Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
    • Hello everyone,   Just thought id post an update.   I've today now finally received a claim form from PRA Group. Bit annoying as the last payment to them would have August 2018 so was nearly over the line. I believe my only grounds for defence is that they haven't managed to produce a copy of the DN notice, however from some online research I managed to find some case law that stated they can use their systems screenshot to show proof of it being sent.   I know I have to respond back to their claim form and will do so online on moneyclaim, is now the time to pick up the phone to them and negotiate a deal?   Any advice as always is much appreciated it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cap1 & CCA return


tamadus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4970 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Got phone call today from a dca I think

Ring Ring

Hello

Is that Mr Bardsley

Speaking

Could I have your address and date of birth?

Who am I speaking to?

Michele

Hi Michele do I know you

No will you give me you r address and date of birth

Why would I give you that information?

So that we can identify you

So who are you?

I can’t tell you it’s the law.

I can’t tell you my mother always told me not to talk to strangers.

Click

Strange beings these debt collectors

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

What tha fa??

 

What do you think goes through these people's heads?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
What tha fa??

 

Waht do you think goes through these people's heads?

 

un1boy I don't know what goe's through their heads but I know what I'd like to put through their heads.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
Got phone call today from a dca I think

 

So that we can identify you

So who are you?

I can’t tell you it’s the law.

I can’t tell you my mother always told me not to talk to strangers.

Click

 

Strange beings these debt collectors

 

Anyone got any idea what that law is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

un1boy I don't know what goe's through their heads but I know what I'd like to put through their heads.:D

 

Haha

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone got any idea what that law is.

 

Their law. Come on Terminator, you know as well as I do that these institutions are above the standard law of this country and can do what they want.

 

(Yeah, right!)

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
Their law. Come on Terminator, you know as well as I do that these institutions are above the standard law of this country and can do what they want.

 

(Yeah, right!)

 

I agree but how much longer are they going to have their own way?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can one of you venerable contributors have a look at this thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/58125-cca-time-limit.html

 

I am not too sure about the advice being given. Is this right because to me it looks like this person has made a CCA request and the creditor or DCA has failed to supply a copy of the agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree but how much longer are they going to have their own way?

 

Not for much longer by the time you and Tamadus have finished, eh? ;)

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can one of you venerable contributors have a look at this thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/58125-cca-time-limit.html

 

I am not too sure about the advice being given. Is this right because to me it looks like this person has made a CCA request and the creditor or DCA has failed to supply a copy of the agreement.

 

Hi Jones,

 

If they can provide a copy of an agreement, but one that is unenforcable (ie has one signature, is not dated, does not have the T&C's with it) then the debt does legally remain and can be requested by the lender. You see it only means that they cannot legally enforce the current agreement or its T&C's.

 

However, they tend to refund the money etc because if we report them to Trading Standards hey will get fiend a hefty hefty amount, plus failure to comply with a CCA request is a criminal offence punishable by a fine of £2500 and/or a length of time in prison - it is mentioned on this thread I think.

 

If they don't have the agreement at all then it is my contention that the debt doesn't exist at all and therefore cannot be requested by the lender.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
Can one of you venerable contributors have a look at this thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/58125-cca-time-limit.html

 

I am not too sure about the advice being given. Is this right because to me it looks like this person has made a CCA request and the creditor or DCA has failed to supply a copy of the agreement.

 

Thats exactly the way that I see it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see that too - what should we do?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
I can see that too - what should we do?

 

And because they haven't supplied a copy of the agreement not only have they comitted a criminal offence but the debt is also unenforceable without them going to court then the judge is not going to be to happy if they then supply the agreement.Also there would be a breach of the DPA.I can see one big lump of poo hitting the fan here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have posted another message for Bubbles. I am always anxious about disagreeing with others because I have only a limited knowledge of this sort of thing. I just hope for Bubbles sake I have read this right because then he/she will finally be able to get the DCA and the bank of their back.

 

Thanks for looking

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see one big lump of poo hitting the fan here.

 

I agree.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
I have posted another message for Bubbles. I am always anxious about disagreeing with others because I have only a limited knowledge of this sort of thing. I just hope for Bubbles sake I have read this right because then he/she will finally be able to get the DCA and the bank of their back.

 

Thanks for looking

 

Hi Jones I've just read it and it is correct in what you say ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have posted another message for Bubbles. I am always anxious about disagreeing with others because I have only a limited knowledge of this sort of thing. I just hope for Bubbles sake I have read this right because then he/she will finally be able to get the DCA and the bank of their back.

 

Thanks for looking

 

It looks to me like you handled it pretty well Jones.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right guys I am going to have to call it a nite - I have been studying for my mortgage exams all evening and I am tired.

 

Good night to all, sleep well and I'll catch up with this thread and everyone else in the morning!! :D

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phew!!! Well this stuff took some reading - but I got here in the end!! :D

 

One thing that does baffle me is - if many of the CCA's don't appear to be with the banks/credit card companies through various reasons like I am reading here (some banks destroy docs, some never execute proper agreements etc..) THEN how is it that the DCA's plan to get their money other than the usual scare tactics??

 

Surely if the CCA's exist then the Banks & CC Companies would be enforcing the debts themselves or forwarding the CCA's & account history along with the debts?

 

I am totally baffled as to how the DCA's are taking court action on debts where there are no proper CCA & SAR materials - how do the DCA's plan this will work?? BUT more to the point how do they expect the claims to go ahead without supplying the required data to support their claims??

 

In my own case I need to concentrate on slamming back a separate claim for their lack of compliance with the data requested?

 

How Would I fill out the particulars of claim?? it's not money being claimed - rather the lack of account information as requested.

 

I think I read enough to make my head spin on this thread tonite - so am going to have a think now as to the best way to do this stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Elizabeth, I think what happens is that when consumers get their court cummons, they rarely turn up so he Judge enters a Judgement and thats why he doesn't ask to see the docs.

 

If the consumer turns up, the lender/DCA rarely do and that's why you hear of people paying something back at £1 a week for the rest of their lives!!

 

That's my understanding, but I may be wrong!!

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been reading the various threads and a little confused.

 

How does it stand if a credit card company cannot provide a copy of the original application form or a Consumer Credit Act Agreement. Is the balance outstanding stil enforceable.

 

Also, does a credit card agreement have to be signed. just applied for an MBNA card online and they sent the card without my signing any agreement. Would the debt stil be enforceable. The card has arrived and has been used.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been reading the various threads and a little confused.

 

How does it stand if a credit card company cannot provide a copy of the original application form or a Consumer Credit Act Agreement. Is the balance outstanding stil enforceable.

 

Also, does a credit card agreement have to be signed. just applied for an MBNA card online and they sent the card without my signing any agreement. Would the debt stil be enforceable. The card has arrived and has been used.

 

Put simply, if there is no agreement then there is no debt, it can't be enforced and doesn't exist. That's if there is no agreement.

 

As for signing, as far as I am aware yes, section 61 of the CCA sets out the format of an executed agreement:

 

61 Signing of agreement

(1) A regulated agreement is not properly executed unless—

(a) a document in the prescribed form itself containing all the prescribed terms and conforming to regulations under section 60(1) is signed in the prescribed manner both by the debtor or hirer and by or on behalf of the creditor or owner, and

(b) the document embodies all the terms of the agreement, other than implied terms, and

© the document is, when presented or sent to the debtor or hirer for signature, in such a state that all its terms are readily legible.

 

However, as far as I understand it the new CCA regulations coming into force in Arpril allow for electronic signatures.

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Un1boy,

 

Yes I reckon you re right cause most people would usually adit a debt and fill in the income expendiutre form that comes with claim and then offer to pay xxx pounds a week etc.. so no questions are ever asked regarding the CCA's etc.. (Mmmm!! clever stuff??) so there is never a need for any person appear in court in respect of defendant cause they fully admitted the claimants claims in full and have offered to settle debt straight away!!

 

So the DCA's are basically "winging" it cause they've taken advantage of "joe public" not knowing their rights etc.. over the CCA stuff etc..

 

This is what I was thinking - just wanted to get it clear in my head cause it seems so "simple" I thought I'd missed the whole point. Thanks for your help - it's so simple it seems untrue? I had to triple check that cause I thought I'd mis understood something. I came to these thoughts last November and thought I'd been going MAD for the answer to be so simple - but this has confirmed everything I initially thought.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Un1boy,

 

Yes I reckon you re right cause most people would usually adit a debt and fill in the income expendiutre form that comes with claim and then offer to pay xxx pounds a week etc.. so no questions are ever asked regarding the CCA's etc.. (Mmmm!! clever stuff??) so there is never a need for any person appear in court in respect of defendant cause they fully admitted the claimants claims in full and have offered to settle debt straight away!!

 

So the DCA's are basically "winging" it cause they've taken advantage of "joe public" not knowing their rights etc.. over the CCA stuff etc..

 

This is what I was thinking - just wanted to get it clear in my head cause it seems so "simple" I thought I'd missed the whole point. Thanks for your help - it's so simple it seems untrue? I had to triple check that cause I thought I'd mis understood something. I came to these thoughts last November and thought I'd been going MAD for the answer to be so simple - but this has confirmed everything I initially thought.

 

Yep, you see, I know people that have received a letter from a DCA saying "here is your court date" and they get scared, thinking "Im not going, they will win"

 

But bear in mind that the consumer most probably hasn't contacted the DCA or the DCA haven't contacted the consumer so the courts issue a date (just like if you dont enter your AQ or defence on time).

 

The date would not have been issued if the consumer would have entered a defence would it? Not at all......

 

My advise is to stand up to these people, issue the CCA/DPA request where relevant and if it goes to court, then at least defend the action.

 

At the end of the day, if I sent a summons to you for 12k and you didn't defend it, what are the courts going to think? "Oh, well elizabeth must owe him it, shes just hiding away from it".

 

So, they issue a court date and you don't turn up. The court think, right ok Elizabeth you'll have to do an attachment of earnings to pay un1boy back.

 

That is a VERY simplistic example - but remember to defend it and put your eveidence to the Judge, then there is no defence is there?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4970 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...