Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello I hope someone can give me some advice here, as I am at a bit of a loss on how to proceed. This relates to alleged offences under the RTA. Yesterday I received a notification from the local police of intention to prosecute for the following offences: 1 driving without due care and attention 2 failing to stop at a road traffic accident 3 failing to report a road traffic accident At this stage they have only asked me to say whether I was the driver at the time or not and provided a blank sheet of paper to give information about the incident. Going by the location (just round the corner from where I live) I can only imagine this relating to one recent incident, which wasn't actually an accident but more of a road rage event. I was driving past someone unloading or working next to his lorry which had stopped in the road. I wasn't going fast or anything, while I went by lorry man turned around and punched and kicked my car whilst going past him. I stopped and got out and wanted to know what he thought he was doing punching and kicking my car. He then hurled some verbal abuse at me, swearing and he was quite aggressive. I still didn't know what his problem was and said I would report him to his company for threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I got my phone and tried to take a photo of his lorry and number plate but at that moment he came right at me, still shouting and swearing, so I was worried he may hit me next, as he already punched my car. I thought if the guy hits me I will come off second best, so I decided to retreat. I quickly got back into my car and left. When I checked my phone later the photo I tried to take was blurred and useless, so I thought it was pointless to report the incident to the police, as the guy would not be traceable. Over that I forgot about it until I got the letter yesterday in the post. This is the only thing I believe this can relate to, but I have no idea based on what the three above allegations come from There was no road traffic accident, more of a road rage incident. So I am at a loss what to do. I have 28 days to respond. Should I just say yes I was the driver and was there and see what happens next, or should I already make a written statement on the attached piece of paper they sent me and send that with it ? Is there anyone here who would have a rough idea what to do next ? I tried my legal advice line through my Union, but they have sent me from pillar to post, now say it needs to go to a different department again and that would be chargeable as the RTA comes under Criminal Law. So any advice would be appreciated Many Thanks
    • So a quick update got bounced around two different departments and managed to speak to a DVLA bod , explained the situation and they could see the overlap and that DD payments had been made from Feb , also no formal remiders prior , they gave me a number for the legal dept who I am calling this morning to see what they can do in terms of the SJP notice , still have time to submit this online.  Will update after my chat this morning 
    • Also, I am trying to understand how invoicing a large sum in a 6m period becomes tax fraud?   Is it because if he had invoiced over the £85k threshold he should have been obligated to charge vat?  Which would have meant hmrc would have benefited from the vat amount? So by not charging it Hmrc have lost out on £s revenue?  Is that what makes it tax fraud? So as a self-employed contractor, let's say he invoiced one Co for 200k.  Should he have charged vat on the full 200k (£40k)? Or just on the sum above the threshold (£23k)?  And that by not charging vat, he has knowingly withheld tax £s from Hmrc? And is the payer complicit ?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HSBC/Rockwell DCA - Urgent advice needed please :-(


maud26
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4635 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

I am writing on behalf of a very good friend who had been receiving hassling phone calls at work from a DCA (Rockwell). When i enquired as to why she was avoiding the calls she explained that they were a DCA who were calling continuously about a debt she had incurred whilst with her previous partner, he had left her with two children to cope on her own with a joint debt of just under 10k. I asked her to bring in a letter from the DCA and offered to send a CCA request and also a harrassment by telephone letter which i did just over 2 months ago. They promptly wrote back declaring:

 

'We can confirm that the account assigned to our above named client relates specifically to a current account and as such is not regulated under the CCA 1974. Due to the nature of this account there is no written agreement to provide.

 

The enclosed statement showing repayments is your acceptance of liability'

 

So when I read this i questioned her further and she described what i can only interpret as a 'consolidation loan' offered to them by HSBC, she has since provided a statement from March 2010 which describes it as a 'Managed Loan Account'.

 

Now Rockwell are still making calls despite the letter i sent them, and i wonder where we can go from here. The previous partner has left her with two children, one on the way and pays not a single penny whatsoever and she is frightened to death of the DCA turning up on her doorstep. Is there anything we can do now??

 

Thank you in advance

 

Maudy xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, an HSBC managed loan.. these are presenting quite a few issues. If it is a loan, then you are entitled to see the agreement.

 

However, if it is a current account then there simply wont be one.

 

You could send a Subject Access request, which should net you all the information in respect of your friend's financial history with the bank. It will cost you £10.00 and you will find a draft letter in the CAG library.. linked in green at the top of the screen. the company is allowed 40 calendar days to respond to the SAR. You send it to HSBC.. not the DCA.

 

I am assuming the ex is not around to help pay this off? Do you know if the ex is being chased as well ?

 

Rest assured that the DCA has no power of entry if they were to turn up on the doorstep. In theory they are not permitted to do so without an appointment and I assume your friend is unlikely to give permission. In the event that someone does turn up. Just ask them to go away.. There is a draft letter in the CAG library to send in respect of doorstep visit :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

These managed loans are starting to

crop up a lot are from the period

just after the banks failed, consolidating

a current account and overdraft into a loan

and ''managing'' the use (to thee benefit of the bank of course)

there should be a confirmatory agreement of some sort

I think.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thanks for your reply. No the ex is not around - he doesn't help her financially or any other way and i think communications have broken down and so she is not aware if he is being pursued for it. She has explained to DCA that its a joint debt and they don't seem to care. So do you think the only option is to send the SAR? - Is this the only way we can find out if its a loan or account?

 

Thank you once again

 

Maudy xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with citizen B that you should

do the SAR it's probably the only way

to get the information required.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

HiAt work today and my friend has bought in some paperwork relating to the DCA info - its an arrears notice from HSBC dated March 2010 and clearly states that 'This arrears notice is required to be issued under the CCA 1974' and goes on to quote that it relates to a credit agreement...... Does this mean that it IS a credit agreement and therefore we do have the right to pursue the CCA request??Failing that SAR will be done this evening lol :-)Many ThanksMaudy xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

A loan will be subject to CCA 1974, an OVERDRAFT

is not so regulated as it is described as a facility.

I f it is a regulated agreement the you can do a CCA

request, a SAR can be done at any time on any form of account.

So you can do both, as they are not obliged to send a copy

agreement with a SAR.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres the thread about O/D's and the CCA, it's a long one so put the kettle on first!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?237096

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HiAt work today and my friend has bought in some paperwork relating to the DCA info - its an arrears notice from HSBC dated March 2010 and clearly states that 'This arrears notice is required to be issued under the CCA 1974' and goes on to quote that it relates to a credit agreement...... Does this mean that it IS a credit agreement and therefore we do have the right to pursue the CCA request??Failing that SAR will be done this evening lol :-)Many ThanksMaudy xx

 

If they are issuing an arrears notice under the CCA1974 then yes it is covered under CCA1974 and there should be an agreement. I think the clue is in the Title.. "Managed LOAN" :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi again

Thanks for getting back to me - it takes me a while in between posts as Im currently undergoing chemo so apologies for the delay.

So what do you think I should send now - pursue the CCA as the letter does indeed state 'This arrears notice is required to be issued under the CCA 1974' - i guess i could enclose a copy of this said letter along with a CCA request???

 

Or should i send a SAR?

 

Thank you to everyone who replied - i appreciate it so much as does my lovely friend

 

Maudy xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry to hear of your priority battle, that should be foremost in your concerns, not these tin pot good for nothing con artists, I guarantee that all of them would agree that money is far more important than health as far as they are concerned! Fools.

 

Anyhow, this gives you something to do I guess, and you could send them the CCA request in light of your last couple of posts, see what they come back with....if you need the link to it just ask.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sound advice from Boo - further to that, my suggestion would be that before the SAR you could try:

 

Sent By Royal Mail Recorded Delivery

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Account Reference: 123456789

 

In your letter, dated xx/xx/xx you stated that you were under no obligation to provide me with information regarding the above account under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 as the account is considered not to be covered by that Act.

 

In your subsequent letter, informing me of the arrears on the above account, you clearly state: "'This arrears notice is required to be issued under the CCA 1974" which is a clear, written admission that the account is covered by the Act.

 

I therefore require you to comply with my previous formal request for the relevant information.

 

(If you haven't already sent a £1 PO):

I enclose a Postal Order for the statutory amount of £1 to cover the fee for the request of a CCA, which must only be used for that purpose. If you are unable to comply with my request, you should inform me in writing, returning the payment.

 

(If you have already sent the £1 PO):

On xx/xx/xx I sent you a Postal Order for the statutory amount of £1 to cover the fee for the request of a CCA, which must only be used for that purpose. If you are unable to comply with my request, you should inform me in writing, returning the payment.

 

I look forward to your written response.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

I'm sure others will be able to suggest better wording, but the above might save your friend a tiny bit of money before trying a SAR.

 

I'd also be inclined to enclose the "In writing only" and "No doorstep visits" letters in the same envelope - keep a copy of everything and never answer the phone to them or give "security details" - keep everything in writing so you have a very definite paper trail/proof.

 

Hope that helps and best of luck with both your health and your mission to help your friend.

 

H. x

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Halibutt, that sounds like a good plan and your letter is sound :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...