Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Gross misconduct dismissall


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4581 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

this is a complicated scenario but here goes:

 

my son was employed by this company for 2 years and after the first year a deal was struck by the owner and my son to purchase the small company.

this was on a 5 year agreement and each year as the payments were made shares would be transferred to my son .

the first payment was made on the day the contract was signed and my son the became the owner with duties to run the business as per agreement and in the best interests of the company.

he was also employed and on a salary and he was the only director.

 

when he signed the contract he took it on trust as the owner was a jehovas witness and they dont lie and are trustworthy.

 

i started work there in june 2010 on a casual /ad hoc basis as i also run my own business which the owner was fully aware.

 

when the second payment was due to be made some problems arose- the previous owner had still control of the bank account and wouldnt pay suppliers on time and we lost quite a few of our credit facilities.

 

due to the ridiculous ways, i had the contract checked and the previous owner could take control at any time because of the clauses in the contract, and the amount of money he was to recieve wasnt as he had thought.

 

he arranged a meeting on thursday morning at 11.am to make a deal is what their solicitor had stated,

by email to my son,who duly went to the meeting to find the other shareholders there and he was informed that due to gross misconduct the had retaken control of the company and he was dismissed.

 

i was dismissed at the same time and asked to leave- i was the company secretary.

 

his employees on his instructions had gone through our personal bags and and equipment and photograhed bank statements and other documents and tried to accuse us of stealing from his company.

 

 

i need to now find out if this is illegal in any way and my son needs to file for unfair dismissal and is there ant time limits

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is far too complicated. You and your son would be best advised to seek proper legal advice from a solicitor that is conversant not only with employment law but also company law.

 

Did your son have a solicitor to start with when he signed the papers to take the company over? How much money are we talking about?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all,

in answer to the points above , the contract was drawn up by the previous owner and the first payment taken out of the business was £300,000.

the scond payment which should have been paid on the 2nd august 2011 was for £140,000.

the payments were made on the understanding that shares would be transferred as money was paid out.

the crafty solicitor in fact made the shares go from the owner to the ltd co and none to my son.

i have had the contract checked by a solicitor and due to the clauses inserted into the contract my son had basically nothing -just worked his socks off 6 days a week - 14 hour days to promote it and for nothing.

 

the previous owners solicitor also arranged this meeting - according to the phone call and email- to discuss a deal with the previous owner, the solicitor also admitted to my son he got him to the meeting under false pretences.

the solicitor never once advised my son to have legal representation at any point and assured him that it was a honest and genuine arrangement with him having most of the control - when in fact there was none at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...