Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

getting deposit back, could really use some help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4597 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have looked over the forum and all do there seems to be soooo much help on here i am feeling a bit confused as to what i do and don't need to do

 

i will try to explain my situation as best i can and want to thank anyone in advance for any help provided

 

i moved into my property in September 2010, i paid a deposit of £975 which on my tenancy clearly states is protected with mydeposits.co.uk (i have this cofirmed in writing and emails that my deposit was and has never been protected with any of the 3 schemes)

 

around 4/5 months into the tenancy i had a call from the letting agent stating they had missing rent payments on my account (they stated 8 weeks) and then proceeded to start a court case against me to get an order to get possession of the property (i was 100% sure they was incorrect but by now they had already contacted newham housing benefits who had suspended my claim two weeks prior to the contact from my letting agent so if i was 8 weeks in arrears when they contacted me i could of only been 6 weeks in arrears when they contacted newham - not that i was in arrears at all)

 

they called me up and stated this needed to be sorted ASAP or me and my son would be homeless. So they mentioned the fact if i wished they could use my deposit against arrears until this was all cleared up and that i also had to setup a re-payment plan)

 

i agreed to this as i new one way or another i would prove i was right, i visited newham and agreed that the rent could be sent direct to them and that i was going to go court and show my proof . A few weeks later i received a call from the letting agent stating they was '' So sorry '' that there had been a mistake and my rent had been sat in an account where they wasn't able to tie it to my rent account

 

the very next day i received another call stating in fact i was still in arrears but only 6 weeks and so the court case was canceled, giving me no where to show my proofs i was not in fact in arrears at all

 

two months ago i received a section 21 (after a phone call from them stating current landlord was selling the property and wanted me out)

 

this again turned out to be a lie as the landlord had suffered enough from this shady letting agent and had in fact started a new contract with winkworth and was more then happy to let me stay where i was and i have since signed a new tenancy

 

my problem is now they are refusing to give me my deposit back, in fact they are ignoring me and shelter all together

 

shelter have stated the following

 

1) they cannot use your deposit for rent arrears as it was never proven rent arrears and your deposit was never protected

 

2) that as my deposit was never protected i could claim it back + 3 x the amount

 

3) that if my deposit has been protected they could of made a claim for rent arrears and use my deposit for that but a letter they sent me stating they used my deposit for rent arrears (even do the so called arrears never decreased was invalid anyways)

 

i am just confused as to what i am meant to do all i want is my deposit back and to put this sorry mess behind me i have canceled the payment plan on shelters advice as again they say the fact they don't no whats owed and whats not is not a good sign

 

does anyone have a template letter i can send them to request my deposit back, if they ignore that what do i do next any advice or templates would really mean a lot

 

so a recap

 

1) deposit paid never protected even do its stated it was

2) they say my deposit was used for rent arrears but never reduced arrears and ive been informed they cannot do this anyways mid tenancy

3) filed a court case stating i was 8 weeks in arrears which they later canceled

4) served me an invalid section 21 (due to no deposit protection) station reason was landlord wish to sell property which was a lie

 

ps. sorry for my spelling and lack of grammar i have done this all via a mobile it was hard work trying to remember not to use text speak :smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

but the landlord never received the original deposit this was given to the letting agent who where the ones who kept it and never protected it, in fact my original landlord new nothing about a deposit. They have not requested a new deposit no as they stated '' they don't ask for deposits and never have '' so i am confused as to why the landlord is the one who has to deal with it as i had no contact with the landlord (other then them fixing problems in the property as they didn't trust the letting agent)

 

my contract was with the letting agent and the deposit was also provided to them which they confirm in writing when they state they can use it for the arrears that's its in there possession

Link to post
Share on other sites

my contract was with the letting agent and the deposit was also provided to them which they confirm in writing when they state they can use it for the arrears that's its in there possession
Do you have your original tenancy agreement? Who is shown as the landlord on it? (Lets call them Mr A or Agency B)
Link to post
Share on other sites

In view of your last post, I apologise. The arrangement is unusual, but yes, your contract appears to be with the agency.

 

You seem to have had 2 consecutive tenancies for the same property

 

Tenancy A - up to 2 months ago with shady agent

Tenancy B - from the end of tenancy A - with either landlord or Winksworth

 

The 2 are totally separate and (if there are any) rent arrears from A do not affect B.

 

You need to write to shady agent, keeping a copy of he letter and getting a free proof of posting from the PO. In this letter, you should tell them what you want (return of your full deposit) and why (end of your tenancy on the day before the winkworth one started). Say that if you do not receive this within 14 days you will take legal action.

 

If the agent has not paid up in time, make a claim at www.moneyclaim.gov.uk. The agent may counterclaim for any number of things, but they will have to prove those claims. All you have to prove is that you paid the deposit to them initially. This page will give you more info regarding the court process - it's not difficult. http://tenancyanswers.ucoz.com/index/court_information/0-53

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for your help is there any sort of template with what should and what shouldn't be written on the letter i sent, i was told not to inform them yet that i no that my deposit wasn't protected thanks snorkerz

Link to post
Share on other sites

As that tenancy is now over, the issue of non-protection is irrelevant, you can't start a claim for non-protection after the end of the tenancy. http://tenancyanswers.ucoz.com/index/section_214_claims/0-45

 

Lets see if we can knock something up for you.

 

letter before action

 

Dear Sirs

 

RE: 123 High Street, Anytown, AT1 2AA

 

On the XXX of XXX 20XX I/We paid you a tenancy deposit of £XXX in respect of the above property.

 

This tenancy ended on xx/xx/2011. Please refund my/our deposit IN FULL within 14 days. If you fail to do so, I/we shall sue you for the balance due. This claim may also be subject to a penalty of three times the value of the deposit under section 214 of the 2004 Housing Act.

 

Yours sincerely

Now, as I said above, a claim for non-protection is a non-starter, UNLESS they claim that the tenancy is still ongoing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you so much, that's a great help, does the fact the section 21 has not expired yet and they threatened court action against my landlord station mr bla bla is our tenant and as such taking him has broken a set of rules and sections they quoted, does that not mean im still class as a tenant of there's ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - the section 21 does NOT end the tenancy. The fact you have a tenancy from Winksworth proves that your tenancy with ths shady agency is over.

 

Can I check though, because this one is twisting and turning....

 

Does the person you refer to as your LANDLORD own the building/flat/whatever? or do you think he rents it off someone else?

Is your new contract between you and the landlord, or between you and Winksworth?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great, that is the basis I was working on.

 

The issue between the landlady and the dodgy agents is between them. Originaly, she let the property to them, and they sublet it to you. All perfectly legit.

The landlady seems to have terminated the tenancy between her and the dodgy agent, meaning that the dodgy agent could no longer let it to you because they didn't have control over it anymore. That may, or may not, have been done properly, but it doesn't affect your situation.

 

Continue as planned ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

can i ask one more question

 

as i stated my deposit was never protected, even do my tenancy stated it was

 

when they told me i was in arrears and was taking em to court i panicked and agreed to them using my deposit to offset the arrears while i proved they was in the wrong

 

they asked me to sign a peice of paper they said in the post - it stated i agree to allow '' bla bla agent '' to use my deposit of £975 towards rent arrears

 

now i am told by shelter this is illegal and the whole reason the bond protection scheme is in place

 

they was contacted on my behalf by newham homeless unit (i was at one stage going to be homeless) and they stated he cannot get his deposit back for the above reason

 

am i stuffed now ? should the letter i was going to send them from above template be edited to let them no i no my deposit was never protected and that i will take them to court if needs be

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well there is no longer a deposit to protect is there?

 

You need to get all your paperwork together and work out - how much did I pay to this agency from when I moved in to the day before the Winkworth tenancy took over.

 

Then add up all the rent you should have paid for the same period.

 

Let us know if there is a difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...