Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have posted the letter off today - sent recorded delivery, so should get to the Police early next week. I also walked along the street where this happened and checked if there were any CCTV cameras or video door bells in that section of the road, but could only find one. I talked to the owners of the house with the camera but they say it is set to only cover the area leading up to the house and not really the pavement or road and footage also auto deletes after 72 hours, so anything captured would be gone now. That was disappointing. I walked along the road a bit more, but couldn't see any other video door bells or CCTV, so that didn't help.  I always thought most people have at least a video door bell these days but not in that road... 😐 So came home a bit disappointed.  If anything else happens I will post an update here, but may not be for a week or so. Not sure how long this will take now.
    • Hi all.   I've just cancelled my Virgin Media because my Wife and I are going abroad for 12 months or so. My Son will be staying in our home, and wishes to start a contract with them. He signed up to a great deal for New Customers online, and a Contract Agreement was signed online. He had a delivery date for a Self Installation Kit but it never arrived. After speaking to numerous Virgin Media Staff online, they are insisting that he calls their Pre Installation Team (I presume that is their sales Team to try and get more money). He doesn't want to speak to them over the phone. He doesn't mind doing a Live Chat, but he hasn't got an Account Number yet, so that's impossible. He even had a chat with a Team Member on Whatsapp, who say they don't have access to the information they need, so he has no option but to call them. Why can't they just be straightforward with their Communications? Is there any other option other than calling them?   TIA.
    • Hi All, I'm looking for help with a P2G claim for another lost parcel. Given the wealth of information on this site, I'm hopeful that this should be an easy one to fix, but want to be sure I have everything. On the 6th March, I contracted with P2G to send a parcel (a £600 Pioneer AVH-Z7200DAB car stereo which is not on either P2G or EVRi's excluded from compensation or prohibited items list) using EVRi, sent it off, and that was the last I heard of it. The EVRi tracking showed that the parcel had made it to the national sorting hub at 2:12 on the 7th, and then vanished. By Friday, I had started to get nervous, and so, raised an enquiry. And then another, and another - well, they weren't responding, and I couldn't get their telephone one to work, I think in all, it was more than 15 enquiries. I also raised an investigation with P2G as well. EVRi closed the enquiry confirming a loss on the 19th March, and P2G near the end, although P2G closed it claiming that I needed to send photos of the parcel as proof - which I didn't have, and I also do not have an account with P2G so couldn't upload anything (I did test, just in case), and this is why despite receiving advice on the EVRi Fb group to send the letter before claim, I haven't yet acted. I have proof of the eBay listing, and the refund, to demonstrate that which was being sent, but P2G's insistence that I have no photographic proof of the parcel with the label - I have the photo of the goods in their box before sending, but this is for the eBay listing, and so does not show it after the fact. This I fear is what P2G will seek to rely on as a defence, hence my 10 week delay on progressing with this. But, I am more than £600 out of pocket for the loss: £600 for the item and £8.04 for the delivery fee, although my claim will actually be for an initial £611.09 to cover the cost of the loss, their delivery fee, and my 1st Class Recorded stamp for the Letter Before Claim to P2G, rising to £681.09 to cover the additional £70 cost of opening the court case if they fail to respond within 14 days. This question mark surrounding P2G's request for photographic evidence, is this likely to cause me a problem? Steve
    • Had a letter response today dated 12/6/24 from PRA Group re request for information consumer credit act 1974. Confirming they are in receipt of my CCA letter request - and that they are requesting the required information. They returned the £1 postal order. And my CCA letter. Stating that they will contact me with an update ASAP. They attached/included a standard ( non personal ) page about ' what they should provide ' and ' what happens If I don't get this information'.    I need to file my defence by 21 June 24. Any suggestions as to what that defence should be ?   
    • Thanks @dx100uk for responding promptly.    To be quite honest with you, applying for breathing space might not really help except some short term relief. I don’t want to default either as I might lose my job too and I cannot really afford it. Sorry for sounding bit stupid but is there something I can do to stop them charging interest and agree on reduced payments? Can I use pro-rata payment letters to get out of this situation without too much impact? I am working on information that @BankFodderhas requested and will be sharing it later today.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Marston Bailiff Visits with invisible distress warrant for unpaid criminal fine


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4618 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Wonder if somebody could give me some advice relating to a bailiff visit on 6th September 2011

 

At approx 9.30am my partner was waking me up she informed me that there was a bailiff sat outside and wanted to speak with me.

I went outside to find out what was going on the bailiff informed me that he had a distress warrant and wanted full payment or was going to take my goods.

 

I asked to see such warrant to which he said he didnt have to show it to me so i told him to sling his hook to which he replied i will call a lock smith then showed me his ID badge.

 

I told him to call a lock smith then good luck to them as my door is reinforced to prevent any tomcat burglar from coming along and breaking into my house.

 

I couldn't wait for the lock smith to arrive to watch, Was going to record it would of been funny :-D

 

Anyway the bailiff decided to call the police instead so they arrived young single copper on his own explained to him that i was not letting the bailiff in on my own free will after the bailiff flashing his ID card again to the police officer he told me in front of the officer that he forgot to mention earlier that preventing him from his duty i was committing a criminal offense the police officer said nothing about what he had said as i ****ed myself with laughter :lol:

Anyway after the officer and the bailiff had a word the officer told me that by not complying with him i was causing a breach of the peace to which i was forced to let him in to which the officer stayed till he was in my door then left.

Inside the bailiff took an inventory of goods didnt mount to much i would of gladly paid him to take the goods he wanted the 100 pound that was on my kitchen side and then wanted 100 pound a month he filled out this notice of distress which i have attached to my post to view.

 

When he left i just put it down to sods law and the fact you cant win them all.

Until i was looking on the forum the other night and came across by chance a post relating to bailiffs and how some ****** bailiff had treated them unfairly, So i decided to check my info in relation to threads left and to my surprise firstly notice the police officer had no right to get involved and threaten to arrest me for not complying.

 

I ring the court named on the notice of distress which you will see is pontypridd to which they tell me they have never heard of me let along a distress warrant being issued they even go as far as checking gwent magistrates to which again nothing i was advised they don't use marston group only excel and swift, I was then told to take legal advice as nothing they could do for me.

 

I contacted the ministry of justice to check the bailiffs certificate to which they could not find this bailiff on there register, So i contacted marstons and kindly asked for confirmation that the bailiff was certificated to which after being put on hold for ages the lady came back and told me he was i asked in which court was this certificate granted to which she said she didn't know and would ring me back after speaking with this bailiffs manager to which she didn't.

I took advice briefly to find also that the police are responsible for viewing this distress warrant as he could be anyone but didn't bailiff just flashed his ID card at him and they become bosom buddies.

 

The dates represent a time in Devon criminal fine i had moved and didn't pay and can only assume the distress warrant has come from there but notice says pontypridd???

 

I really wanted to see a copy of this alleged distress warrant as i understand after 180 days it becomes void if all was in order with the paperwork there shouldn't of been a problem to show it to me upon asking him, Is that correct that he does not have to show it to me???

 

Also the goods he marked up would of nowhere near covered the balance he was asking not even if he sold them 10 times over, I was advised that the warrant i didn't see should of been sent back as goods don't cover it?? Is this correct???

 

I have today rang my local police station to make a formal complaint and advised a Sargent will ring me today but didn't bother, I know they can be busy so will wait or ring them back.

Apart from the complaint i don't really know where i go from here in relation to this threads i have read are of similar nature but not my circumstances so would much appreciate your advice.

 

Thanks for reading and sorry if i have bored you to death :sleep:

 

Birde

 

Marston Notice of Distress edited copy.jpg

Edited by citizenB
Have popped in some spacing to make reading easier
Link to post
Share on other sites

your spelling and grammer are bad!

 

i'm not sure on the time line of expiry

but

 

as its was a criminal fine

 

yes he did have right of entry and could have forced entry too.

 

there are several cag newsletters of recent to read

 

as well threads too here as you have done and dont forget the stickies

not exactly my game

 

but me thinks you need to pay what is owed, else prison could not be that far away.

 

dx

the troops will be here in the morning.

 

thread renamed as well

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are lots of stickies in the bailff forums that will probably have information on what you can do next. If you dont get any where with telephoning your police station. Perhaps a letter in the form of an official complaint will do the trick :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick Update

Rang the court involved distress warrant issued in October 2010 was never renewed.

I have read many interesting posts on the 180 day rule for returning un-executed warrants back to the courts

Bailiff has argued 12 months for criminal fines saying his warrant ends in Dec 2012?????

I have looked on hmcs and came across this SPECIFICATION FOR PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT PROVISION

Which clearly state in 6.13 that its 90 days but i know from reading around been increased to 180days.

I cant help feeling i am being shafted :-x Why should my warrant and any dealings with it be any different.

The rules are the rules.

Surely any fees incurred in this matter are invalid??

Go back to the bailiff i keep being told as he is dealing with it but when i do he knows no other words as an explanation other than Locksmith and Payment!!

Any thoughts on this as to me whats the point of having rules if companies like marston can just ignore them??

 

Birde

Link to post
Share on other sites

All Marstons want at this stage are their fees, and a little matter of rules which they will ignore if they can extract payment, is of no consequence to them imho. I am not sure as to the 180 day expiry, perhaps tomtubby will have a definitive answer.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks for your reply.

Its the posts from Tomtubby i have got this information on after reading around the forum.

Surely are consumer rights and the wrong doings of companies like Marston should be fought for rather than backing down to making payments to them over few months that's easy way out what about the wrong doings do i just blatantly let them get away with it.

Or do i stand up and fight for my rights and do whatever it takes to deal with it??

What about the next person this bailiff visits does he carry out what he has always done or learn from previous jobs and see people wont and will not back down if there in the wrong.

Its time to break the trend and make some noise any help

 

Birde

Link to post
Share on other sites

your spelling and grammer are bad!

 

i'm not sure on the time line of expiry

but

 

as its was a criminal fine

 

yes he did have right of entry and could have forced entry too.

 

there are several cag newsletters of recent to read

 

as well threads too here as you have done and dont forget the stickies

not exactly my game

 

but me thinks you need to pay what is owed, else prison could not be that far away.

 

dx

the troops will be here in the morning.

 

thread renamed as well

 

According to the experts on just about every other thread we have involving fines, the Bailiff needs a specific, seperate warrant of entry signed by a judge to force entry. His normal warrant of execution does not allow him.

 

Otherwise the first time you know you have Bailiff's on your case is when the bailiff's collecting fines smash their way through your front door or window.

 

I suggest the OP report the Police officer to police complaints and do his best to get him sacked, and contemplate civil action for financial remedy due to the officers actions, stepping well outside his legal duties - refusing a Bailiff entry is not breach of the peace. He stepped outside his duty.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was always under the impression that criminal fines held right of forced entry, unlike ctax stuff.

 

as i said, legal is not my game..........

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was always under the impression that criminal fines held right of forced entry, unlike ctax stuff.

 

as i said, legal is not my game..........

 

dx

 

Not sure myself DX, but I thought they coudln't force entry on a first visit, and would need a specific warrant from the court to do so on a subsequent visit. I am going to research this one to satisfy myself, but for a more immiediate, and likely definitive answer, tomtubby's our girl.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick Update:

 

Ok so i said i would fight and that's exactly what i have done.

The warrant is now on hold pending multiple of serious complaints i will be making.

I did not mention in last update about the recording of all calls this has been invaluable in my situation.

I understand there is an organisation which i cant name will not only investigate my complaint but will be looking into more wider things.

I will come back and let you all know very soon along with the edited audio clips to show how serious this situation turned out in the last few days.

 

At 2.50pm the bailiff rang with threats of locksmith and the fact i will be paying and the levy was still valid but by 3.15pm he was ringing back to explain all he ever had was my familys best interests at heart i do understand that his manager has had a word in between regarding the telephone call he had with two organizations.

Sorry i can not be more specific but i will put everything up once i have got it sorted to show others and hopefully others may benefit from my experience.

 

Birde

Link to post
Share on other sites

10/10

 

birdie

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

A bailiff executing warrants of distress(magi fines) does not need to carry a warrant. Even if he was carrying a warrant, it would only be a company facsimile of the original warrant. The original would be held at the relevant enforcement office. The least the bailiff should have done is show you the facsimile, or tell you the warrant could be viewed during office hours at the enforcement office.

 

The bailiff is allowed to force entry without prior levy if the following conditions are met:

1. the debtor is in and refusing access.

2. the bailiff has had permission from the magistrate to force entry(can be done over the phone)

3. the bailiff has passed a training course to satisfy the magi that he is able to safely carry out the warrant in this manner

 

If you refuse to allow the bailiff access you are doing nothing wrong, but if you try to STOP the bailiff entering then you commit a breach of the peace as the bailiff has the legal right to enter.

 

If you paid the bailiff, did he give you a receipt. The ref no. should be on the receipt. If you contact the office with that ref no., they will give you the magi courts ref no and tell no. You can then speak to the magi about appeals process.

 

The fine only expires after 180 days for the bailiff enforcing it, but the bailiff may request a 1 month extension. If the bailiff fails to collect, the warrant then may be passed to another enforcement company to attempt to collect.

 

Its a CRIMINAL fine. They do not expire. If nobody can collect on the warrant, then it is returned as appropriate and the magi courts then deal with it. Usually by a summons or a warrant for your arrest issued. Failing to pay a magi fine is another criminal offence in itself which can, and often does, lead to a custodial sentence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thanks for your comments guys

Ok so had a response from the court with my complaint.

Have attached the edited letter for your viewing.

Yes point (2) that is true recorded on tape bailiff offered me to come to his house after working hours to view the distress warrant. :shock:

Point (3) bailiff was never certificated in the court he said he was from seems when court sent me there final response to my complaint they didnt bother to check his claims out so sent an embarrassing letter giving them the details of the actual court he was certificated at and the telephone number to confirm it. also asking them to explain why they have not investigated my complaint properly???

 

I will be taking my complaint further as there is more questions to ask than before.

 

http://i1085.photobucket.com/albums/j429/distress2/complaintedited.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...