Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Is the letter headed Letter of Claim/before Claim or similar? If not, it sounds like more of the threatogram chain. If you're not sure, post up an anonymised copy of the letter and we'll check. HB
    • So guess what, we have received a final demand letter for £100. It states if payment is not made by 11/06 they will have no option but to forward the case to their litigation dept with a view to commence County Court Proceedings. So just wondering if anyone has any advice. Do we ignore this? or do we need to take action? Thanks 
    • hi dx, thanks for helping just re-reading everything this morning and I must have missed this one from uncle in his thread "What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. "  are you in disagreement with this based on your last sentence?
    • Thanks for the reply and clarification, that might just explain why in my case contact has pretty much ceased. Though with such companies it doesn't mean they won't ever threaten to return to court as a tool to force one's hand if they feel they are not self informed on their chances etc.  But concerning how last year they tried to use the CCJ to get a charging order and the court granted an intirum order on our mortgage using the CCJ that would have been a good 2-3 months beyond the 6 years, should the court not have checked the age of the CCJ in the first case or would they always grant an interim order simply off the back of a CCJ being produced without even checking the age of it?.  Had I not defended that action at the time they may well have got a default using a CCJ older than 6 years which could be a concern going forwards. At the time when I contacted the court to question the paperwork for a final order application the clerk suggested people don't get informed when companies apply for interim charging orders, they are automatic if a claimant has a CCJ and people only get contacted once a date for a final order application goes through. kind of begs the question if such companies can continue a seemingly backdoor method to attempt default action if un-defended if the initial application doesn't need to check the age of a CCJ?.
    • Hello!  Wondering if someone can help with this.  I suspect not but worth a go.  I appreciate the "contract is with the seller" line, which is what Evri has fed me but wanted to see if someone with experience in these things could suggest anything else I could do here.  I appreciate there are many topics about lost parcels - My parcels weren't lost, until the driver walked up to my door with them and then decided to make them lost/stolen... I'll summarise what has happened.  Wednesday of last week - Evri delivery driver stole / walked off with 3 of my parcels.  -  Arrived outside my properly, took photos (3 separate photos as its 3 separate deliveries) of the tops of the parcels (pointlessly zoomed in on just the labels, couldn't see anything else, other than a small piece of the pavement and a little weed, which doubly confirms it was outside my door as I can see the same plant), marked the order as delivered and walked off with them.  He's marked on the Evri GPS marked that he was outside.   -  3 different deliveries, from the same company (same boxes etc.), but 3 separate tracking numbers. -  Went through the Evri bot which opened a case on each tracking number.  I then phoned them and left a voicemail explaining what had happened. -  24 hours later had a canned response asking me if the packages had turned up and to check around etc..  I responded explaining again what happened and that they've definitely been taken. -  4 days later,  this morning, I get a response telling me to ask the merchant to refund me. I've responded to this message with a long email, repeating what I said, that I believe the driver has stolen these packages and that he took those suspicious top down shots of the packages, marked them as delivered without ringing or knocking etc.  I've said that I expect them to investigate further, but I gather they won't. In my several messages to them initially and later, I told them I don't care about a refund and wanted the parcels.  They contain some sentimental stuff, nothing of high monetary value, hence me going to this trouble.  I only paid £25 for the contents. I did contact the merchant when this first happened and they asked me to wait a few days.  They ended up refunding me despite me asking them not to and that I wanted them to escalate it with Evri because this appears to be a case of theft.  They didn't seem bothered - Refunded me and told me to go back to Evri and escalate it with them? So - Is there any way to compel Evri to conduct a proper investigation with this driver?  Search for my parcels? I have quite a lot of deliveries handled by Evri (not out of choice) - They used to have a fantastic chap and I rarely had any issues.  He has been replaced by a new guy and I believe the route is handled by this same guy who I believe has taken my packages.  Naturally, I fear this is going to happen again in the future if no investigation occurs. Appreciate any assistance - Thanks for reading. Al.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord ending tenancy


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4631 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello There

 

Would be grateful of some advice

 

My tenancy agreement runs for a term of 2 years with a 12 month get out clause, we have been in property now for 15 months

 

I Received an email today from landlord stating that they were now selling the property and they were giving me 2 months notice, is there anything that we can do about this at all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there

 

Is states

Both parties agree that this is a twenty four month contract with a twelve month get out clause

 

The parties agree

 

Notice is hereby given that possession might be recovered under Ground 1, Schedule 2 of the housing act 1988 if applicable. That is that the Landlord used to live in the property as his or her main home or intends to occupy the property as his or her only or main home

 

The tenancy may be brought to an end if the morgagee requires possession on default of the borrower under Ground 2, Schedule 2 of the housing act 1988

 

Before the Landlord can end this tenancy, he shall serve notice on the tenant in accordance with the provisions of the Housing Acts. Such notice shall be sufficiently served if served at the last known address of the tenant in accordance with section 196 of the law of property Act 1925

 

The property is in England

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO, there is no get out clause. There is a statement that says there is one, but it does not say what notice is required, or how either the tenant or the landlord can exercise the clause.

 

If we put that issue to one side for a moment, this link tells you how the section 21 process works - it is this process that the landlord has to use to bring the tenancy to an end (unless you are in breach of contract, in which case he can also use section 8). http://tenancyanswers.ucoz.com/index/being_evicted/0-21

 

Had the break clause been valid, the LL would have exercised it, and then served a section 21 notice. It is possible that the email contained sufficient information to constitute a s21 notice, but from your quote above Such notice shall be sufficiently served if served at the last known address of the tenant, and he has no way of proving that the email was served at the address specified. To follow through the s21 to the courts, he would need such proof.

 

So, if you do not move out as requested, the landlord would have to apply to the courts. The courts would send you a form and you would claim that the s21 has an expiry date before the end of the fixed term (because there is no break) and that it wasn't correctly served.

 

Did you pay a deposit? Is it protected in a government approved scheme?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the advice we did pay a deposit which is with the tenancy deposit scheme.

 

What do we do about this now we have not yet received the letter we were advised by email that we would receive yet which I guess is the S21 you refer to.

It is a minefield isnt it.

Our previous Landlord did a similar thing, we paid a year up front and he said he was looking for a long time let, we did loads to the house and after six months he served notice as he wanted to come back to the house to live.

Now it is such a worry we became self employed since April this year following my husband being made redundent, so what we didnt realise was that in itself would cause a problem when applying for housing in the private sector as you have no real credible work history, the council has no obligation to help as we are both forty somethings with no dependants

So do we just sit this out

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you do now?

 

Well, as a precaution, I would certainly be looking for a new place.

 

However, wait until the s21 arrives. The countdown doesn't even begin until that is served upon you.

The s21 will have an expiry date, anything from a week after that you will get a form from the court saying that your landlord is seeking possession.

With that form will be a defence form that you must return within 14 days. That is when you state to the court that the s21 was invaid because of the lack of break clause.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok

 

Further to my previous posts, Landlord has been managing property however we received a Section 21b from original letting agent giving us two months notice.

We have als0 received a letter from the letting agent stating the following

 

I clarify that the agreement is for 24 months this is not a fixed term agreement as it does state on it Assured Shorthold Agreement and nowhere does it state that this is for a fixed term. This enabeling both yourselves and Landlord to give notice once 12 months has expired.

 

But as you stated how this can be given or by what means, even though the legal requirement is that it is given in writing and must be for a minimum notice period of two full months

 

 

Please can someone explain where we stand now, it states there is a break clause however it does not state how this can be exercised.

 

Landlord has sent a further email regarding rent payments prior to vacating on 20th November

Link to post
Share on other sites

The s21 notice IS NOT a notice to quit. You DO NOT have to leave on the 20th Nov, and you may want to make it perfectly clear to the agent and landlord that you have no intention of doing so.

 

Other than that, my advice remains the same. Wait until the court paperwork arrives, and defend it. Even if your defence fails (and it shouldn't) you will be given at least 2 weeks by the judge and after that it will probably take 6 weeks to organise bailiffs - so you'd probably have a couple of months to organise somewhere else.

 

What did the landlords email say about paying rent?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there

 

Thank you for the advice the Landlord has said that she wants it in writing that we will continue paying the rent until we vacate on the 20th November( this is the date she expects us to move out) however we pay our rent regularly on the 25th of each month as stated on tenancy agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would reply simply stating that you intend to continue to comply with your obligation to pay rent. Don't give any further details.

 

Alternatively, you could not reply at all - after all, what will she do if you don't?

 

Be interesting to see if she accepts full rent on the 25th October - because she seems to think you'll only be paying for 25/10 to 20/11 - that's less than a month.

 

TBH, any such written statement from you would be worthless - it has no more effect than your obligations under the tenancy agreement which would stand up in court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I clarify that the agreement is for 24 months this is not a fixed term agreement as it does state on it Assured Shorthold Agreement and nowhere does it state that this is for a fixed term. This enabeling both yourselves and Landlord to give notice once 12 months has expired.

 

The above is nonsense of the purer kind.

 

In your agreement it says: "Both parties agree that this is a twenty four month contract with a twelve month get out clause". If it has no such clause and says no more about how any right to break is to be exercised then there is no right to break.

 

Write back to the agents saying that there is no right to break and that accordingly you intend to stay for the full term agreed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou

I have responded to the agent stating the above, we have now had an email back from the Landlord saying she is currently maintaining property not the agent she says she is in talks with her solicitor, she has not mentioned the fact that we have said we intend to stay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...