Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

First capital connect fine help!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4559 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I arrived at city thameslink to find that the ticket that I was going to use has been left at home. (my husbands ticket, which I was told last year I could use infrequently by a ticket guy on the train when I showed it to him with my husbands photocard on it). I only saw that guard a couple of times and not seen him since he said it, will they believe me? if not what should I say?

 

I was spoken to by a ticket inspector, he said I could not pay the penalty fine, they would send out a form for me to fill in.

 

A couple of months later I get a letter saying they are going to take me to court, and asked me to put my side accross. I filled this out saying I had left the ticket at home, and I would have paid the fine if the inspector had let me.

 

They sent another letter saying they are still going to prosecute.

 

I am scarred stiff as if I get a criminal record I will lose my job.

 

I have tried and tried to ring them but it always say nobody can take your call and you cannot leave a message.

 

I am having sleepless nights worriying about this as if I lose my job I will lose my house.

 

I have been advised by the train guards to read the passengers charter, which states that if you don't have a valid ticket you wlll have to pay a £20 fine, but I was not allowed to pay the £20 fine by the inspector?

 

Can anyone help me out here:

It state you pay a penalty fare, why was I not allowed to pay this?

How can I stop this going to court if I can't speak to them?

When am I likely to go to court? This happened in August?

Never been in trouble with the law before, will I get a conviction?

Help.

Edited by EMOSELEY
re-wording.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there, welcome to CAG.

 

I expect the guys will look in later on, as and when their day jobs permit. I think they may need to ask more questions, but I can think of a couple that might help.

 

What type of ticket was it please? And does it need a photocard to go with it?

 

It might also help if you could use the Edit Post button at the bottom right hand side of your message and put some paragraphs in for us. Making it easier to read is likely to get you more help.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would appear you have been reported for fraudulently using your husbands season ticket.

They wont believe that a member of staff said you could use it 'infrequently'.

All you can do now is wit for the letter to arrive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just said the ticket I was going to use was at home!

The main problem I have is that I was not allowed to pay the £20 fine, which is what it says on the trains and in the passenger charter?

I often see guards on the trains in the afternoon selling tickets to people who were obviously able to buy tickets at the start of their journey and didn't.

Why do they get away with it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where evidence suggests that deliberate avoidance of fare is proveable, a penalty notice will not be issued. You cannot pay a £20 Penalty Fare where no notice was issued.

 

If you did not show a valid ticket and claim that you had left a season ticket at home, but did not hold a season ticket in your own name, it is clear that you attempted to avoid the fare due.

 

You need to put your replies in writing to ensure that there are no misunderstandings by either party.

 

The rail company have up to 6 months from the date the alleged offence was detected in which to put the allegation before a Magistrates Court

Link to post
Share on other sites

I often see guards on the trains in the afternoon selling tickets to people who were obviously able to buy tickets at the start of their journey and didn't. Why do they get away with it?

 

How do YOU know that they "were obviously able to buy tickets at the start of their journey and didn't"

 

Where did they travel from?

What facilities were available to them?

 

Not being able to buy a ticket because of genuine problem is a heck of a lot different to travelling on a train without a valid ticket and when questioned, telling an inspector that you had 'left your ticket at home when you did not possess any such season ticket isn't it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you forget about why you wasn't offered a penalty fare as these are issued for a whole range of different scenarios which sadly doesn't apply in this situation and concentrate on the issue of you forgetting your husbands season ticket. How many times is infrequent? Does your husband know you infrequently use his season ticket? If you have read the passenger charter you should also read the national conditions of carriage in relation to the transfer of tickets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...