with this so far. 
    • so return of goods order etc etc read upload  scan pages to jpg, redact in mspaint. the convert to and merge to one mass PDF  read upload and use the online listed sites for all 3 stages. do you want to keep the car? i will guess this was a manual paper claimform direct from the co.court or was it org sent from salford bulk processing and has just got reaq ssigned?      
    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue –  29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM 1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached  2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00. The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month. 3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement, Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us. Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement 9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate 4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:- a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement  number xxxxxx. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     The total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by First class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges 5.  At the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage. Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024  What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg  
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Job Seekers Allowance - NI contributions level?


jimatgp
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4573 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My wife has just been made redundant and her application for JSA was refused as she has apparently not paid enough NI contributions. I am contemplating appealing the decision so thought I'd better check exactly what NI contributions were required to qualify for JSA. After hours of fruitless searching I've ended up here.

 

I can find nowhere that states the exact level of NI required. All the "official" sites simply say that JSA entitlement is based on your NI contributions... but they won't tell you how much NI you need to have paid. Is this some kind of state secret? Do they think the calculation is too complicated for us mere mortals to understand? Or are they just scared we might uncover too many errors in their arbitrary decision-making process?

 

So does anyone out there know what the formula is for calculating the amount of NI you need to have paid to qualify?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The formula isn't arbitrary and isn't secret, but it is a little confusing.

 

First off, this is benefit year 2011 - benefit years run from January to January. For a claim made in benefit year 2011, the last two completed tax years prior to 2011 are considered. Since the tax year runs from April - April, the relevant ones are 2008/2009 and 2009/2010. Then there are two conditions to be satisfied.

 

First contribution condition: in either of the two relevant income tax years (RITYs) she must have actually paid NI contributions on earnings that are at least 25 times the weekly lower earnings limit for NI.

 

Second contribution condition: in both of the RITYs she must have paid or been credited with NI contributions on earnings that are at least 50 times the weekly lower earnings limit for NI.

 

The lower earnings limit for this year is £102 per week. It will have been slightly lower in the RITYs they used for your wife's claim as it is adjusted annually.

Edited by antone
Corrected figure for lower earnings limit - I had put £104

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply antone. Very helpful. I just don't understand why that information isn't published in any of the pamphlets or web sites that deal with JSA. I guess the assumption is that Joe Public is too thick to be trusted with such complex information!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The information is publicised on the DWP website. The contribution conditions (alongside other conditions of JSA) are set out in the IS/JSA guides, which can be located here via the CAG library as well as the DWP website if you want to have a look through. A lot of reading though!

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i remember being told something about this. Try asking for income based job seeker's allowance, not contribution based. i think it works differently, and the NI should hopefully not affect the claim.

 

I don't think you can ask for income based. I seem to remember that they check NI first and then if you don't qualify, check income.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The formula isn't arbitrary and isn't secret, but it is a little confusing.

 

First off, this is benefit year 2011 - benefit years run from January to January. For a claim made in benefit year 2011, the last two completed tax years prior to 2011 are considered. Since the tax year runs from April - April, the relevant ones are 2008/2009 and 2009/2010. Then there are two conditions to be satisfied.

 

First contribution condition: in either of the two relevant income tax years (RITYs) she must have actually paid NI contributions on earnings that are at least 25 times the weekly lower earnings limit for NI.

 

Second contribution condition: in both of the RITYs she must have paid or been credited with NI contributions on earnings that are at least 50 times the weekly lower earnings limit for NI.

 

The lower earnings limit for this year is £102 per week. It will have been slightly lower in the RITYs they used for your wife's claim as it is adjusted annually.[/quote

 

Hi Antone,

Can you help me with this also please.

I went sick from work in Jan 2009, I earned about £125 a week after tax.

I was put on income based and contribution based after my ssp ran out. I was then sacked from my job in July 2009.

I was informed in August that I had been put onto contribution based only in April 2011.

Is this correct, the DWP told me that I have to be put on the benefit which pays me the most money but I am not getting any more money.

I am now having to pay council tax and prescriptions. I am also having to prove to my council that I was not aware of being put on contribution based so am in arrears with my council tax. I didnt get a letter until August and as I was not getting any extra money it did not occur to me to inform the council.

I will be about £8 a week worse off because of the council tax.

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Antone,

Can you help me with this also please.

I went sick from work in Jan 2009, I earned about £125 a week after tax.

I was put on income based and contribution based after my ssp ran out. I was then sacked from my job in July 2009.

I was informed in August that I had been put onto contribution based only in April 2011.

Is this correct, the DWP told me that I have to be put on the benefit which pays me the most money but I am not getting any more money.

I am now having to pay council tax and prescriptions. I am also having to prove to my council that I was not aware of being put on contribution based so am in arrears with my council tax. I didnt get a letter until August and as I was not getting any extra money it did not occur to me to inform the council.

I will be about £8 a week worse off because of the council tax.

Thanks.

 

This is a bit strange. If you were/are sick (rather than claiming JSA) can you tell us some more information? Specifically:

 

What benefit are you on? By this I mean your primary benefit - such as Incapacity Benefit, ESA or perhaps Income Support.

Was any explanation given for the change in your benefit? Did they send you any letter explaining this?

Has there been any change in your circumstances? Do you have a new partner, for example, or have you received any large amount of money?

 

Also note that if benefits are your only source of income, you may still be entitled to Council Tax Benefit, Housing Benefit and help with healthcare costs - regardless of whether your benefits are contribution- or income-based. You can speak to your local council about the first two, and your Jobcentre should be able to give you form HC1, which is an application for help with costs like prescriptions and dental treatment.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I was ill from a work accident was on ssp then when it ran out I went on esa.

I got dismissed from work.

I won my tribunal and was put in the work focused group.

I was awarded a bit of money in compensation in May but that doesnt get taken into account for 52 weeks and was not very much.

The letters just say a change in circumstances.

I was told by the esa people that I am was changed from cb and ib because i have t be on the benefit that pays more, i dont get any more.

I am going to get help with some of my council tax but have built up a bill because no one told me.

I am having to pay out more with no extra coming in.

I have a working child and am awarded DLA mobility.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The information is publicised on the DWP website. The contribution conditions (alongside other conditions of JSA) are set out in the IS/JSA guides... A lot of reading though!

 

Tons of information... thank you. BUT it STILL doesn't actually state anywhere what the actual calculation is for how much NI contributions you have to have paid to be eligible for CB JSA. Thanks to antone I now know this. But why is it not published anywhere?

 

Just out of interest antone, how do you know what the magic formula is?

Link to post
Share on other sites

?

 

Just out of interest antone, how do you know what the magic formula is?

 

Heh. I used to work for Jobcentre plus.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The information is published in there, starting from paragraph 21051 onward.

 

All of the DMG's are publically available - I encourage people to use exact quotes from these guides when appealing wrongful decisions as it leaves no room for doubt.

 

Antone knows the information because of his former employment, which was processing benefit. He's a handy man to have around, very good at advising others.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heh. I used to work for Jobcentre plus.

 

And you've never been quite the same since!

 

Lol just kidding. We've had a few former employees here, some still work within the role and they are always very helpful.

 

Antone, would you ever consider going back into it but from the perspective of representing claimants? You're very good with advice, you'd make a great rep.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And you've never been quite the same since!

 

Lol just kidding. We've had a few former employees here, some still work within the role and they are always very helpful.

 

Antone, would you ever consider going back into it but from the perspective of representing claimants? You're very good with advice, you'd make a great rep.

 

Appreciate the kind words, Erika - you do a fine job here yourself.

 

I would consider doing welfare advice or representing claimants, though I'd need to broaden my knowledge. I can do ESA, I'm alright with JSA, but IS makes me want to run screaming from the room :lol:

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I was ill from a work accident was on ssp then when it ran out I went on esa.

I got dismissed from work.

I won my tribunal and was put in the work focused group.

I was awarded a bit of money in compensation in May but that doesnt get taken into account for 52 weeks and was not very much.

The letters just say a change in circumstances.

I was told by the esa people that I am was changed from cb and ib because i have t be on the benefit that pays more, i dont get any more.

I am going to get help with some of my council tax but have built up a bill because no one told me.

I am having to pay out more with no extra coming in.

I have a working child and am awarded DLA mobility.

 

Hmm. This is strange. It is true that if you are entitled to both means-tested and contributory benefits, and the amount is the same, then the contributory benefit takes precedence. I would make a point of contacting the office that pays your benefit (not your Jobcentre, it will be called a "Benefit Centre" or a "Benefit Delivery Centre") and ask them what change of circumstances has caused this. This is crucial. There are changes of circumstances that might create your problem, yes. But most of them are obvious: you got married or moved in with someone; you inherited a large sum of money, that kind of thing.

 

Assuming none of this has happened to you, you need to find out from JCP the precise reason they have made this decision. And you are entitled to be told.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...