Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bailiffs - the true horrors - The Exposure TV documentary - Rossendales - Comments


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4341 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

http://www.itv.com/presscentre/exposure/week44/default.html

 

****************************************************************

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 405
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

sounds good hopefully they will let people know their actual rights instead of the bailiffs fantasy take on them

I know my rights Mr DCA I'm with the CAG......hello hello where you gone Mr DCA8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can tell you that some aspects of this docu are shocking!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please email your friends and relatives about this programme.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who can guess which is the most outrageously behaved firm?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have mailed it to my list, and am putting a reminder to record this one....

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep an eye open. The producer has just called me and said that there is a 2 week postponement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps they would consider a follow up and take a look at the High Court system, it was over 30 years ago the £600 ceiling was set to allow a creditor to apply for writ of Fi'Fa' and 30 years ago £600 was a lot of money to be owed by the "ordinary" household and was therefore aimed in the main at business debts.

 

Today the household debtor, struggling in the present climate to keep a roof over their heads ,food on the table, clothes shoes on their childrens backs and feet find themselves facing utility companies quite happy to allow the £600+ being owed to them to becoming upwards of £5,000.

 

Logic tells me and probably the rest of the Forum, if that debtor cannot afford to pay the £600+ in affordable and sustainable amounts then they will have no chance of paying the High Court Enforcement Company the ridiculous amounts they have inflated the debt to with their charges and, of course the creditor will not see a penny of the money owed to them until such time as the HCE company get their fees paid in full. So why do they take such actions?????

 

Then we have the "seizure" of work vehicles, lets take a look at some of those.

 

We have the debtor working as a one man band scraping a living to keep the head just above water, along come the heavies and seize and remove the means to earning that living... the vehicle. To argue their case to that vehicle being essential to their work the debtor is then expected to travel from four corners of the country quite often to London, to answer to an Interpleader.

 

Firstly they have no idea what an Interpleader is let alone the procedures involved in defending it, then they cannot afford to travel to the RCJ as they no longer have an income due to their mode of transport being seized, so we have the debtor unable to defend the Interpleader and the High Court positioned to rule in favour of the HCE company...hmmmm ??????

 

So what if there is no vehicle to seize, no house to charge upon..... well they can always go for a bankruptcy order against the debtor and if successful that then results in nothing for the creditor and the HCE company's exhorbitant fees are also going to go down the pan... so they have achieved what?????

 

Take into consideration the costs the utility companies have incurred (paid for by the consumer) by sending in the heavies to frighten and cajole the debtor into paying thousands of pounds more than the debt then perhaps the £1 a week offered to them by the genuinely struggling debtor wanting to pay the debt, wasn't such a ridiculous offer after all????

 

Rant not over just a prelim to getting answers to some of the questions.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed WD the system is not merely crooked, but is seriously bent, and actually if the amount was £600 in the late 1960's when a 3 bed new home was I am told around £5000 no debt below around £6,000 should be enforced by writ of fi-fa, and HCEOs these days.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stick Jacobs in there also, as they seem to be cropping up here more frequently, but Equita, Ross'n Robbers, Rossendales, and Marstons are pretty dire

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.itv.com/presscentre/exposure/week42/default.html

 

****************************************************************

Edit:-

This has been postponed and is likely to be screened in week 44.

 

A breathing space for the bailiffs - but a chance for you to tell more people to get ready to watch it

I think I'm being a bit dim but I can't make out when or what this programme is going to be... I clicked the link but didn't mention the bailiffs :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I'm being a bit dim but I can't make out when or what this programme is going to be... I clicked the link but didn't mention the bailiffs :???:

 

It will only show up to week 42, which I presume was the week it was showing, it has now been moved to week 44 which is not on show yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I'm being a bit dim but I can't make out when or what this programme is going to be... I clicked the link but didn't mention the bailiffs :???:

 

 

As Bankfodder has already mentioned it has been postponed for 2 weeks, I had cached the original page earlier, so here is what was there:

 

Exposure

 

Episode: 4 of 6Monday, 17 October 2011, 10:35PM - 11:35PM

 

Factual

 

 

 

Bailiffs:

 

This film goes undercover to investigate the behaviour of the bailiffs instructed to chase millions of householders and car owners each year. It asks whether the voluntary guidelines that bailiffs are meant to follow are enough to protect the public.

 

 

Last edited: Tuesday, 4 October 2011

 

 

 

1x1transparent.gif

 

 

 

 

 

1x1transparent.gif

 

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bailiff company in question perhaps trying to stop it getting shown.

Has the potential to lose contracts and damage buisness.

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

possibly, I think there may be a few bailiffs pooping their boxers and maybe a few CEO's corking their poopers:!:

 

Couldn't happen to a nicer (not) bunch, They will be desperately trying to prevent this docu being shown, as it could seriously undermine the fear factor when they are exposed for what they really are.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant see how they will stop it from being aired though, in hindsight it will just prove they have something to hide.. Will that be a good thing, perhaps, but as we all know that its been done I think we could make more noise to have it aired than the bailiffs who appear on it having it stopped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

possibly, I think there may be a few bailiffs pooping their boxers and maybe a few CEO's corking their poopers:!:

 

I think one of the CEO's may be from North East Lincolnshire Council.

 

 

Residents caught out with unlawful Council Tax penalties.doc

 

EDIT:

 

Changed Jpg. image for Doc. Should see it now

Edited by outlawla
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...